Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		12	0.76	12	0.02	12	0.09	9	0.49	26	0.31	13	0.39
Anderszewski 2003		9	0.77	27	0.00	14	0.08	10	0.49	7	0.42	10	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		66	0.60	54	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04	83	0.04
Bacha 2000		31	0.68	13	0.02	17	0.08	23	0.33	6	0.44	16	0.38
Badura 1965		65	0.61	31	0.00	77	0.05	51	0.05	40	0.20	53	0.10
Barbosa 1983		84	0.41	8	0.03	18	0.08	37	0.18	25	0.22	37	0.20
Biret 1990		4	0.78	9	0.02	6	0.18	4	0.62	1	0.69	2	0.65
Blet 2003		35	0.67	42	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.15	26	0.28	38	0.20
Block 1995		59	0.63	82	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.19	14	0.31	34	0.24
Blumental 1952		47	0.65	4	0.06	9	0.12	26	0.31	21	0.20	33	0.25
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.67	32	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	67	0.05	70	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.70	85	0.00	59	0.04	70	0.04	22	0.31	51	0.11
Bunin 1987		86	0.31	73	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	53	0.06	72	0.05
Bunin 1987b		87	0.30	79	0.00	86	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04	76	0.04
Chiu 1999		75	0.56	69	0.00	58	0.03	72	0.03	49	0.04	87	0.03
Cohen 1997		85	0.37	34	0.00	84	0.04	66	0.04	41	0.13	58	0.07
Cortot 1951		54	0.64	70	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	53	0.04	89	0.03
Csalog 1996		76	0.56	15	0.01	69	0.03	79	0.03	18	0.34	52	0.10
Czerny 1949		46	0.65	24	0.01	45	0.07	45	0.07	53	0.05	61	0.06
Czerny 1990		10	0.77	35	0.00	11	0.09	12	0.48	10	0.45	8	0.46
Duchoud 2007		81	0.54	60	0.00	60	0.03	73	0.03	33	0.16	57	0.07
Ezaki 2006		5	0.78	7	0.04	4	0.14	5	0.57	3	0.58	5	0.57
Falvay 1989		52	0.64	53	0.00	75	0.03	80	0.03	12	0.52	49	0.12
Farrell 1958		30	0.68	71	0.00	21	0.07	16	0.41	12	0.49	9	0.45
Ferenczy 1958		73	0.57	86	0.00	83	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.03	88	0.03
Fliere 1977		18	0.73	61	0.00	22	0.07	25	0.32	61	0.04	50	0.11
Fou 1978		7	0.77	6	0.05	5	0.14	7	0.56	3	0.53	6	0.54
Francois 1956		36	0.67	56	0.00	61	0.03	71	0.03	28	0.25	56	0.09
Friedman 1923		67	0.60	64	0.00	72	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.05	86	0.04
Friedman 1923b		69	0.60	58	0.00	68	0.03	76	0.03	55	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1930		68	0.60	30	0.00	78	0.03	87	0.03	61	0.05	80	0.04
Garcia 2007		34	0.67	83	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.05
Garcia 2007b		40	0.66	80	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.05
Gierzod 1998		13	0.76	19	0.01	10	0.10	8	0.50	26	0.31	14	0.39
Gornostaeva 1994		15	0.74	44	0.00	25	0.06	20	0.38	13	0.33	20	0.35
Groot 1988		57	0.64	65	0.00	37	0.05	33	0.21	25	0.33	32	0.26
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.74	14	0.01	13	0.09	13	0.48	25	0.32	15	0.39
Hatto 1993		82	0.52	88	0.00	80	0.05	48	0.05	59	0.05	73	0.05
Hatto 1997		80	0.54	89	0.00	81	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05	67	0.05
Horowitz 1949		58	0.64	72	0.00	67	0.03	84	0.03	54	0.07	63	0.05
Indjic 1988		78	0.54	29	0.00	79	0.04	67	0.04	55	0.05	79	0.04
Kapell 1951		28	0.69	38	0.00	32	0.08	24	0.33	53	0.05	47	0.13
Kissin 1993		6	0.77	5	0.06	7	0.21	6	0.56	9	0.50	7	0.53
Kushner 1989		11	0.77	45	0.00	26	0.07	18	0.40	25	0.33	18	0.36
Luisada 1991		19	0.72	21	0.01	8	0.13	11	0.49	21	0.30	17	0.38
Lushtak 2004		74	0.57	77	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	56	0.04	81	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.69	52	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.17	11	0.39	30	0.26
Magaloff 1978		23	0.71	51	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	5	0.44	35	0.23
Magin 1975		27	0.69	37	0.00	27	0.07	21	0.34	30	0.22	27	0.27
Michalowski 1933		49	0.65	66	0.00	74	0.03	74	0.03	53	0.05	78	0.04
