Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		12	0.77	14	0.01	7	0.11	5	0.57	24	0.36	9	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		25	0.70	22	0.01	22	0.08	26	0.27	31	0.24	29	0.25
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.64	41	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.11	44	0.08	64	0.09
Bacha 2000		35	0.67	9	0.02	17	0.12	16	0.40	4	0.47	13	0.43
Badura 1965		71	0.57	47	0.00	72	0.05	55	0.05	38	0.24	49	0.11
Barbosa 1983		83	0.47	53	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	20	0.25	53	0.10
Biret 1990		28	0.69	74	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.21	18	0.35	27	0.27
Blet 2003		19	0.72	28	0.00	24	0.05	25	0.27	3	0.47	19	0.36
Block 1995		68	0.57	16	0.01	43	0.04	43	0.07	24	0.22	44	0.12
Blumental 1952		48	0.63	25	0.00	18	0.14	21	0.32	13	0.27	24	0.29
Boshniakovich 1969		36	0.67	64	0.00	40	0.04	40	0.11	48	0.07	63	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		37	0.66	60	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.19	14	0.39	26	0.27
Bunin 1987		86	0.33	89	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.05	84	0.04
Bunin 1987b		87	0.33	81	0.00	86	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.04	81	0.04
Chiu 1999		70	0.57	50	0.00	45	0.04	71	0.04	28	0.23	51	0.10
Cohen 1997		85	0.39	39	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	16	0.35	54	0.10
Cortot 1951		78	0.55	82	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	71	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		59	0.60	33	0.00	68	0.05	52	0.05	15	0.37	40	0.14
Czerny 1949		58	0.60	76	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.04	82	0.04
Czerny 1990		16	0.75	44	0.00	12	0.09	10	0.47	11	0.43	10	0.45
Duchoud 2007		80	0.54	27	0.00	47	0.04	70	0.04	38	0.13	71	0.07
Ezaki 2006		21	0.71	8	0.02	26	0.06	28	0.23	27	0.25	30	0.24
Falvay 1989		62	0.59	32	0.00	73	0.05	54	0.05	23	0.44	36	0.15
Farrell 1958		49	0.62	83	0.00	48	0.04	68	0.04	35	0.20	58	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		33	0.67	12	0.01	23	0.09	31	0.20	8	0.46	22	0.30
Fliere 1977		11	0.77	24	0.01	16	0.14	11	0.47	33	0.20	21	0.31
Fou 1978		15	0.75	38	0.00	11	0.09	9	0.48	5	0.50	6	0.49
Francois 1956		26	0.69	48	0.00	29	0.05	22	0.29	7	0.51	17	0.38
Friedman 1923		41	0.66	58	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	33	0.36	39	0.15
Friedman 1923b		42	0.65	29	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	34	0.35	41	0.14
Friedman 1930		43	0.65	35	0.00	58	0.04	75	0.04	35	0.32	48	0.11
Garcia 2007		22	0.71	77	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.18	25	0.33	32	0.24
Garcia 2007b		13	0.76	19	0.01	13	0.11	17	0.39	16	0.45	15	0.42
Gierzod 1998		10	0.77	6	0.04	9	0.12	7	0.55	21	0.39	8	0.46
Gornostaeva 1994		14	0.75	10	0.01	15	0.14	13	0.43	7	0.45	12	0.44
Groot 1988		63	0.59	21	0.01	32	0.06	38	0.12	28	0.30	35	0.19
Harasiewicz 1955		31	0.67	34	0.00	27	0.06	35	0.17	51	0.06	56	0.10
Hatto 1993		57	0.61	72	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	39	0.14	65	0.09
Hatto 1997		55	0.61	56	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	41	0.15	62	0.09
Horowitz 1949		81	0.53	65	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	48	0.08	75	0.05
Indjic 1988		54	0.62	20	0.01	53	0.06	47	0.06	40	0.16	52	0.10
Kapell 1951		18	0.74	17	0.01	21	0.07	19	0.35	30	0.15	33	0.23
Kissin 1993		17	0.74	45	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.38	25	0.33	20	0.35
Kushner 1989		8	0.77	36	0.00	10	0.09	12	0.46	16	0.47	7	0.46
Luisada 1991		4	0.80	1	0.31	1	0.31	1	0.66	1	0.67	1	0.66
Lushtak 2004		65	0.58	57	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	46	0.08	74	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		77	0.56	84	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	69	0.03	86	0.03
