Luisada 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		3	0.82	10	0.02	5	0.14	3	0.55	9	0.46	4	0.50
Anderszewski 2003		16	0.76	12	0.01	15	0.05	19	0.31	15	0.31	28	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		22	0.75	9	0.02	17	0.07	18	0.32	18	0.33	25	0.32
Bacha 2000		53	0.65	24	0.01	26	0.05	36	0.16	9	0.41	35	0.26
Badura 1965		44	0.68	45	0.00	61	0.06	50	0.06	31	0.35	42	0.14
Barbosa 1983		40	0.69	28	0.00	42	0.06	37	0.15	4	0.52	32	0.28
Biret 1990		39	0.69	15	0.01	52	0.07	47	0.07	26	0.24	47	0.13
Blet 2003		31	0.74	52	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.17	6	0.46	33	0.28
Block 1995		58	0.62	77	0.00	38	0.05	42	0.12	12	0.32	40	0.20
Blumental 1952		41	0.69	13	0.01	43	0.05	43	0.10	33	0.13	56	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		47	0.67	16	0.01	48	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.17	61	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		42	0.69	11	0.02	30	0.06	33	0.20	1	0.65	18	0.36
Bunin 1987		82	0.41	55	0.00	87	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.05	81	0.04
Bunin 1987b		84	0.40	67	0.00	86	0.04	68	0.04	59	0.05	76	0.04
Chiu 1999		19	0.76	14	0.01	21	0.08	22	0.30	3	0.45	16	0.37
Cohen 1997		72	0.51	78	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	35	0.21	64	0.08
Cortot 1951		65	0.59	56	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.04
Csalog 1996		86	0.39	57	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	39	0.12	69	0.07
Czerny 1949		52	0.65	88	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	47	0.07	72	0.06
Czerny 1990		20	0.75	79	0.00	25	0.05	28	0.24	17	0.35	31	0.29
Duchoud 2007		75	0.50	34	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	55	0.05	80	0.04
Ezaki 2006		1	0.84	4	0.07	4	0.17	7	0.42	10	0.51	6	0.46
Falvay 1989		70	0.53	37	0.00	79	0.04	73	0.04	42	0.21	60	0.09
Farrell 1958		37	0.71	74	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	37	0.19	57	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.66	21	0.01	50	0.05	58	0.05	16	0.36	45	0.13
Fliere 1977		4	0.82	2	0.15	2	0.19	2	0.65	10	0.46	2	0.55
Fou 1978		18	0.76	44	0.00	35	0.05	30	0.21	18	0.34	34	0.27
Francois 1956		63	0.59	80	0.00	64	0.06	48	0.06	29	0.24	51	0.12
Friedman 1923		5	0.80	7	0.05	13	0.08	14	0.35	17	0.48	12	0.41
Friedman 1923b		6	0.80	41	0.00	14	0.09	13	0.35	18	0.47	11	0.41
Friedman 1930		15	0.76	53	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.30	20	0.45	17	0.37
Garcia 2007		43	0.69	89	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	50	0.06	74	0.05
Garcia 2007b		46	0.68	73	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	33	0.24	52	0.12
Gierzod 1998		25	0.74	5	0.06	8	0.12	6	0.46	19	0.40	8	0.43
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.63	32	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.13	9	0.40	38	0.23
Groot 1988		57	0.62	58	0.00	63	0.07	46	0.07	36	0.24	48	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.75	62	0.00	36	0.05	40	0.13	61	0.05	65	0.08
Hatto 1993		11	0.79	75	0.00	18	0.07	15	0.34	21	0.31	26	0.32
Hatto 1997		10	0.79	68	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.33	22	0.31	24	0.32
Horowitz 1949		59	0.62	43	0.00	65	0.05	57	0.05	45	0.09	67	0.07
Indjic 1988		9	0.80	76	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.34	21	0.32	21	0.33
Kapell 1951		60	0.62	38	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.15	58	0.04	62	0.08
Kissin 1993		13	0.78	8	0.04	6	0.11	5	0.47	14	0.47	5	0.47
Kushner 1989		30	0.74	47	0.00	27	0.05	23	0.26	19	0.40	22	0.32
Luisada 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Lushtak 2004		14	0.77	17	0.01	34	0.06	32	0.21	19	0.28	36	0.24
Malcuzynski 1961		83	0.41	82	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.04	85	0.03
Magaloff 1978		55	0.63	30	0.00	56	0.05	63	0.05	14	0.37	41	0.14
