Mohovich 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.72	39	0.00	30	0.08	23	0.43	44	0.11	35	0.22
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.70	7	0.02	21	0.06	29	0.33	10	0.37	25	0.35
Ashkenazy 1981		44	0.66	68	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	74	0.04	72	0.05
Bacha 2000		14	0.73	67	0.00	13	0.07	12	0.48	2	0.52	9	0.50
Badura 1965		75	0.54	40	0.00	72	0.04	77	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.04
Barbosa 1983		62	0.59	41	0.00	16	0.08	30	0.33	5	0.51	16	0.41
Biret 1990		5	0.78	9	0.02	7	0.15	5	0.58	6	0.54	5	0.56
Blet 2003		43	0.66	43	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	31	0.22	52	0.11
Block 1995		69	0.56	18	0.01	22	0.07	35	0.27	10	0.37	27	0.32
Blumental 1952		35	0.68	12	0.01	19	0.07	18	0.46	11	0.28	23	0.36
Boshniakovich 1969		61	0.59	64	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	58	0.05	71	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.75	28	0.00	26	0.08	32	0.30	4	0.52	18	0.39
Bunin 1987		85	0.37	65	0.00	87	0.04	80	0.04	61	0.05	82	0.04
Bunin 1987b		87	0.36	74	0.00	86	0.04	72	0.04	61	0.05	75	0.04
Chiu 1999		40	0.67	25	0.00	17	0.08	27	0.37	13	0.33	24	0.35
Cohen 1997		83	0.50	56	0.00	74	0.04	83	0.04	18	0.34	49	0.12
Cortot 1951		51	0.62	79	0.00	61	0.06	56	0.06	41	0.11	63	0.08
Csalog 1996		56	0.60	32	0.00	35	0.08	37	0.25	3	0.51	22	0.36
Czerny 1949		65	0.57	82	0.00	65	0.05	65	0.05	65	0.04	79	0.04
Czerny 1990		17	0.72	35	0.00	20	0.08	22	0.43	25	0.27	26	0.34
Duchoud 2007		71	0.56	71	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	27	0.22	56	0.10
Ezaki 2006		7	0.76	13	0.01	10	0.09	9	0.54	13	0.44	11	0.49
Falvay 1989		29	0.68	20	0.01	52	0.06	58	0.06	5	0.54	38	0.18
Farrell 1958		22	0.70	30	0.00	14	0.08	16	0.46	9	0.51	14	0.48
Ferenczy 1958		50	0.62	49	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	28	0.20	55	0.10
Fliere 1977		15	0.72	27	0.00	34	0.08	28	0.35	57	0.05	47	0.13
Fou 1978		13	0.73	15	0.01	15	0.09	10	0.52	6	0.48	10	0.50
Francois 1956		36	0.67	45	0.00	46	0.05	64	0.05	16	0.43	45	0.15
Friedman 1923		55	0.60	55	0.00	69	0.05	66	0.05	65	0.04	84	0.04
Friedman 1923b		57	0.60	69	0.00	68	0.04	84	0.04	58	0.05	83	0.04
Friedman 1930		54	0.61	87	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.03	88	0.03
Garcia 2007		45	0.65	75	0.00	51	0.08	46	0.08	44	0.13	57	0.10
Garcia 2007b		32	0.68	70	0.00	48	0.09	45	0.09	38	0.15	50	0.12
Gierzod 1998		20	0.71	22	0.01	32	0.08	26	0.38	46	0.09	40	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.67	54	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	16	0.31	36	0.19
Groot 1988		9	0.74	5	0.03	5	0.17	7	0.56	1	0.63	4	0.59
Harasiewicz 1955		42	0.66	33	0.00	41	0.09	38	0.21	48	0.06	53	0.11
Hatto 1993		67	0.57	46	0.00	62	0.06	53	0.06	68	0.04	74	0.05
Hatto 1997		60	0.59	42	0.00	63	0.06	54	0.06	57	0.05	70	0.05
Horowitz 1949		66	0.57	34	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	47	0.08	65	0.06
Indjic 1988		63	0.59	58	0.00	64	0.07	47	0.07	58	0.05	66	0.06
Kapell 1951		18	0.71	31	0.00	8	0.10	6	0.58	16	0.25	19	0.38
Kissin 1993		38	0.67	47	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.27	36	0.18	34	0.22
Kushner 1989		6	0.76	3	0.11	6	0.14	8	0.55	6	0.53	6	0.54
Luisada 1991		19	0.71	14	0.01	24	0.08	17	0.46	34	0.18	28	0.29
Lushtak 2004		27	0.69	53	0.00	23	0.06	25	0.40	10	0.34	21	0.37
Malcuzynski 1961		84	0.49	76	0.00	83	0.05	61	0.05	54	0.04	76	0.04
Magaloff 1978		41	0.66	80	0.00	53	0.07	50	0.07	25	0.27	46	0.14
Magin 1975		47	0.65	50	0.00	38	0.08	34	0.29	36	0.17	33	0.22