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		3	0.82	1	0.25	1	0.24	2	0.63	1	0.73	1	0.68
Moravec 1969		63	0.62	47	0.00	65	0.03	75	0.03	15	0.48	48	0.12
Morozova 2008		45	0.66	11	0.02	38	0.05	34	0.20	36	0.18	39	0.19
Neighaus 1950		48	0.65	36	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	56	0.05	85	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		70	0.59	87	0.00	64	0.03	85	0.03	48	0.05	75	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		43	0.66	40	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	59	0.05	60	0.06
Osinska 1989		1	0.83	2	0.12	2	0.19	3	0.62	1	0.62	4	0.62
Pachmann 1927		64	0.61	74	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	44	0.10	64	0.05
Paderewski 1930		55	0.64	90	0.00	76	0.04	68	0.04	45	0.05	77	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		26	0.69	55	0.00	39	0.06	31	0.21	40	0.14	41	0.17
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.54	50	0.00	73	0.03	83	0.03	30	0.26	54	0.09
Poblocka 1999		51	0.64	16	0.01	54	0.04	58	0.04	50	0.06	62	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		20	0.72	84	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.14	26	0.23	40	0.18
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.73	23	0.01	15	0.09	22	0.34	20	0.33	22	0.33
Rangell 2001		62	0.62	48	0.00	30	0.07	35	0.19	2	0.55	25	0.32
Richter 1976		83	0.45	20	0.01	85	0.05	53	0.05	47	0.07	59	0.06
Rosen 1989		2	0.82	3	0.10	3	0.28	1	0.64	2	0.64	3	0.64
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.64	59	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	19	0.29	55	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		39	0.66	76	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	9	0.52	45	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		44	0.66	28	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	10	0.51	46	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		60	0.63	10	0.02	57	0.06	47	0.06	10	0.47	42	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		37	0.67	46	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	9	0.53	44	0.15
Rossi 2007		22	0.71	68	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.26	3	0.60	12	0.39
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.63	39	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.21	5	0.50	24	0.32
Rubinstein 1952		77	0.55	41	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.16	8	0.52	26	0.29
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.66	22	0.01	23	0.09	30	0.26	10	0.46	19	0.35
Schilhawsky 1960		71	0.58	62	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	48	0.07	66	0.05
Shebanova 2002		14	0.75	43	0.00	24	0.09	15	0.41	41	0.16	31	0.26
Smith 1975		21	0.71	78	0.00	28	0.07	27	0.31	15	0.36	23	0.33
Sokolov 2002		50	0.64	26	0.00	36	0.05	42	0.15	23	0.26	36	0.20
Sztompka 1959		8	0.77	17	0.01	16	0.09	14	0.45	29	0.26	21	0.34
Tomsic 1995		53	0.64	67	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.29	4	0.64	11	0.43
Uninsky 1932		42	0.66	57	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	47	0.07	68	0.05
Uninsky 1971		72	0.57	18	0.01	63	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.07	65	0.05
Wasowski 1980		33	0.68	33	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.18	39	0.12	43	0.15
Zak 1937		24	0.70	25	0.01	20	0.09	19	0.40	33	0.17	29	0.26
Zak 1951		32	0.68	49	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.40	35	0.18	28	0.27
Random 1		90	-0.20	63	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	34	0.16	82	0.04
Random 2		89	-0.15	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	56	0.04	90	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.14	75	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	35	0.21	71	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).