Fou 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		4	0.78	51	0.00	13	0.10	10	0.45	37	0.26	16	0.34
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.69	68	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	44	0.11	50	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		11	0.75	14	0.02	21	0.06	26	0.25	21	0.30	24	0.27
Bacha 2000		32	0.68	64	0.00	48	0.04	75	0.04	20	0.27	49	0.10
Badura 1965		25	0.70	11	0.02	40	0.06	31	0.19	29	0.37	23	0.27
Barbosa 1983		75	0.52	37	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	38	0.11	65	0.07
Biret 1990		2	0.79	10	0.02	6	0.08	4	0.50	3	0.58	3	0.54
Blet 2003		29	0.69	72	0.00	27	0.08	19	0.34	2	0.47	13	0.40
Block 1995		69	0.57	53	0.00	50	0.03	79	0.03	34	0.14	72	0.06
Blumental 1952		16	0.74	26	0.00	17	0.08	22	0.30	8	0.32	19	0.31
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.66	79	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.18	43	0.14	34	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.60	60	0.00	73	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04	79	0.04
Bunin 1987		85	0.42	87	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	50	0.06	78	0.05
Bunin 1987b		86	0.41	82	0.00	86	0.04	68	0.04	49	0.07	75	0.05
Chiu 1999		34	0.67	70	0.00	61	0.04	51	0.04	41	0.14	64	0.07
Cohen 1997		56	0.61	48	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	5	0.48	38	0.14
Cortot 1951		58	0.60	57	0.00	67	0.04	56	0.04	49	0.05	83	0.04
Csalog 1996		76	0.50	52	0.00	69	0.05	47	0.05	26	0.28	44	0.12
Czerny 1949		65	0.58	81	0.00	45	0.04	74	0.04	50	0.06	77	0.05
Czerny 1990		31	0.69	39	0.00	37	0.04	34	0.15	58	0.04	60	0.08
Duchoud 2007		52	0.62	44	0.00	62	0.05	46	0.05	20	0.28	45	0.12
Ezaki 2006		17	0.73	30	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.12	46	0.05	56	0.08
Falvay 1989		47	0.64	19	0.01	49	0.03	78	0.03	20	0.46	41	0.12
Farrell 1958		22	0.71	54	0.00	19	0.06	21	0.33	8	0.51	12	0.41
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.61	56	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	43	0.08	70	0.06
Fliere 1977		24	0.70	17	0.01	9	0.09	11	0.45	40	0.15	25	0.26
Fou 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Francois 1956		35	0.67	69	0.00	29	0.07	32	0.18	11	0.48	20	0.29
Friedman 1923		66	0.58	63	0.00	79	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1923b		67	0.57	76	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	59	0.05	89	0.03
Friedman 1930		68	0.57	83	0.00	80	0.04	59	0.04	75	0.03	87	0.03
Garcia 2007		6	0.77	58	0.00	8	0.08	12	0.42	6	0.54	7	0.48
Garcia 2007b		15	0.74	27	0.00	14	0.08	14	0.37	17	0.42	14	0.39
Gierzod 1998		37	0.66	21	0.01	28	0.10	23	0.30	42	0.14	29	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.61	73	0.00	46	0.04	63	0.04	21	0.24	51	0.10
Groot 1988		44	0.64	55	0.00	31	0.06	39	0.11	24	0.34	31	0.19
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.74	12	0.02	18	0.12	24	0.30	58	0.05	47	0.12
Hatto 1993		41	0.65	59	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	57	0.06	73	0.06
Hatto 1997		39	0.66	65	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	44	0.10	66	0.07
Horowitz 1949		46	0.64	49	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.09	43	0.18	40	0.13
Indjic 1988		40	0.66	61	0.00	51	0.03	83	0.03	44	0.10	76	0.05
Kapell 1951		48	0.64	22	0.01	15	0.09	16	0.35	39	0.11	28	0.20
Kissin 1993		9	0.75	4	0.08	4	0.11	17	0.34	23	0.33	18	0.33
Kushner 1989		8	0.75	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.60	8	0.53	1	0.56
Luisada 1991		7	0.76	84	0.00	20	0.06	18	0.34	30	0.21	22	0.27
Lushtak 2004		20	0.72	62	0.00	26	0.06	20	0.34	11	0.34	17	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		79	0.49	86	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.03	86	0.03
