Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.78	28	0.00	12	0.12	14	0.45	21	0.39	14	0.42
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.70	29	0.00	25	0.07	23	0.30	30	0.24	28	0.27
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.76	30	0.00	18	0.12	27	0.28	16	0.36	22	0.32
Bacha 2000		48	0.60	31	0.00	57	0.06	53	0.06	41	0.10	51	0.08
Badura 1965		13	0.75	32	0.00	28	0.06	20	0.31	6	0.59	13	0.43
Barbosa 1983		44	0.61	3	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	34	0.13	54	0.07
Biret 1990		51	0.59	11	0.00	56	0.06	55	0.06	51	0.05	67	0.05
Blet 2003		37	0.65	33	0.00	38	0.06	32	0.22	12	0.38	27	0.29
Block 1995		70	0.48	34	0.00	30	0.05	43	0.10	71	0.04	59	0.06
Blumental 1952		39	0.64	35	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	50	0.05	65	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		28	0.67	8	0.00	10	0.10	10	0.50	12	0.54	8	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.51	36	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987		73	0.45	37	0.00	67	0.04	75	0.04	35	0.23	49	0.10
Bunin 1987b		74	0.44	38	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	35	0.23	47	0.10
Chiu 1999		23	0.70	39	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.17	31	0.23	34	0.20
Cohen 1997		59	0.55	40	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	26	0.27	48	0.10
Cortot 1951		52	0.59	41	0.00	55	0.06	46	0.06	33	0.22	46	0.11
Csalog 1996		81	0.30	16	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.04	76	0.04
Czerny 1949		19	0.72	17	0.00	19	0.15	8	0.53	23	0.46	9	0.49
Czerny 1990		20	0.72	42	0.00	37	0.08	30	0.25	37	0.13	39	0.18
Duchoud 2007		63	0.51	43	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	45	0.08	58	0.06
Ezaki 2006		14	0.74	12	0.00	29	0.06	35	0.21	34	0.20	33	0.20
Falvay 1989		82	0.27	18	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.02	88	0.02
Farrell 1958		36	0.65	44	0.00	58	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.60	45	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	23	0.31	42	0.14
Fliere 1977		6	0.80	13	0.00	4	0.19	5	0.58	9	0.46	7	0.52
Fou 1978		35	0.65	19	0.00	46	0.06	57	0.06	45	0.06	56	0.06
Francois 1956		68	0.49	20	0.00	71	0.04	77	0.04	84	0.02	87	0.03
Friedman 1923		4	0.86	21	0.00	5	0.27	4	0.64	5	0.69	4	0.66
Friedman 1923b		3	0.86	46	0.00	3	0.22	3	0.65	5	0.69	3	0.67
Friedman 1930		5	0.81	47	0.00	6	0.27	6	0.58	5	0.64	5	0.61
Garcia 2007		31	0.67	48	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.17	35	0.20	38	0.18
Garcia 2007b		43	0.62	49	0.00	32	0.05	26	0.29	25	0.35	23	0.32
Gierzod 1998		18	0.72	9	0.00	11	0.09	11	0.49	17	0.41	12	0.45
Gornostaeva 1994		72	0.46	50	0.00	65	0.05	63	0.05	76	0.03	78	0.04
Groot 1988		69	0.49	51	0.00	68	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.06	79	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.74	14	0.00	36	0.09	31	0.24	40	0.12	40	0.17
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	1.00	2	0.32	2	0.97	2	1.00	2	1.00	2	1.00
Horowitz 1949		49	0.60	52	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	35	0.35	41	0.16
Indjic 1988		1	1.00	1	0.68	1	0.67	1	1.00	2	1.00	1	1.00
Kapell 1951		58	0.56	22	0.00	23	0.08	25	0.29	38	0.12	35	0.19
Kissin 1993		33	0.66	53	0.00	26	0.06	29	0.28	33	0.20	30	0.24
Kushner 1989		40	0.64	54	0.00	50	0.05	62	0.05	47	0.06	63	0.05
Luisada 1991		7	0.79	55	0.00	14	0.08	21	0.31	15	0.34	20	0.32
Lushtak 2004		15	0.74	56	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.21	21	0.27	31	0.24
Malcuzynski 1961		77	0.33	10	0.00	49	0.06	58	0.06	48	0.06	57	0.06
Magaloff 1978		67	0.49	5	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	53	0.06	62	0.05
Magin 1975		46	0.61	57	0.00	27	0.06	36	0.20	42	0.09	44	0.13
Michalowski 1933		60	0.53	58	0.00	33	0.06	41	0.13	27	0.27	36	0.19
Milkina 1970		61	0.52	59	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	48	0.05	64	0.05
Mohovich 1999		55	0.57	60	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	53	0.06	66	0.05
Moravec 1969		79	0.30	61	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03
Morozova 2008		8	0.79	4	0.00	9	0.11	17	0.38	13	0.43	15	0.40
Neighaus 1950		21	0.71	23	0.00	7	0.20	7	0.56	6	0.56	6	0.56
Niedzielski 1931		41	0.64	62	0.00	34	0.05	33	0.22	19	0.45	24	0.31
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.71	7	0.00	20	0.07	24	0.30	24	0.32	25	0.31
Osinska 1989		27	0.68	24	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.28	47	0.06	43	0.13
Pachmann 1927		71	0.47	25	0.00	75	0.05	64	0.05	51	0.04	75	0.04
Paderewski 1930		54	0.57	63	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.14	13	0.41	29	0.24
Perlemuter 1992		38	0.65	64	0.00	52	0.05	61	0.05	45	0.06	60	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.32	65	0.00	79	0.04	76	0.04	66	0.04	71	0.04
Poblocka 1999		53	0.58	66	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.30	26	0.34	21	0.32
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.50	6	0.00	70	0.03	79	0.03	53	0.05	72	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.65	67	0.00	51	0.06	54	0.06	46	0.06	55	0.06
Rangell 2001		87	0.15	68	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		57	0.56	69	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	17	0.50	32	0.22
Rosen 1989		45	0.61	70	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.14	49	0.06	50	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.35	71	0.00	77	0.06	56	0.06	66	0.03	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.22	72	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	67	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.23	73	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	67	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		83	0.25	74	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	67	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.23	75	0.00	86	0.04	78	0.04	76	0.03	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		65	0.51	76	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	74	0.04	69	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.67	77	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	27	0.23	45	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		75	0.37	78	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	54	0.06	68	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.69	79	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.12	32	0.27	37	0.18
Schilhawsky 1960		17	0.74	15	0.00	17	0.10	12	0.47	22	0.46	11	0.46
Shebanova 2002		30	0.67	26	0.00	13	0.09	13	0.47	30	0.28	17	0.36
Smith 1975		56	0.57	80	0.00	61	0.06	49	0.06	86	0.03	70	0.04
Sokolov 2002		62	0.52	81	0.00	60	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.05	61	0.05
Sztompka 1959		26	0.69	82	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.37	34	0.22	26	0.29
Tomsic 1995		80	0.30	83	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.05	74	0.04
Uninsky 1932		42	0.62	84	0.00	24	0.10	19	0.34	26	0.32	19	0.33
Uninsky 1971		50	0.60	85	0.00	8	0.15	9	0.51	23	0.42	10	0.46
Wasowski 1980		29	0.67	86	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	46	0.08	53	0.07
Zak 1937		11	0.76	27	0.00	16	0.10	16	0.38	14	0.33	18	0.35
Zak 1951		10	0.77	87	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.39	14	0.33	16	0.36
Random 1		89	-0.24	88	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	70	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.02	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	17	0.30	52	0.08
Random 3		90	-0.28	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).