Magin 1975		27	0.74	18	0.01	16	0.08	12	0.35	13	0.46	13	0.40
Michalowski 1933		73	0.51	69	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	58	0.05	79	0.04
Milkina 1970		33	0.72	25	0.01	9	0.09	21	0.30	11	0.49	15	0.38
Mohovich 1999		35	0.71	35	0.00	39	0.05	34	0.18	17	0.46	30	0.29
Moravec 1969		77	0.44	70	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.04	84	0.03
Morozova 2008		2	0.84	3	0.09	3	0.13	4	0.48	3	0.55	3	0.51
Neighaus 1950		45	0.68	90	0.00	47	0.06	54	0.06	34	0.16	58	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		48	0.67	59	0.00	46	0.04	65	0.04	23	0.41	44	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.66	27	0.00	45	0.04	64	0.04	39	0.15	63	0.08
Osinska 1989		24	0.75	49	0.00	23	0.07	8	0.42	17	0.44	7	0.43
Pachmann 1927		68	0.57	72	0.00	78	0.04	69	0.04	23	0.28	54	0.11
Paderewski 1930		67	0.57	84	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	49	0.04	78	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		28	0.74	60	0.00	24	0.06	24	0.25	15	0.34	29	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.49	31	0.00	73	0.03	84	0.03	48	0.06	75	0.04
Poblocka 1999		61	0.62	29	0.00	58	0.06	53	0.06	51	0.06	71	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		54	0.64	46	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	23	0.26	49	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		36	0.71	23	0.01	44	0.04	44	0.09	30	0.20	43	0.13
Rangell 2001		87	0.32	85	0.00	74	0.03	86	0.03	60	0.04	88	0.03
Richter 1976		71	0.53	66	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.05	77	0.04
Rosen 1989		7	0.80	1	0.25	1	0.25	1	0.67	1	0.66	1	0.66
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.42	83	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	48	0.05	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.42	71	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	37	0.16	68	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.41	50	0.00	84	0.04	70	0.04	61	0.05	83	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.39	63	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	35	0.19	66	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.42	81	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	41	0.12	73	0.06
Rossi 2007		62	0.61	54	0.00	66	0.04	71	0.04	24	0.30	53	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		23	0.75	19	0.01	31	0.06	29	0.22	4	0.54	19	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		69	0.57	6	0.05	10	0.09	41	0.13	17	0.45	37	0.24
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.74	42	0.00	28	0.05	31	0.21	8	0.49	23	0.32
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.66	48	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	45	0.09	70	0.07
Shebanova 2002		32	0.73	20	0.01	7	0.12	10	0.41	19	0.37	14	0.39
Smith 1975		34	0.71	22	0.01	29	0.05	27	0.24	6	0.45	20	0.33
Sokolov 2002		66	0.58	36	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	38	0.15	59	0.09
Sztompka 1959		29	0.74	64	0.00	33	0.07	25	0.25	39	0.16	39	0.20
Tomsic 1995		74	0.50	86	0.00	71	0.04	75	0.04	28	0.35	50	0.12
Uninsky 1932		38	0.70	39	0.00	49	0.07	45	0.07	35	0.25	46	0.13
Uninsky 1971		64	0.59	26	0.01	60	0.06	52	0.06	40	0.22	55	0.11
Wasowski 1980		17	0.76	87	0.00	32	0.07	26	0.25	9	0.38	27	0.31
Zak 1937		8	0.80	33	0.00	12	0.14	9	0.41	9	0.43	9	0.42
Zak 1951		12	0.79	40	0.00	11	0.11	11	0.40	9	0.43	10	0.41
Random 1		90	-0.34	61	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01	89	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.05	51	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	50	0.04	86	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.23	65	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	76	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).