Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		4	0.78	1	0.20	1	0.19	1	0.59	8	0.46	6	0.52
Anderszewski 2003		27	0.69	6	0.04	5	0.11	12	0.46	6	0.44	12	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.75	2	0.16	2	0.16	3	0.56	1	0.62	1	0.59
Bacha 2000		79	0.47	88	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.05	72	0.04
Badura 1965		54	0.59	64	0.00	58	0.06	49	0.06	30	0.36	43	0.15
Barbosa 1983		86	0.36	41	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.04	87	0.03
Biret 1990		72	0.52	38	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.04	82	0.04
Blet 2003		53	0.59	82	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	56	0.05	78	0.04
Block 1995		55	0.58	85	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	22	0.23	57	0.11
Blumental 1952		61	0.57	8	0.03	41	0.05	41	0.10	41	0.09	65	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.75	40	0.00	19	0.08	34	0.20	29	0.34	30	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		70	0.53	80	0.00	61	0.03	78	0.03	28	0.25	63	0.09
Bunin 1987		74	0.52	48	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	18	0.45	44	0.15
Bunin 1987b		73	0.52	27	0.01	55	0.05	53	0.05	18	0.45	42	0.15
Chiu 1999		75	0.51	19	0.01	26	0.07	35	0.18	14	0.33	33	0.24
Cohen 1997		87	0.17	86	0.00	87	0.03	73	0.03	81	0.03	89	0.03
Cortot 1951		50	0.60	73	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	47	0.05	83	0.04
Csalog 1996		82	0.43	45	0.00	83	0.03	87	0.03	61	0.04	88	0.03
Czerny 1949		32	0.68	18	0.02	7	0.09	19	0.40	20	0.47	16	0.43
Czerny 1990		24	0.70	32	0.00	29	0.08	21	0.39	20	0.31	22	0.35
Duchoud 2007		33	0.67	33	0.00	21	0.06	22	0.35	2	0.61	11	0.46
Ezaki 2006		15	0.73	67	0.00	14	0.11	16	0.42	12	0.47	14	0.44
Falvay 1989		83	0.42	81	0.00	86	0.04	65	0.04	50	0.08	69	0.06
Farrell 1958		64	0.55	87	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	54	0.06	71	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.53	57	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	52	0.05	80	0.04
Fliere 1977		3	0.78	21	0.01	12	0.12	9	0.50	22	0.35	17	0.42
Fou 1978		40	0.65	17	0.02	31	0.07	25	0.30	25	0.27	27	0.28
Francois 1956		62	0.56	29	0.01	32	0.06	38	0.15	22	0.34	34	0.23
Friedman 1923		42	0.65	72	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.08	32	0.37	40	0.17
Friedman 1923b		41	0.65	46	0.00	45	0.04	60	0.04	32	0.36	53	0.12
Friedman 1930		36	0.66	58	0.00	44	0.03	47	0.07	28	0.40	39	0.17
Garcia 2007		17	0.73	75	0.00	37	0.09	32	0.22	19	0.38	26	0.29
Garcia 2007b		29	0.69	39	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.16	31	0.26	37	0.20
Gierzod 1998		7	0.76	22	0.01	11	0.10	8	0.51	13	0.44	9	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.71	25	0.01	25	0.08	20	0.39	3	0.53	13	0.45
Groot 1988		67	0.55	56	0.00	33	0.07	39	0.15	41	0.18	41	0.16
Harasiewicz 1955		25	0.70	13	0.02	13	0.08	14	0.45	19	0.37	20	0.41
Hatto 1993		49	0.61	20	0.01	49	0.09	42	0.09	36	0.20	50	0.13
Hatto 1997		47	0.61	47	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	36	0.20	60	0.10
Horowitz 1949		38	0.66	83	0.00	51	0.07	46	0.07	30	0.39	38	0.17
Indjic 1988		45	0.61	34	0.00	47	0.04	58	0.04	36	0.20	64	0.09
Kapell 1951		22	0.71	9	0.02	35	0.07	29	0.24	46	0.06	51	0.12
Kissin 1993		5	0.78	30	0.00	16	0.11	15	0.45	18	0.40	18	0.42
Kushner 1989		16	0.73	15	0.02	20	0.08	11	0.46	14	0.47	10	0.46
Luisada 1991		11	0.74	54	0.00	15	0.08	13	0.46	12	0.35	21	0.40
Lushtak 2004		69	0.54	55	0.00	65	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.05	81	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		46	0.61	42	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	29	0.23	59	0.10
