Kushner 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.77	68	0.00	18	0.11	20	0.40	41	0.19	29	0.28
Anderszewski 2003		21	0.74	15	0.01	25	0.08	26	0.31	17	0.30	27	0.30
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.68	24	0.00	27	0.06	28	0.30	30	0.23	35	0.26
Bacha 2000		61	0.61	70	0.00	48	0.04	67	0.04	28	0.16	54	0.08
Badura 1965		53	0.63	47	0.00	65	0.05	53	0.05	39	0.23	46	0.11
Barbosa 1983		82	0.50	66	0.00	50	0.04	64	0.04	24	0.22	50	0.09
Biret 1990		23	0.73	11	0.02	12	0.15	3	0.55	7	0.53	6	0.54
Blet 2003		28	0.71	86	0.00	34	0.04	33	0.21	20	0.34	32	0.27
Block 1995		71	0.58	37	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	27	0.18	52	0.09
Blumental 1952		57	0.62	55	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.11	67	0.04	61	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		34	0.69	44	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	49	0.06	66	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.66	71	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	35	0.21	49	0.09
Bunin 1987		85	0.44	79	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	47	0.07	72	0.05
Bunin 1987b		86	0.42	57	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	51	0.06	78	0.04
Chiu 1999		64	0.60	48	0.00	38	0.06	40	0.12	33	0.21	41	0.16
Cohen 1997		87	0.40	59	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	39	0.16	62	0.07
Cortot 1951		69	0.58	67	0.00	79	0.05	55	0.05	82	0.03	84	0.04
Csalog 1996		70	0.58	36	0.00	31	0.04	43	0.11	9	0.42	38	0.21
Czerny 1949		38	0.69	46	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.06	71	0.05
Czerny 1990		3	0.80	30	0.00	17	0.12	12	0.48	18	0.34	16	0.40
Duchoud 2007		78	0.55	58	0.00	67	0.05	62	0.05	40	0.13	57	0.08
Ezaki 2006		36	0.69	52	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	55	0.04	75	0.04
Falvay 1989		51	0.64	16	0.01	56	0.05	58	0.05	10	0.52	42	0.16
Farrell 1958		39	0.68	25	0.00	29	0.06	24	0.33	13	0.48	15	0.40
Ferenczy 1958		67	0.59	72	0.00	78	0.04	71	0.04	61	0.04	83	0.04
Fliere 1977		4	0.80	53	0.00	16	0.10	18	0.43	31	0.21	25	0.30
Fou 1978		17	0.75	3	0.13	3	0.15	8	0.53	1	0.60	2	0.56
Francois 1956		12	0.76	5	0.06	9	0.12	13	0.47	4	0.56	9	0.51
Friedman 1923		58	0.61	73	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	51	0.06	85	0.04
Friedman 1923b		60	0.61	82	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.04	89	0.03
Friedman 1930		56	0.62	61	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	51	0.06	82	0.04
Garcia 2007		33	0.69	60	0.00	36	0.06	29	0.30	23	0.35	23	0.32
Garcia 2007b		45	0.66	38	0.00	37	0.08	31	0.24	29	0.30	33	0.27
Gierzod 1998		5	0.78	45	0.00	19	0.12	17	0.43	27	0.28	19	0.35
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.69	65	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	23	0.23	47	0.11
Groot 1988		59	0.61	40	0.00	32	0.04	36	0.16	20	0.37	36	0.24
Harasiewicz 1955		41	0.68	14	0.01	46	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.05	74	0.05
Hatto 1993		52	0.64	83	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	62	0.05	73	0.05
Hatto 1997		47	0.66	75	0.00	53	0.08	45	0.08	46	0.07	60	0.07
Horowitz 1949		79	0.55	63	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	59	0.05	79	0.04
Indjic 1988		46	0.66	69	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	45	0.07	63	0.06
Kapell 1951		25	0.73	39	0.00	13	0.13	15	0.47	20	0.23	20	0.33
Kissin 1993		11	0.76	18	0.01	21	0.10	21	0.38	27	0.26	24	0.31
Kushner 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991		20	0.74	26	0.00	15	0.10	19	0.40	23	0.26	21	0.32
Lushtak 2004		16	0.76	6	0.06	5	0.19	4	0.55	1	0.54	4	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		83	0.50	76	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	65	0.04	87	0.03
