Perlemuter 1992

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.80	23	0.01	11	0.10	4	0.50	27	0.30	11	0.39
Anderszewski 2003		33	0.69	32	0.00	52	0.04	69	0.04	45	0.08	67	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		50	0.64	87	0.00	54	0.03	79	0.03	46	0.06	84	0.04
Bacha 2000		56	0.62	60	0.00	64	0.03	78	0.03	51	0.05	79	0.04
Badura 1965		42	0.67	19	0.01	45	0.04	56	0.04	45	0.07	75	0.05
Barbosa 1983		68	0.58	74	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	29	0.17	60	0.07
Biret 1990		4	0.77	24	0.01	10	0.09	8	0.47	5	0.55	3	0.51
Blet 2003		17	0.73	58	0.00	21	0.06	21	0.29	4	0.46	13	0.37
Block 1995		60	0.60	30	0.01	61	0.04	65	0.04	41	0.10	69	0.06
Blumental 1952		25	0.70	25	0.01	33	0.07	32	0.21	24	0.19	35	0.20
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.66	38	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	44	0.13	45	0.11
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.66	37	0.00	67	0.04	53	0.04	36	0.18	53	0.08
Bunin 1987		78	0.51	77	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	37	0.22	51	0.09
Bunin 1987b		79	0.48	59	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	37	0.23	55	0.08
Chiu 1999		28	0.70	73	0.00	47	0.04	66	0.04	40	0.14	57	0.07
Cohen 1997		72	0.55	69	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	12	0.38	46	0.11
Cortot 1951		34	0.69	56	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.14	23	0.39	31	0.23
Csalog 1996		77	0.52	42	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.13	14	0.38	32	0.22
Czerny 1949		46	0.65	17	0.01	28	0.06	43	0.12	72	0.04	62	0.07
Czerny 1990		19	0.72	57	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.21	31	0.16	39	0.18
Duchoud 2007		75	0.54	78	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	51	0.05	83	0.04
Ezaki 2006		23	0.70	90	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	53	0.04	78	0.04
Falvay 1989		55	0.62	4	0.05	46	0.04	57	0.04	34	0.36	43	0.12
Farrell 1958		38	0.69	9	0.03	19	0.09	19	0.32	24	0.35	19	0.33
Ferenczy 1958		20	0.70	12	0.03	16	0.08	29	0.23	10	0.43	21	0.31
Fliere 1977		14	0.74	16	0.01	9	0.08	5	0.48	30	0.21	20	0.32
Fou 1978		1	0.81	5	0.05	5	0.08	6	0.48	7	0.47	6	0.47
Francois 1956		21	0.70	33	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.14	14	0.45	28	0.25
Friedman 1923		57	0.61	66	0.00	78	0.04	54	0.04	52	0.06	77	0.05
Friedman 1923b		61	0.60	68	0.00	79	0.04	52	0.04	54	0.05	85	0.04
Friedman 1930		58	0.60	64	0.00	81	0.04	70	0.04	53	0.06	73	0.05
Garcia 2007		5	0.77	2	0.12	3	0.14	2	0.58	3	0.62	1	0.60
Garcia 2007b		18	0.73	14	0.02	8	0.08	3	0.51	4	0.60	2	0.55
Gierzod 1998		29	0.70	83	0.00	29	0.08	18	0.32	40	0.15	34	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.60	20	0.01	53	0.05	48	0.05	36	0.11	63	0.07
Groot 1988		36	0.69	13	0.02	20	0.09	25	0.26	9	0.48	16	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.74	84	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.19	47	0.06	47	0.11
Hatto 1993		48	0.65	79	0.00	57	0.06	45	0.06	61	0.05	76	0.05
Hatto 1997		41	0.67	75	0.00	56	0.06	46	0.06	66	0.04	74	0.05
Horowitz 1949		51	0.64	81	0.00	60	0.05	50	0.05	46	0.09	59	0.07
Indjic 1988		40	0.67	76	0.00	55	0.03	72	0.03	64	0.05	82	0.04
Kapell 1951		47	0.65	10	0.03	2	0.15	12	0.46	14	0.30	12	0.37
Kissin 1993		8	0.76	28	0.01	14	0.09	13	0.46	21	0.39	9	0.42
Kushner 1989		10	0.75	18	0.01	6	0.08	7	0.47	10	0.50	5	0.48
Luisada 1991		11	0.74	29	0.01	17	0.07	15	0.34	24	0.25	22	0.29
Lushtak 2004		3	0.78	11	0.03	12	0.11	10	0.46	4	0.45	8	0.45
Malcuzynski 1961		82	0.45	46	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	61	0.04	86	0.03
Magaloff 1978		65	0.58	62	0.00	51	0.04	68	0.04	38	0.17	54	0.08
