Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		5	0.81	2	0.13	2	0.15	3	0.60	6	0.52	3	0.56
Anderszewski 2003		42	0.61	50	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.13	36	0.21	40	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.52	41	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.27	24	0.28	33	0.27
Bacha 2000		83	0.35	59	0.00	65	0.05	52	0.05	46	0.06	63	0.05
Badura 1965		28	0.67	44	0.00	22	0.05	22	0.36	11	0.53	19	0.44
Barbosa 1983		85	0.28	65	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	72	0.04	84	0.03
Biret 1990		67	0.48	60	0.00	64	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.05	68	0.05
Blet 2003		23	0.69	67	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	13	0.38	44	0.16
Block 1995		40	0.62	38	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	26	0.19	53	0.10
Blumental 1952		71	0.44	27	0.01	29	0.05	32	0.23	20	0.21	37	0.22
Boshniakovich 1969		10	0.78	25	0.01	15	0.15	14	0.47	8	0.55	11	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		79	0.42	33	0.00	73	0.04	75	0.04	54	0.04	70	0.04
Bunin 1987		43	0.59	85	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.16	13	0.47	34	0.27
Bunin 1987b		47	0.59	71	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.16	13	0.47	32	0.27
Chiu 1999		80	0.38	68	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	62	0.04	71	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.15	80	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.04	87	0.03
Cortot 1951		29	0.66	51	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.23	19	0.41	30	0.31
Csalog 1996		48	0.59	24	0.01	43	0.06	44	0.11	8	0.43	36	0.22
Czerny 1949		11	0.76	81	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.49	19	0.47	13	0.48
Czerny 1990		35	0.64	73	0.00	52	0.04	66	0.04	78	0.03	88	0.03
Duchoud 2007		64	0.50	77	0.00	54	0.04	68	0.04	23	0.26	52	0.10
Ezaki 2006		41	0.61	23	0.01	56	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.08	57	0.06
Falvay 1989		84	0.35	30	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	54	0.07	64	0.05
Farrell 1958		78	0.42	31	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		20	0.70	18	0.01	26	0.06	21	0.37	2	0.55	17	0.45
Fliere 1977		4	0.81	4	0.07	4	0.17	1	0.61	5	0.48	4	0.54
Fou 1978		44	0.59	48	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.17	28	0.21	38	0.19
Francois 1956		62	0.55	62	0.00	66	0.07	47	0.07	49	0.05	62	0.06
Friedman 1923		49	0.58	78	0.00	55	0.05	63	0.05	36	0.33	48	0.13
Friedman 1923b		50	0.58	87	0.00	53	0.05	65	0.05	36	0.33	47	0.13
Friedman 1930		55	0.58	79	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	43	0.15	54	0.09
Garcia 2007		25	0.68	55	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.29	21	0.36	28	0.32
Garcia 2007b		31	0.66	72	0.00	23	0.06	27	0.34	24	0.35	24	0.34
Gierzod 1998		6	0.80	7	0.05	8	0.22	4	0.56	10	0.51	7	0.53
Gornostaeva 1994		51	0.58	75	0.00	67	0.06	48	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.06
Groot 1988		72	0.44	52	0.00	69	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.05	69	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.73	22	0.01	9	0.11	7	0.54	7	0.50	8	0.52
Hatto 1993		54	0.58	15	0.01	35	0.12	26	0.34	22	0.30	29	0.32
Hatto 1997		46	0.59	54	0.00	33	0.06	24	0.34	20	0.33	27	0.33
Horowitz 1949		19	0.70	76	0.00	24	0.06	28	0.32	8	0.52	21	0.41
Indjic 1988		45	0.59	70	0.00	34	0.10	23	0.34	20	0.33	26	0.33
Kapell 1951		12	0.76	3	0.10	5	0.16	9	0.52	3	0.45	12	0.48
Kissin 1993		3	0.81	5	0.06	7	0.15	5	0.55	5	0.54	5	0.54
Kushner 1989		17	0.71	11	0.02	25	0.06	31	0.25	27	0.30	31	0.27
Luisada 1991		39	0.62	35	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	53	0.06	58	0.06
Lushtak 2004		60	0.56	53	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.17	32	0.17	41	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		52	0.58	13	0.02	62	0.05	64	0.05	43	0.13	55	0.08
