Rosenthal 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		29	0.56	59	0.00	31	0.05	26	0.21	64	0.04	32	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		33	0.55	21	0.00	24	0.08	20	0.27	48	0.06	18	0.13
Ashkenazy 1981		70	0.39	18	0.00	34	0.04	40	0.10	57	0.04	45	0.06
Bacha 2000		78	0.36	58	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	59	0.04	65	0.03
Badura 1965		71	0.38	48	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.04
Barbosa 1983		87	0.13	42	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Biret 1990		39	0.52	33	0.00	36	0.04	39	0.10	78	0.03	56	0.05
Blet 2003		46	0.49	35	0.00	62	0.03	72	0.03	70	0.04	76	0.03
Block 1995		83	0.31	78	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Blumental 1952		54	0.46	14	0.01	14	0.07	25	0.23	63	0.04	26	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.54	32	0.00	40	0.04	32	0.13	46	0.07	28	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.46	29	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.04
Bunin 1987		66	0.41	40	0.00	46	0.04	60	0.04	48	0.07	55	0.05
Bunin 1987b		68	0.40	66	0.00	47	0.04	54	0.04	48	0.07	48	0.05
Chiu 1999		85	0.24	82	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	69	0.03	87	0.02
Cohen 1997		86	0.20	79	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	38	0.17	38	0.07
Cortot 1951		34	0.55	83	0.00	42	0.04	37	0.10	66	0.04	46	0.06
Csalog 1996		19	0.59	51	0.00	17	0.06	21	0.26	12	0.39	9	0.32
Czerny 1949		22	0.59	43	0.00	20	0.07	15	0.32	57	0.05	19	0.13
Czerny 1990		21	0.59	84	0.00	18	0.06	18	0.29	50	0.04	22	0.11
Duchoud 2007		79	0.36	73	0.00	30	0.05	30	0.14	54	0.05	35	0.08
Ezaki 2006		43	0.50	85	0.00	27	0.06	28	0.18	58	0.04	33	0.08
Falvay 1989		56	0.45	67	0.00	64	0.03	67	0.03	39	0.25	29	0.09
Farrell 1958		69	0.39	70	0.00	67	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.45	45	0.00	72	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.03	79	0.03
Fliere 1977		12	0.63	37	0.00	22	0.07	17	0.30	77	0.04	20	0.11
Fou 1978		48	0.48	16	0.01	35	0.04	36	0.11	81	0.03	40	0.06
Francois 1956		50	0.47	52	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	67	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1923		73	0.37	38	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.03	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		72	0.37	23	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03
Friedman 1930		61	0.43	22	0.00	76	0.03	69	0.03	65	0.04	78	0.03
Garcia 2007		36	0.54	74	0.00	41	0.05	35	0.11	80	0.03	44	0.06
Garcia 2007b		41	0.51	60	0.00	50	0.04	52	0.04	80	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		13	0.63	27	0.00	19	0.06	13	0.33	49	0.06	16	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.66	9	0.01	11	0.10	9	0.39	24	0.22	10	0.29
Groot 1988		82	0.33	49	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.03	83	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.49	36	0.00	15	0.07	22	0.25	56	0.05	23	0.11
Hatto 1993		81	0.35	86	0.00	74	0.03	66	0.03	56	0.06	64	0.04
Hatto 1997		74	0.37	87	0.00	73	0.04	50	0.04	51	0.06	51	0.05
Horowitz 1949		58	0.44	46	0.00	65	0.03	75	0.03	70	0.04	74	0.03
Indjic 1988		77	0.36	88	0.00	75	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.06	49	0.05
Kapell 1951		5	0.70	75	0.00	10	0.12	7	0.48	51	0.05	13	0.15
Kissin 1993		11	0.63	28	0.00	12	0.10	11	0.34	83	0.03	25	0.10
Kushner 1989		18	0.59	30	0.00	38	0.04	42	0.09	75	0.04	41	0.06
Luisada 1991		63	0.42	44	0.00	59	0.05	48	0.05	87	0.02	66	0.03
Lushtak 2004		67	0.41	80	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.64	5	0.03	6	0.17	10	0.36	10	0.41	7	0.38
