Michalowski 1933

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.72	43	0.00	11	0.22	8	0.53	38	0.24	17	0.36
Anderszewski 2003		39	0.60	67	0.00	56	0.05	65	0.05	87	0.02	79	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.60	10	0.03	19	0.08	13	0.47	28	0.24	18	0.34
Bacha 2000		70	0.47	34	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.03	73	0.03
Badura 1965		26	0.64	26	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.37	25	0.43	11	0.40
Barbosa 1983		86	0.20	84	0.00	81	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Biret 1990		61	0.51	35	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	86	0.03	83	0.03
Blet 2003		43	0.59	64	0.00	52	0.05	62	0.05	47	0.07	52	0.06
Block 1995		71	0.46	44	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	64	0.04	68	0.04
Blumental 1952		69	0.49	58	0.00	35	0.06	39	0.15	84	0.03	48	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		1	0.78	17	0.01	9	0.13	6	0.54	20	0.46	7	0.50
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.51	47	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.03
Bunin 1987		52	0.56	27	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.28	7	0.51	13	0.38
Bunin 1987b		53	0.56	20	0.01	25	0.09	21	0.29	7	0.51	12	0.38
Chiu 1999		79	0.40	45	0.00	64	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.03	75	0.03
Cohen 1997		87	0.18	29	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		46	0.59	87	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	76	0.04	71	0.04
Csalog 1996		74	0.42	74	0.00	68	0.05	61	0.05	57	0.04	66	0.04
Czerny 1949		11	0.71	3	0.11	3	0.17	9	0.53	18	0.48	6	0.50
Czerny 1990		33	0.61	69	0.00	50	0.06	50	0.06	79	0.03	69	0.04
Duchoud 2007		56	0.55	31	0.00	45	0.07	47	0.07	15	0.31	35	0.15
Ezaki 2006		54	0.56	54	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	76	0.03	57	0.04
Falvay 1989		83	0.30	68	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.03	88	0.02
Farrell 1958		77	0.41	50	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.04	77	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		34	0.61	81	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.15	30	0.15	34	0.15
Fliere 1977		10	0.71	71	0.00	21	0.08	17	0.42	48	0.05	36	0.14
Fou 1978		32	0.61	33	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.19	58	0.04	42	0.09
Francois 1956		29	0.62	18	0.01	51	0.07	45	0.07	44	0.09	46	0.08
Friedman 1923		36	0.60	36	0.00	23	0.08	26	0.27	29	0.38	21	0.32
Friedman 1923b		40	0.60	61	0.00	24	0.08	29	0.27	31	0.37	20	0.32
Friedman 1930		27	0.64	32	0.00	27	0.09	28	0.27	26	0.41	19	0.33
Garcia 2007		28	0.63	78	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	54	0.05	47	0.07
Garcia 2007b		19	0.67	28	0.00	15	0.08	16	0.43	28	0.31	15	0.37
Gierzod 1998		13	0.69	49	0.00	20	0.08	15	0.44	45	0.09	30	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		12	0.69	48	0.00	39	0.10	32	0.20	26	0.20	31	0.20
Groot 1988		78	0.40	62	0.00	79	0.04	67	0.04	86	0.03	84	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.67	51	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.44	32	0.17	24	0.27
Hatto 1993		60	0.53	88	0.00	18	0.09	27	0.27	41	0.13	32	0.19
Hatto 1997		59	0.55	79	0.00	14	0.08	25	0.27	40	0.15	29	0.20
Horowitz 1949		24	0.65	70	0.00	28	0.11	20	0.34	27	0.41	14	0.37
Indjic 1988		57	0.55	41	0.00	12	0.09	24	0.28	41	0.16	28	0.21
Kapell 1951		16	0.69	12	0.02	13	0.09	18	0.41	34	0.13	26	0.23
Kissin 1993		23	0.65	56	0.00	37	0.09	23	0.28	62	0.04	37	0.11
Kushner 1989		20	0.67	15	0.01	40	0.08	36	0.18	73	0.04	44	0.08
Luisada 1991		62	0.51	59	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	76	0.04	59	0.04
Lushtak 2004		72	0.44	89	0.00	69	0.06	52	0.06	77	0.03	67	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.65	9	0.03	31	0.06	37	0.17	20	0.27	27	0.21
Magaloff 1978		73	0.43	37	0.00	80	0.05	60	0.05	87	0.03	61	0.04
Magin 1975		6	0.74	4	0.08	5	0.13	2	0.62	17	0.40	4	0.50
Michalowski 1933		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Milkina 1970		25	0.65	75	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	74	0.03	64	0.04
Mohovich 1999		55	0.56	80	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	86	0.03	81	0.03
Moravec 1969		75	0.41	16	0.01	76	0.04	71	0.04	59	0.05	58	0.04
Morozova 2008		49	0.57	57	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	63	0.04	56	0.05
Neighaus 1950		8	0.73	11	0.03	7	0.16	11	0.52	19	0.42	8	0.47
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.59	21	0.01	47	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.04	55	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.69	63	0.00	17	0.12	12	0.48	29	0.27	16	0.36
Osinska 1989		45	0.59	82	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	83	0.03	60	0.04
Pachmann 1927		31	0.61	42	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	26	0.25	39	0.10
Paderewski 1930		18	0.67	14	0.02	33	0.07	30	0.26	23	0.32	22	0.29
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.57	85	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	51	0.04	49	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.41	83	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	50	0.06	54	0.05
Poblocka 1999		7	0.74	5	0.08	4	0.18	5	0.57	15	0.46	3	0.51
Rabcewiczowa 1932		30	0.62	8	0.03	32	0.06	33	0.20	36	0.14	33	0.17
Rachmaninoff 1923		58	0.55	23	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	80	0.03	62	0.04
Rangell 2001		63	0.51	13	0.02	60	0.05	63	0.05	32	0.22	41	0.10
Richter 1976		42	0.59	46	0.00	29	0.08	35	0.18	22	0.45	23	0.28
Rosen 1989		17	0.68	72	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.15	41	0.08	38	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		48	0.58	65	0.00	63	0.05	64	0.05	29	0.15	43	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		66	0.51	38	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	48	0.05	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.51	40	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.50	30	0.00	72	0.03	82	0.03	47	0.05	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		67	0.50	22	0.00	75	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.05	70	0.04
Rossi 2007		81	0.32	86	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	85	0.03	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.29	52	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03	76	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		85	0.24	73	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		82	0.31	55	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.69	6	0.06	6	0.13	7	0.54	20	0.47	5	0.50
Shebanova 2002		4	0.75	24	0.00	10	0.17	10	0.53	27	0.30	10	0.40
Smith 1975		38	0.60	39	0.00	67	0.06	51	0.06	79	0.03	63	0.04
Sokolov 2002		41	0.60	19	0.01	30	0.06	31	0.26	27	0.22	25	0.24
Sztompka 1959		2	0.77	7	0.05	8	0.15	1	0.62	23	0.32	9	0.45
Tomsic 1995		80	0.32	90	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02
Uninsky 1932		3	0.75	1	0.16	1	0.16	4	0.58	8	0.52	2	0.55
Uninsky 1971		5	0.75	2	0.14	2	0.24	3	0.61	5	0.49	1	0.55
Wasowski 1980		35	0.60	66	0.00	46	0.07	48	0.07	75	0.04	53	0.05
Zak 1937		47	0.58	76	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.13	81	0.03	50	0.06
Zak 1951		50	0.57	53	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.13	78	0.03	51	0.06
Random 1		90	-0.23	25	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	49	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.06	77	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	6	0.47	40	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.06	60	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	27	0.29	45	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).