Richter 1976

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.68	26	0.00	15	0.14	20	0.47	59	0.05	25	0.15
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.56	40	0.00	38	0.12	38	0.28	75	0.03	41	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.52	14	0.01	21	0.07	34	0.36	54	0.04	39	0.12
Bacha 2000		81	0.17	74	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	68	0.03
Badura 1965		7	0.72	6	0.03	9	0.20	8	0.59	13	0.53	5	0.56
Barbosa 1983		76	0.24	25	0.01	74	0.03	70	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.03
Biret 1990		66	0.32	79	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	73	0.04	67	0.04
Blet 2003		44	0.52	44	0.00	53	0.06	51	0.06	68	0.04	53	0.05
Block 1995		23	0.61	58	0.00	32	0.08	36	0.31	43	0.08	22	0.16
Blumental 1952		77	0.22	82	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.78	4	0.05	4	0.23	4	0.62	18	0.47	7	0.54
Brailowsky 1960		65	0.33	64	0.00	69	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.03
Bunin 1987		12	0.68	77	0.00	8	0.21	10	0.55	3	0.57	6	0.56
Bunin 1987b		14	0.68	8	0.02	7	0.22	9	0.55	3	0.57	4	0.56
Chiu 1999		63	0.35	70	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	52	0.04	50	0.05
Cohen 1997		87	0.02	65	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02
Cortot 1951		18	0.62	17	0.01	18	0.10	12	0.53	31	0.22	11	0.34
Csalog 1996		74	0.25	31	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.03	75	0.03
Czerny 1949		11	0.69	66	0.00	10	0.14	14	0.51	34	0.32	10	0.40
Czerny 1990		60	0.40	80	0.00	64	0.04	65	0.04	87	0.03	78	0.03
Duchoud 2007		53	0.47	37	0.00	28	0.06	37	0.29	32	0.18	18	0.23
Ezaki 2006		33	0.56	59	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.12	80	0.03	46	0.06
Falvay 1989		85	0.11	46	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.02	83	0.02
Farrell 1958		64	0.34	49	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.51	45	0.00	49	0.05	61	0.05	31	0.14	44	0.08
Fliere 1977		9	0.70	12	0.02	11	0.15	6	0.60	46	0.06	20	0.19
Fou 1978		50	0.49	27	0.00	50	0.05	62	0.05	77	0.03	61	0.04
Francois 1956		72	0.27	54	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	80	0.03
Friedman 1923		25	0.59	35	0.00	30	0.08	24	0.45	42	0.18	16	0.28
Friedman 1923b		26	0.59	19	0.01	29	0.06	23	0.45	42	0.19	13	0.29
Friedman 1930		31	0.56	11	0.02	31	0.08	28	0.40	44	0.15	17	0.24
Garcia 2007		35	0.55	50	0.00	46	0.12	44	0.12	64	0.04	45	0.07
Garcia 2007b		43	0.52	55	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.20	78	0.04	42	0.09
Gierzod 1998		22	0.61	60	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.36	67	0.04	38	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.42	73	0.00	55	0.06	56	0.06	86	0.02	77	0.03
Groot 1988		57	0.41	75	0.00	57	0.06	54	0.06	70	0.04	56	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.75	13	0.01	5	0.24	5	0.61	15	0.40	9	0.49
Hatto 1993		30	0.56	18	0.01	27	0.08	17	0.50	44	0.10	19	0.22
Hatto 1997		28	0.57	81	0.00	24	0.06	15	0.51	64	0.05	21	0.16
Horowitz 1949		2	0.80	2	0.19	2	0.31	7	0.59	3	0.56	2	0.57
Indjic 1988		29	0.57	83	0.00	26	0.05	16	0.51	66	0.04	30	0.14
Kapell 1951		41	0.53	23	0.01	37	0.11	32	0.36	64	0.04	36	0.12
Kissin 1993		10	0.70	7	0.03	12	0.11	13	0.52	53	0.04	29	0.14
Kushner 1989		48	0.49	47	0.00	54	0.07	48	0.07	87	0.02	62	0.04
Luisada 1991		38	0.53	84	0.00	51	0.05	60	0.05	79	0.03	57	0.04
Lushtak 2004		52	0.48	34	0.00	39	0.07	43	0.14	76	0.03	48	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		34	0.55	10	0.02	20	0.07	35	0.35	26	0.23	14	0.28
Magaloff 1978		75	0.24	85	0.00	79	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.04	70	0.03