Magaloff 1978		76	0.50	51	0.00	72	0.03	84	0.03	51	0.06	75	0.04
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Michalowski 1933		10	0.74	26	0.01	17	0.08	17	0.40	2	0.62	7	0.50
Milkina 1970		26	0.69	74	0.00	36	0.07	30	0.22	21	0.34	29	0.27
Mohovich 1999		43	0.65	49	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.17	34	0.29	35	0.22
Moravec 1969		81	0.46	24	0.01	84	0.03	80	0.03	60	0.04	84	0.03
Morozova 2008		2	0.78	14	0.02	10	0.11	4	0.54	1	0.57	3	0.55
Neighaus 1950		39	0.66	76	0.00	24	0.07	26	0.28	29	0.28	28	0.28
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.66	71	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	32	0.26	47	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.72	3	0.08	3	0.11	10	0.50	5	0.58	4	0.54
Osinska 1989		35	0.67	53	0.00	46	0.04	70	0.04	51	0.05	74	0.04
Pachmann 1927		58	0.58	52	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	10	0.42	48	0.13
Paderewski 1930		63	0.56	77	0.00	73	0.03	86	0.03	51	0.04	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		66	0.55	43	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.04	73	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.60	37	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	8	0.45	46	0.13
Poblocka 1999		13	0.74	10	0.02	23	0.08	18	0.40	18	0.42	19	0.41
Rabcewiczowa 1932		57	0.58	12	0.02	40	0.06	40	0.11	38	0.12	55	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.69	11	0.02	8	0.12	5	0.54	3	0.51	5	0.52
Rangell 2001		68	0.54	35	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	12	0.40	49	0.13
Richter 1976		48	0.61	31	0.00	67	0.04	61	0.04	29	0.38	52	0.12
Rosen 1989		1	0.80	4	0.05	6	0.11	2	0.58	4	0.58	2	0.58
Rosenthal 1930		51	0.60	36	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	24	0.24	61	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		56	0.58	23	0.01	75	0.05	56	0.05	17	0.40	45	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		59	0.57	60	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	18	0.39	58	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.55	79	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	22	0.31	62	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.57	59	0.00	76	0.04	64	0.04	17	0.38	54	0.12
Rossi 2007		85	0.38	61	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		77	0.50	65	0.00	79	0.03	74	0.03	49	0.06	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.40	16	0.02	42	0.04	44	0.08	65	0.05	70	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		78	0.47	28	0.01	78	0.03	82	0.03	51	0.05	79	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		31	0.68	44	0.00	22	0.06	31	0.22	29	0.42	25	0.30
Shebanova 2002		12	0.74	7	0.04	4	0.15	7	0.52	18	0.37	15	0.44
Smith 1975		14	0.73	5	0.05	18	0.07	28	0.25	13	0.37	24	0.30
Sokolov 2002		44	0.64	62	0.00	30	0.08	27	0.26	10	0.39	23	0.32
Sztompka 1959		6	0.77	66	0.00	9	0.12	6	0.54	15	0.41	8	0.47
Tomsic 1995		80	0.47	70	0.00	85	0.03	72	0.03	55	0.06	77	0.04
Uninsky 1932		21	0.72	68	0.00	34	0.06	33	0.21	29	0.29	32	0.25
Uninsky 1971		30	0.68	78	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	39	0.26	56	0.11
Wasowski 1980		34	0.67	63	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.09	68	0.07
Zak 1937		20	0.72	69	0.00	28	0.08	24	0.32	39	0.14	36	0.21
Zak 1951		18	0.73	50	0.00	27	0.08	23	0.35	37	0.18	31	0.25
Random 1		90	-0.31	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.10	89	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	14	0.32	66	0.08
Random 3		88	-0.08	90	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	24	0.32	67	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).