Magaloff 1978		62	0.59	28	0.00	57	0.04	70	0.04	40	0.17	57	0.08
Magin 1975		42	0.65	7	0.04	22	0.06	25	0.27	25	0.30	21	0.28
Michalowski 1933		54	0.61	35	0.00	47	0.04	58	0.04	34	0.19	54	0.09
Milkina 1970		5	0.77	2	0.13	2	0.14	3	0.53	7	0.56	2	0.54
Mohovich 1999		18	0.73	8	0.02	11	0.09	6	0.48	10	0.52	4	0.50
Moravec 1969		74	0.52	34	0.00	81	0.03	86	0.03	40	0.14	68	0.06
Morozova 2008		10	0.75	50	0.00	12	0.07	13	0.41	10	0.46	11	0.43
Neighaus 1950		53	0.61	74	0.00	56	0.04	64	0.04	57	0.05	82	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.50	89	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		50	0.63	71	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	40	0.14	48	0.11
Osinska 1989		19	0.73	9	0.02	10	0.08	8	0.47	18	0.44	10	0.45
Pachmann 1927		63	0.59	77	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	14	0.37	43	0.12
Paderewski 1930		21	0.72	66	0.00	25	0.06	27	0.24	2	0.55	15	0.36
Perlemuter 1992		1	0.81	5	0.05	5	0.10	7	0.47	6	0.48	8	0.47
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.54	25	0.01	63	0.04	52	0.04	25	0.35	42	0.12
Poblocka 1999		61	0.59	40	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.21	37	0.17	30	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932		14	0.74	20	0.01	16	0.09	9	0.46	3	0.49	9	0.47
Rachmaninoff 1923		27	0.69	6	0.05	23	0.07	29	0.20	33	0.15	33	0.17
Rangell 2001		81	0.47	67	0.00	65	0.04	55	0.04	16	0.37	46	0.12
Richter 1976		78	0.49	85	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	62	0.05	80	0.04
Rosen 1989		12	0.75	42	0.00	7	0.08	5	0.50	9	0.48	5	0.49
Rosenthal 1930		80	0.48	33	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	36	0.11	71	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.43	13	0.02	84	0.03	76	0.03	32	0.20	59	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.44	15	0.02	83	0.04	57	0.04	27	0.21	55	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		87	0.41	36	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	37	0.17	67	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.44	32	0.00	85	0.04	54	0.04	32	0.18	61	0.08
Rossi 2007		49	0.63	43	0.00	71	0.03	84	0.03	25	0.29	52	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		45	0.64	41	0.00	59	0.04	71	0.04	10	0.41	39	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		64	0.59	24	0.01	54	0.05	50	0.05	9	0.52	35	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.65	18	0.01	32	0.07	40	0.11	17	0.40	27	0.21
Schilhawsky 1960		70	0.57	29	0.00	70	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.07	69	0.06
Shebanova 2002		33	0.68	47	0.00	24	0.06	15	0.36	42	0.15	26	0.23
Smith 1975		51	0.62	38	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	46	0.06	74	0.05
Sokolov 2002		59	0.60	45	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.14	63	0.07
Sztompka 1959		3	0.78	3	0.10	3	0.14	2	0.57	20	0.40	6	0.48
Tomsic 1995		71	0.55	46	0.00	64	0.04	53	0.04	10	0.54	36	0.15
Uninsky 1932		36	0.66	23	0.01	35	0.04	30	0.20	43	0.16	32	0.18
Uninsky 1971		72	0.55	16	0.01	39	0.04	37	0.13	42	0.18	37	0.15
Wasowski 1980		28	0.69	31	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.10	61	0.05	62	0.07
Zak 1937		23	0.71	80	0.00	33	0.04	35	0.15	61	0.04	58	0.08
Zak 1951		26	0.70	78	0.00	34	0.04	36	0.15	51	0.05	53	0.09
Random 1		90	-0.25	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	44	0.08	88	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.04	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	63	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.11	75	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	40	0.14	81	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).