Magin 1975		70	0.55	39	0.00	58	0.04	55	0.04	52	0.05	81	0.04
Michalowski 1933		69	0.57	70	0.00	50	0.04	51	0.04	44	0.10	66	0.06
Milkina 1970		31	0.69	71	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.14	31	0.21	40	0.17
Mohovich 1999		37	0.69	34	0.00	37	0.05	35	0.17	40	0.19	38	0.18
Moravec 1969		76	0.52	65	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	36	0.19	52	0.08
Morozova 2008		24	0.70	53	0.00	30	0.05	27	0.24	24	0.29	24	0.26
Neighaus 1950		27	0.70	41	0.00	42	0.06	36	0.16	40	0.11	42	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.59	55	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.13	58	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.63	40	0.00	34	0.06	33	0.20	33	0.19	37	0.19
Osinska 1989		7	0.76	7	0.04	4	0.08	11	0.46	16	0.44	7	0.45
Pachmann 1927		49	0.64	44	0.00	77	0.04	63	0.04	33	0.16	56	0.08
Paderewski 1930		22	0.70	26	0.01	39	0.05	41	0.13	8	0.44	29	0.24
Perlemuter 1992		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.46	43	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	33	0.25	50	0.09
Poblocka 1999		52	0.64	8	0.04	7	0.08	17	0.33	25	0.34	18	0.33
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.73	15	0.02	15	0.08	14	0.38	6	0.43	10	0.40
Rachmaninoff 1923		32	0.69	3	0.06	18	0.08	30	0.23	32	0.15	36	0.19
Rangell 2001		87	0.34	54	0.00	74	0.03	85	0.03	52	0.04	88	0.03
Richter 1976		74	0.54	51	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	46	0.09	72	0.05
Rosen 1989		45	0.66	49	0.00	31	0.06	24	0.27	27	0.26	25	0.26
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.46	67	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	62	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.41	52	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	36	0.16	61	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.42	80	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	36	0.15	64	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		86	0.38	85	0.00	87	0.04	58	0.04	41	0.14	65	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.42	72	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	37	0.16	70	0.06
Rossi 2007		67	0.58	63	0.00	83	0.04	67	0.04	54	0.06	71	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.62	27	0.01	66	0.05	49	0.05	31	0.19	48	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		71	0.55	86	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	18	0.44	41	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.68	6	0.04	24	0.06	39	0.14	22	0.36	33	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.70	22	0.01	25	0.05	16	0.34	30	0.38	15	0.36
Shebanova 2002		6	0.76	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.64	14	0.39	4	0.50
Smith 1975		63	0.59	89	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.04	80	0.04
Sokolov 2002		66	0.58	47	0.00	48	0.04	64	0.04	28	0.21	49	0.09
Sztompka 1959		13	0.74	21	0.01	13	0.10	9	0.46	28	0.28	14	0.36
Tomsic 1995		73	0.55	36	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	23	0.41	44	0.11
Uninsky 1932		35	0.69	61	0.00	32	0.06	26	0.25	34	0.26	27	0.25
Uninsky 1971		59	0.60	31	0.00	22	0.06	28	0.24	33	0.33	23	0.28
Wasowski 1980		9	0.75	35	0.00	27	0.06	20	0.31	11	0.36	17	0.33
Zak 1937		16	0.73	50	0.00	23	0.06	22	0.29	28	0.22	26	0.25
Zak 1951		26	0.70	45	0.00	26	0.06	23	0.28	30	0.19	30	0.23
Random 1		89	-0.18	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	54	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.04	48	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	27	0.19	68	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.19	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	55	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).