Magaloff 1978		55	0.63	87	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	49	0.07	67	0.05
Magin 1975		24	0.73	12	0.02	10	0.14	14	0.47	11	0.46	11	0.46
Michalowski 1933		43	0.67	81	0.00	58	0.04	73	0.04	36	0.18	56	0.08
Milkina 1970		9	0.77	43	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.33	18	0.40	18	0.36
Mohovich 1999		14	0.76	10	0.02	6	0.12	6	0.53	8	0.55	5	0.54
Moravec 1969		80	0.51	64	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	62	0.04	86	0.03
Morozova 2008		10	0.76	4	0.07	4	0.15	9	0.52	5	0.52	8	0.52
Neighaus 1950		26	0.71	77	0.00	30	0.05	32	0.21	39	0.13	40	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		49	0.65	80	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.04	77	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.76	17	0.01	14	0.14	7	0.53	15	0.40	12	0.46
Osinska 1989		15	0.76	19	0.01	20	0.13	11	0.48	22	0.36	14	0.42
Pachmann 1927		29	0.71	78	0.00	40	0.06	37	0.15	6	0.46	34	0.26
Paderewski 1930		31	0.70	54	0.00	35	0.05	30	0.29	3	0.53	17	0.39
Perlemuter 1992		19	0.75	31	0.00	11	0.12	10	0.50	7	0.47	10	0.48
Pierdomenico 2008		62	0.61	27	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.19	3	0.55	22	0.32
Poblocka 1999		27	0.71	8	0.03	28	0.05	27	0.30	31	0.25	31	0.27
Rabcewiczowa 1932		7	0.77	7	0.03	8	0.15	5	0.55	1	0.59	1	0.57
Rachmaninoff 1923		37	0.69	88	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.17	55	0.04	55	0.08
Rangell 2001		75	0.57	13	0.02	26	0.06	38	0.14	1	0.57	30	0.28
Richter 1976		84	0.49	56	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	48	0.07	80	0.04
Rosen 1989		8	0.77	9	0.03	7	0.11	16	0.47	12	0.46	13	0.46
Rosenthal 1930		66	0.59	84	0.00	70	0.04	75	0.04	42	0.09	65	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.57	42	0.00	74	0.05	59	0.05	33	0.17	51	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		72	0.58	23	0.00	73	0.05	63	0.05	34	0.17	53	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.56	49	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	29	0.23	59	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.57	34	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	31	0.19	58	0.08
Rossi 2007		81	0.50	35	0.00	87	0.04	74	0.04	58	0.05	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		63	0.60	74	0.00	69	0.05	52	0.05	51	0.05	68	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		76	0.57	29	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	12	0.49	43	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		30	0.70	22	0.01	44	0.06	42	0.11	13	0.46	37	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960		44	0.66	50	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05	69	0.05
Shebanova 2002		1	0.83	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.62	10	0.45	7	0.53
Smith 1975		32	0.70	20	0.01	43	0.05	41	0.12	29	0.20	44	0.15
Sokolov 2002		50	0.64	32	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.14	21	0.28	39	0.20
Sztompka 1959		2	0.81	2	0.14	2	0.27	2	0.60	7	0.50	3	0.55
Tomsic 1995		65	0.60	33	0.00	61	0.04	72	0.04	12	0.52	45	0.14
Uninsky 1932		54	0.63	41	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	49	0.07	70	0.05
Uninsky 1971		68	0.59	62	0.00	68	0.05	61	0.05	67	0.04	81	0.04
Wasowski 1980		42	0.67	51	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	38	0.13	48	0.09
Zak 1937		18	0.75	21	0.01	23	0.09	23	0.35	27	0.22	28	0.28
Zak 1951		22	0.74	28	0.00	22	0.10	22	0.37	24	0.25	26	0.30
Random 1		90	-0.28	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.10	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	26	0.21	64	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.18	85	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	46	0.06	88	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).