Magaloff 1978		20	0.59	15	0.01	13	0.07	23	0.25	37	0.19	11	0.22
Magin 1975		16	0.60	53	0.00	29	0.05	24	0.24	71	0.04	24	0.10
Michalowski 1933		24	0.58	54	0.00	33	0.05	29	0.15	64	0.05	31	0.09
Milkina 1970		10	0.64	24	0.00	21	0.06	19	0.29	82	0.03	30	0.09
Mohovich 1999		38	0.53	61	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	81	0.04	63	0.04
Moravec 1969		14	0.63	7	0.02	7	0.13	6	0.50	5	0.56	5	0.53
Morozova 2008		52	0.46	63	0.00	37	0.04	45	0.07	78	0.03	50	0.05
Neighaus 1950		60	0.44	41	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.04	84	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		30	0.56	55	0.00	45	0.04	58	0.04	83	0.03	71	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.48	17	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.09	64	0.04	43	0.06
Osinska 1989		25	0.58	34	0.00	32	0.05	34	0.12	84	0.03	39	0.06
Pachmann 1927		28	0.56	68	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.08	28	0.24	14	0.14
Paderewski 1930		37	0.54	56	0.00	49	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.46	69	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	81	0.03	68	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		84	0.27	47	0.00	87	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.03
Poblocka 1999		7	0.65	39	0.00	23	0.09	12	0.33	67	0.04	21	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.62	8	0.01	9	0.10	14	0.33	35	0.14	12	0.21
Rachmaninoff 1923		8	0.64	3	0.05	5	0.30	5	0.62	15	0.35	6	0.47
Rangell 2001		59	0.44	62	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	80	0.03	82	0.03
Richter 1976		51	0.46	11	0.01	25	0.07	33	0.12	42	0.15	17	0.13
Rosen 1989		27	0.56	57	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	53	0.05	62	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931		3	0.85	2	0.07	3	0.37	3	0.82	4	0.83	4	0.82
Rosenthal 1931b		2	0.85	6	0.03	2	0.30	2	0.83	4	0.86	2	0.84
Rosenthal 1931c		1	0.88	1	0.62	1	0.61	1	0.86	4	0.86	1	0.86
Rosenthal 1931d		4	0.84	4	0.04	4	0.51	4	0.81	4	0.85	3	0.83
Rossi 2007		80	0.35	50	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	60	0.05	69	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		64	0.42	31	0.00	63	0.03	68	0.03	53	0.05	58	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.43	71	0.00	26	0.06	38	0.10	56	0.06	36	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		75	0.36	64	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.04	77	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		23	0.59	20	0.00	16	0.06	16	0.31	51	0.06	15	0.14
Shebanova 2002		32	0.56	76	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	48	0.06	53	0.05
Smith 1975		26	0.57	10	0.01	28	0.06	31	0.14	58	0.04	37	0.07
Sokolov 2002		17	0.60	13	0.01	8	0.11	8	0.44	25	0.24	8	0.32
Sztompka 1959		31	0.56	12	0.01	39	0.04	27	0.18	73	0.04	34	0.08
Tomsic 1995		76	0.36	89	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	58	0.06	73	0.03
Uninsky 1932		42	0.51	25	0.00	60	0.05	47	0.05	60	0.05	52	0.05
Uninsky 1971		47	0.48	77	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	69	0.04	59	0.04
Wasowski 1980		65	0.41	90	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.04	67	0.03
Zak 1937		40	0.51	65	0.00	57	0.05	46	0.05	51	0.05	47	0.05
Zak 1951		44	0.50	26	0.00	58	0.07	44	0.07	50	0.05	42	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.13	72	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	9	0.47	27	0.10
Random 2		88	-0.12	19	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	33	0.14	54	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.26	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).