Magaloff 1978		56	0.61	46	0.00	69	0.06	46	0.06	36	0.21	45	0.11
Magin 1975		2	0.80	4	0.10	3	0.15	4	0.58	2	0.58	4	0.58
Michalowski 1933		29	0.68	75	0.00	41	0.04	41	0.08	38	0.15	47	0.11
Milkina 1970		1	0.82	2	0.14	2	0.23	2	0.64	1	0.64	3	0.64
Mohovich 1999		3	0.80	11	0.01	6	0.16	3	0.60	2	0.72	2	0.66
Moravec 1969		82	0.52	62	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	33	0.23	69	0.07
Morozova 2008		23	0.71	5	0.05	19	0.09	20	0.35	15	0.41	16	0.38
Neighaus 1950		38	0.66	78	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.05	85	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		52	0.62	63	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	46	0.05	80	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.70	42	0.00	28	0.07	23	0.28	28	0.30	23	0.29
Osinska 1989		6	0.78	15	0.01	5	0.12	6	0.55	9	0.54	5	0.54
Pachmann 1927		79	0.55	73	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	25	0.26	60	0.09
Paderewski 1930		44	0.64	85	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	35	0.15	68	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		39	0.66	54	0.00	30	0.06	27	0.26	24	0.27	28	0.26
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.59	68	0.00	71	0.06	45	0.06	20	0.37	37	0.15
Poblocka 1999		40	0.66	18	0.01	42	0.04	44	0.07	57	0.05	72	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.67	86	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.14	17	0.31	34	0.21
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.63	79	0.00	44	0.04	42	0.08	53	0.05	73	0.06
Rangell 2001		72	0.57	55	0.00	59	0.03	80	0.03	18	0.36	55	0.10
Richter 1976		84	0.41	13	0.01	85	0.04	69	0.04	52	0.06	76	0.05
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		74	0.56	80	0.00	84	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.04	83	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		67	0.58	49	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	24	0.29	61	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		69	0.57	66	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	24	0.27	66	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.56	87	0.00	83	0.04	66	0.04	28	0.23	57	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		66	0.58	69	0.00	82	0.04	63	0.04	23	0.29	50	0.11
Rossi 2007		51	0.62	31	0.00	46	0.04	72	0.04	13	0.44	42	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		50	0.62	52	0.00	61	0.03	77	0.03	11	0.38	46	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		73	0.57	37	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.46	38	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.63	7	0.02	38	0.06	36	0.14	15	0.41	31	0.24
Schilhawsky 1960		75	0.56	70	0.00	70	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05	78	0.05
Shebanova 2002		7	0.78	23	0.01	8	0.13	8	0.51	20	0.36	14	0.43
Smith 1975		5	0.78	3	0.10	4	0.15	15	0.41	5	0.47	11	0.44
Sokolov 2002		60	0.59	59	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	50	0.05	79	0.04
Sztompka 1959		9	0.77	43	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.43	26	0.31	18	0.37
Tomsic 1995		64	0.58	30	0.00	60	0.03	78	0.03	8	0.56	43	0.13
Uninsky 1932		34	0.67	40	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	45	0.10	70	0.07
Uninsky 1971		53	0.62	88	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	51	0.07	77	0.05
Wasowski 1980		20	0.72	71	0.00	25	0.06	24	0.28	18	0.28	25	0.28
Zak 1937		27	0.69	51	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.18	55	0.04	67	0.08
Zak 1951		30	0.68	26	0.00	35	0.07	30	0.20	59	0.04	59	0.09
Random 1		90	-0.35	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.13	61	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	46	0.04	87	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.16	67	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.05	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).