Magin 1975		21	0.61	43	0.00	35	0.08	29	0.38	61	0.04	35	0.12
Michalowski 1933		24	0.59	86	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.45	35	0.18	15	0.28
Milkina 1970		55	0.45	21	0.01	56	0.07	47	0.07	53	0.05	47	0.06
Mohovich 1999		62	0.37	72	0.00	62	0.06	49	0.06	87	0.03	65	0.04
Moravec 1969		83	0.14	71	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.02
Morozova 2008		15	0.64	32	0.00	19	0.10	30	0.38	62	0.04	37	0.12
Neighaus 1950		16	0.63	61	0.00	14	0.11	18	0.48	78	0.04	31	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		47	0.50	87	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	47	0.05	51	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.53	52	0.00	22	0.07	26	0.41	49	0.05	28	0.14
Osinska 1989		49	0.49	78	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	82	0.03	58	0.04
Pachmann 1927		42	0.53	69	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	53	0.04	52	0.05
Paderewski 1930		59	0.41	62	0.00	61	0.06	58	0.06	71	0.03	63	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		37	0.54	67	0.00	45	0.09	46	0.09	80	0.03	49	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		69	0.30	30	0.00	71	0.04	64	0.04	86	0.02	71	0.03
Poblocka 1999		3	0.79	3	0.10	3	0.19	1	0.67	13	0.47	3	0.56
Rabcewiczowa 1932		68	0.30	22	0.01	73	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.04	73	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		39	0.53	33	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.20	74	0.03	43	0.08
Rangell 2001		67	0.30	41	0.00	58	0.06	57	0.06	79	0.03	66	0.04
Richter 1976		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		58	0.41	29	0.00	59	0.06	52	0.06	69	0.04	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.46	15	0.01	41	0.07	42	0.15	33	0.12	33	0.13
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.20	88	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.03	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.20	56	0.00	83	0.01	87	0.01	87	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.21	48	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.17	89	0.00	85	0.02	81	0.02	86	0.03	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		84	0.13	51	0.00	86	0.01	88	0.01	81	0.03	82	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		70	0.29	24	0.01	72	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.04	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		86	0.10	20	0.01	81	0.02	82	0.02	85	0.03	90	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		73	0.25	57	0.00	75	0.04	68	0.04	68	0.04	64	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		1	0.81	1	0.29	1	0.28	2	0.67	8	0.57	1	0.62
Shebanova 2002		27	0.58	76	0.00	36	0.09	27	0.40	56	0.04	32	0.13
Smith 1975		61	0.37	16	0.01	65	0.05	63	0.05	85	0.03	59	0.04
Sokolov 2002		51	0.48	36	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.37	46	0.06	23	0.15
Sztompka 1959		19	0.62	9	0.02	25	0.06	25	0.43	60	0.05	24	0.15
Tomsic 1995		71	0.29	28	0.00	80	0.02	80	0.02	83	0.02	84	0.02
Uninsky 1932		8	0.70	42	0.00	13	0.11	11	0.53	42	0.19	12	0.32
Uninsky 1971		5	0.75	5	0.04	6	0.25	3	0.62	13	0.45	8	0.53
Wasowski 1980		36	0.54	38	0.00	43	0.08	41	0.18	50	0.06	40	0.10
Zak 1937		17	0.62	68	0.00	16	0.08	19	0.47	67	0.04	26	0.14
Zak 1951		20	0.62	63	0.00	17	0.07	21	0.47	71	0.04	27	0.14
Random 1		88	-0.03	53	0.00	66	0.03	72	0.03	5	0.55	34	0.13
Random 2		89	-0.11	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	15	0.30	54	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.17	39	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.04	86	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).