Magaloff 1978		76	0.43	56	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.04	82	0.03
Magin 1975		15	0.74	12	0.02	18	0.09	18	0.42	18	0.40	20	0.41
Michalowski 1933		14	0.74	21	0.01	17	0.19	15	0.46	5	0.57	9	0.51
Milkina 1970		33	0.64	14	0.02	50	0.06	50	0.06	58	0.04	67	0.05
Mohovich 1999		53	0.58	32	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.14	39	0.21	42	0.17
Moravec 1969		77	0.43	66	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	67	0.04	80	0.03
Morozova 2008		27	0.67	28	0.01	27	0.06	34	0.23	27	0.27	35	0.25
Neighaus 1950		22	0.70	16	0.01	11	0.10	10	0.49	13	0.46	15	0.47
Niedzielski 1931		24	0.68	82	0.00	45	0.05	62	0.05	34	0.25	49	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.62	8	0.04	12	0.11	16	0.45	11	0.46	16	0.45
Osinska 1989		26	0.67	45	0.00	28	0.05	35	0.19	43	0.13	43	0.16
Pachmann 1927		37	0.63	42	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	7	0.46	45	0.15
Paderewski 1930		59	0.57	49	0.00	51	0.04	71	0.04	29	0.24	51	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		34	0.64	69	0.00	21	0.05	25	0.34	17	0.33	25	0.33
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.43	58	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.06	73	0.04
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rabcewiczowa 1932		57	0.57	37	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	50	0.05	66	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.57	74	0.00	57	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.04
Rangell 2001		73	0.44	26	0.01	70	0.05	58	0.05	42	0.13	56	0.08
Richter 1976		8	0.79	10	0.02	10	0.11	13	0.47	1	0.67	2	0.56
Rosen 1989		30	0.66	40	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	44	0.07	60	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		32	0.65	61	0.00	58	0.04	67	0.04	12	0.33	50	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		66	0.48	86	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	75	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.47	88	0.00	84	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.50	43	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.04	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		69	0.47	83	0.00	85	0.04	74	0.04	57	0.05	77	0.04
Rossi 2007		86	0.27	47	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.03	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.43	34	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	50	0.06	74	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.36	17	0.01	79	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.05	79	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		81	0.37	36	0.00	78	0.04	69	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		2	0.84	1	0.14	1	0.14	6	0.55	3	0.60	1	0.57
Shebanova 2002		9	0.79	9	0.03	6	0.24	2	0.60	7	0.48	6	0.54
Smith 1975		58	0.57	39	0.00	68	0.07	45	0.07	72	0.04	65	0.05
Sokolov 2002		61	0.55	29	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	22	0.28	39	0.18
Sztompka 1959		13	0.74	20	0.01	14	0.13	12	0.48	13	0.41	18	0.44
Tomsic 1995		70	0.45	57	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	56	0.06	75	0.04
Uninsky 1932		7	0.80	63	0.00	16	0.20	17	0.44	9	0.50	14	0.47
Uninsky 1971		1	0.85	6	0.05	3	0.18	8	0.54	4	0.49	10	0.51
Wasowski 1980		36	0.64	19	0.01	41	0.06	41	0.14	37	0.13	46	0.13
Zak 1937		18	0.71	46	0.00	19	0.07	19	0.42	18	0.31	22	0.36
Zak 1951		21	0.70	64	0.00	20	0.05	20	0.41	19	0.30	23	0.35
Random 1		88	-0.14	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	43	0.09	86	0.03
Random 2		89	-0.15	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	28	0.18	59	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.23	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	57	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).