Rosenthal 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.47	80	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	87	0.02	70	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		34	0.50	30	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.16	81	0.03	42	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.38	51	0.00	33	0.06	40	0.15	68	0.04	38	0.08
Bacha 2000		46	0.45	52	0.00	20	0.06	26	0.27	53	0.05	19	0.12
Badura 1965		84	0.19	42	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	84	0.02	87	0.02
Barbosa 1983		87	0.13	81	0.00	57	0.04	66	0.04	82	0.02	64	0.03
Biret 1990		25	0.53	43	0.00	24	0.06	22	0.32	72	0.04	26	0.11
Blet 2003		52	0.41	14	0.00	67	0.06	46	0.06	86	0.02	65	0.03
Block 1995		77	0.27	34	0.00	72	0.05	59	0.05	85	0.02	73	0.03
Blumental 1952		33	0.50	23	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.46	58	0.04	18	0.14
Boshniakovich 1969		63	0.38	64	0.00	78	0.03	86	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		26	0.53	24	0.00	22	0.08	18	0.39	68	0.04	20	0.12
Bunin 1987		85	0.17	17	0.00	87	0.04	76	0.04	81	0.02	75	0.03
Bunin 1987b		86	0.16	18	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Chiu 1999		80	0.23	65	0.00	56	0.04	70	0.04	86	0.02	60	0.03
Cohen 1997		81	0.23	66	0.00	27	0.06	38	0.16	27	0.27	12	0.21
Cortot 1951		41	0.48	39	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	67	0.04	57	0.04
Csalog 1996		28	0.52	44	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.22	38	0.13	14	0.17
Czerny 1949		47	0.45	59	0.00	63	0.04	61	0.04	86	0.02	68	0.03
Czerny 1990		12	0.60	15	0.00	11	0.18	11	0.49	86	0.03	22	0.12
Duchoud 2007		69	0.34	82	0.00	52	0.04	74	0.04	87	0.02	71	0.03
Ezaki 2006		35	0.49	22	0.00	16	0.10	16	0.42	67	0.03	23	0.11
Falvay 1989		29	0.52	67	0.00	15	0.11	19	0.38	24	0.43	6	0.40
Farrell 1958		55	0.41	6	0.00	30	0.07	25	0.28	85	0.03	29	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		68	0.35	83	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.03	67	0.03
Fliere 1977		21	0.54	40	0.00	39	0.05	28	0.23	86	0.03	34	0.08
Fou 1978		50	0.43	31	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.20	76	0.03	35	0.08
Francois 1956		36	0.48	68	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	87	0.02	81	0.03
Friedman 1923		73	0.31	45	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.03	83	0.03
Friedman 1923b		75	0.31	46	0.00	75	0.04	62	0.04	84	0.03	76	0.03
Friedman 1930		65	0.37	32	0.00	74	0.04	77	0.04	69	0.04	54	0.04
Garcia 2007		43	0.47	69	0.00	47	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.03	72	0.03
Garcia 2007b		44	0.45	53	0.00	61	0.04	78	0.04	86	0.02	82	0.03
Gierzod 1998		19	0.54	70	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.13	85	0.03	43	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.67	54	0.00	8	0.18	10	0.51	18	0.29	9	0.38
Groot 1988		67	0.35	19	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	78	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		70	0.34	13	0.00	60	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Hatto 1993		82	0.22	28	0.00	80	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.03	80	0.03
Hatto 1997		78	0.24	71	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.03
Horowitz 1949		74	0.31	47	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.03
Indjic 1988		79	0.24	9	0.00	81	0.05	57	0.05	84	0.03	52	0.04
Kapell 1951		10	0.62	25	0.00	25	0.06	21	0.32	77	0.03	28	0.10
Kissin 1993		24	0.54	5	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.30	54	0.04	25	0.11
Kushner 1989		16	0.57	10	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.17	59	0.05	30	0.09
Luisada 1991		51	0.42	84	0.00	41	0.05	37	0.16	80	0.03	39	0.07
Lushtak 2004		71	0.32	72	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	70	0.04	56	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.55	16	0.00	19	0.05	39	0.16	53	0.05	31	0.09