Michalowski 1933		73	0.56	81	0.00	79	0.03	86	0.03	68	0.04	87	0.03
Milkina 1970		1	0.82	1	0.35	1	0.35	1	0.73	2	0.63	1	0.68
Mohovich 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Moravec 1969		74	0.54	77	0.00	73	0.03	85	0.03	24	0.40	51	0.11
Morozova 2008		46	0.65	8	0.02	42	0.06	42	0.13	47	0.05	62	0.08
Neighaus 1950		28	0.68	88	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	80	0.04	73	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.57	60	0.00	59	0.06	57	0.06	45	0.05	68	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.71	19	0.01	27	0.10	11	0.52	25	0.31	17	0.40
Osinska 1989		4	0.78	6	0.03	3	0.19	4	0.66	10	0.53	3	0.59
Pachmann 1927		72	0.56	72	0.00	84	0.04	78	0.04	69	0.03	86	0.03
Paderewski 1930		52	0.62	83	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	59	0.03	85	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		26	0.69	61	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.19	35	0.17	37	0.18
Pierdomenico 2008		70	0.56	59	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	13	0.41	43	0.16
Poblocka 1999		64	0.58	11	0.01	39	0.08	39	0.21	40	0.14	41	0.17
Rabcewiczowa 1932		34	0.68	66	0.00	45	0.05	67	0.05	31	0.20	54	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		33	0.68	38	0.00	40	0.08	41	0.18	37	0.13	44	0.15
Rangell 2001		58	0.60	51	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	3	0.51	31	0.25
Richter 1976		86	0.37	57	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	49	0.06	77	0.04
Rosen 1989		2	0.80	2	0.13	2	0.23	2	0.72	3	0.60	2	0.66
Rosenthal 1930		79	0.53	84	0.00	77	0.04	81	0.04	49	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.54	63	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	29	0.22	58	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.53	89	0.00	80	0.04	82	0.04	29	0.19	60	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.51	85	0.00	81	0.04	73	0.04	33	0.19	61	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.52	90	0.00	82	0.04	76	0.04	38	0.14	64	0.07
Rossi 2007		49	0.62	48	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	9	0.51	42	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.67	37	0.00	31	0.08	33	0.30	7	0.46	20	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.63	24	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.42	3	0.57	13	0.49
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.74	4	0.07	9	0.10	15	0.47	7	0.51	12	0.49
Schilhawsky 1960		81	0.51	73	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.04
Shebanova 2002		3	0.79	16	0.01	4	0.19	3	0.72	11	0.41	8	0.54
Smith 1975		12	0.74	17	0.01	18	0.06	14	0.47	7	0.42	15	0.44
Sokolov 2002		53	0.61	21	0.01	50	0.06	51	0.06	24	0.24	48	0.12
Sztompka 1959		11	0.74	23	0.01	11	0.08	13	0.48	48	0.07	39	0.18
Tomsic 1995		31	0.68	10	0.02	12	0.06	21	0.44	2	0.66	7	0.54
Uninsky 1932		59	0.59	52	0.00	67	0.04	79	0.04	46	0.09	67	0.06
Uninsky 1971		77	0.53	44	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	56	0.06	69	0.05
Wasowski 1980		25	0.69	29	0.00	36	0.07	31	0.32	25	0.20	30	0.25
Zak 1937		23	0.70	26	0.00	29	0.10	20	0.45	41	0.13	32	0.24
Zak 1951		30	0.68	36	0.00	28	0.11	19	0.45	40	0.15	29	0.26
Random 1		90	-0.19	78	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	57	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.16	62	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.08	86	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	15	0.41	59	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).