Magaloff 1978		11	0.60	12	0.00	14	0.09	13	0.45	35	0.21	10	0.31
Magin 1975		14	0.58	20	0.00	18	0.08	17	0.40	56	0.05	16	0.14
Michalowski 1933		31	0.51	55	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	76	0.03	51	0.04
Milkina 1970		7	0.66	60	0.00	10	0.12	9	0.52	57	0.04	17	0.14
Mohovich 1999		23	0.54	11	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.22	70	0.04	33	0.09
Moravec 1969		6	0.67	41	0.00	5	0.37	5	0.59	4	0.56	5	0.57
Morozova 2008		59	0.40	29	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	82	0.03	53	0.04
Neighaus 1950		61	0.38	56	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	82	0.03	79	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		20	0.54	37	0.00	17	0.10	14	0.44	78	0.03	24	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.43	26	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	84	0.03	50	0.04
Osinska 1989		17	0.56	8	0.00	31	0.06	27	0.25	78	0.04	27	0.10
Pachmann 1927		45	0.45	48	0.00	69	0.05	54	0.05	79	0.03	49	0.04
Paderewski 1930		38	0.48	85	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	60	0.03	48	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.41	33	0.00	43	0.05	36	0.16	77	0.03	40	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.32	86	0.00	73	0.04	69	0.04	77	0.04	46	0.04
Poblocka 1999		37	0.48	73	0.00	58	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.03	59	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		8	0.65	74	0.00	6	0.21	7	0.56	21	0.28	7	0.40
Rachmaninoff 1923		13	0.59	21	0.00	7	0.21	6	0.57	51	0.05	13	0.17
Rangell 2001		40	0.48	27	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.03	77	0.03
Richter 1976		83	0.20	87	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	83	0.02	86	0.02
Rosen 1989		15	0.58	35	0.00	29	0.09	24	0.29	84	0.03	32	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.85	4	0.01	4	0.58	4	0.83	3	0.82	4	0.82
Rosenthal 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.99	1	0.91	1	0.90	1	0.98	2	0.98	1	0.98
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.95	3	0.01	3	0.85	3	0.95	3	0.93	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.97	2	0.05	2	0.88	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rossi 2007		58	0.40	88	0.00	34	0.06	41	0.15	46	0.09	21	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.48	75	0.00	21	0.07	20	0.36	41	0.12	11	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.51	76	0.00	12	0.13	15	0.43	28	0.36	8	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.45	61	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.13	60	0.05	37	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		53	0.41	62	0.00	40	0.05	44	0.11	84	0.02	44	0.05
Shebanova 2002		30	0.52	77	0.00	50	0.05	50	0.05	87	0.03	55	0.04
Smith 1975		9	0.63	7	0.00	9	0.12	8	0.54	62	0.04	15	0.15
Sokolov 2002		27	0.52	49	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.17	72	0.03	41	0.07
Sztompka 1959		22	0.54	57	0.00	35	0.05	31	0.21	81	0.03	36	0.08
Tomsic 1995		64	0.38	89	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	66	0.04	47	0.04
Uninsky 1932		56	0.41	50	0.00	68	0.08	45	0.08	79	0.03	45	0.05
Uninsky 1971		76	0.31	36	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03	63	0.03
Wasowski 1980		66	0.37	63	0.00	70	0.05	49	0.05	85	0.02	58	0.03
Zak 1937		54	0.41	78	0.00	59	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.02	84	0.02
Zak 1951		60	0.39	79	0.00	66	0.05	51	0.05	87	0.02	61	0.03
Random 1		89	-0.23	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	55	0.04	88	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.14	38	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	53	0.04	69	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.23	58	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).