Fliere 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.87	6	0.06	3	0.15	4	0.49	5	0.52	10	0.50
Anderszewski 2003		14	0.81	9	0.02	26	0.11	25	0.27	3	0.48	26	0.36
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.71	79	0.00	23	0.07	24	0.28	10	0.46	27	0.36
Bacha 2000		69	0.60	62	0.00	61	0.05	52	0.05	25	0.20	66	0.10
Badura 1965		44	0.73	20	0.01	40	0.04	44	0.13	12	0.53	40	0.26
Barbosa 1983		77	0.53	84	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	36	0.12	76	0.07
Biret 1990		56	0.65	26	0.01	58	0.04	63	0.04	31	0.19	68	0.09
Blet 2003		26	0.78	64	0.00	36	0.05	28	0.22	1	0.53	28	0.34
Block 1995		66	0.62	30	0.01	20	0.09	37	0.16	3	0.44	37	0.27
Blumental 1952		67	0.61	27	0.01	56	0.04	67	0.04	65	0.04	85	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		10	0.82	15	0.02	17	0.10	13	0.41	6	0.57	14	0.48
Brailowsky 1960		54	0.69	11	0.02	48	0.05	55	0.05	11	0.43	47	0.15
Bunin 1987		73	0.55	87	0.00	69	0.04	75	0.04	22	0.40	59	0.13
Bunin 1987b		74	0.54	71	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	22	0.40	55	0.13
Chiu 1999		68	0.61	61	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.12	69	0.08
Cohen 1997		87	0.37	73	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	46	0.06	86	0.04
Cortot 1951		40	0.74	67	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	10	0.47	49	0.15
Csalog 1996		81	0.47	22	0.01	72	0.03	82	0.03	41	0.12	78	0.06
Czerny 1949		6	0.83	19	0.01	14	0.12	14	0.41	4	0.57	13	0.48
Czerny 1990		22	0.79	48	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.15	23	0.28	44	0.20
Duchoud 2007		70	0.60	43	0.00	55	0.05	50	0.05	6	0.48	48	0.15
Ezaki 2006		31	0.78	24	0.01	42	0.05	43	0.14	19	0.38	43	0.23
Falvay 1989		85	0.44	58	0.00	87	0.04	68	0.04	55	0.06	81	0.05
Farrell 1958		58	0.65	14	0.02	59	0.04	65	0.04	44	0.12	74	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.69	60	0.00	65	0.05	51	0.05	18	0.34	57	0.13
Fliere 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fou 1978		49	0.70	34	0.00	35	0.04	40	0.15	11	0.45	38	0.26
Francois 1956		62	0.63	72	0.00	74	0.05	58	0.05	39	0.12	73	0.08
Friedman 1923		28	0.78	65	0.00	32	0.05	35	0.19	20	0.45	35	0.29
Friedman 1923b		27	0.78	66	0.00	30	0.06	34	0.20	19	0.47	32	0.31
Friedman 1930		30	0.78	40	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.14	13	0.49	39	0.26
Garcia 2007		29	0.78	74	0.00	29	0.05	27	0.26	5	0.56	24	0.38
Garcia 2007b		38	0.74	54	0.00	31	0.07	26	0.27	7	0.54	25	0.38
Gierzod 1998		1	0.88	1	0.16	1	0.16	1	0.57	4	0.65	1	0.61
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.69	39	0.00	50	0.06	45	0.06	11	0.35	52	0.14
Groot 1988		65	0.62	25	0.01	60	0.05	56	0.05	16	0.40	53	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.79	49	0.00	22	0.09	18	0.38	10	0.44	21	0.41
Hatto 1993		18	0.80	8	0.03	8	0.11	9	0.46	5	0.58	7	0.52
Hatto 1997		12	0.81	3	0.10	7	0.11	8	0.46	6	0.56	9	0.51
Horowitz 1949		46	0.72	41	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	4	0.54	46	0.16
Indjic 1988		11	0.82	38	0.00	9	0.20	7	0.46	6	0.56	8	0.51
Kapell 1951		33	0.77	18	0.01	15	0.13	11	0.43	2	0.45	17	0.44
Kissin 1993		17	0.80	12	0.02	13	0.11	12	0.42	8	0.51	16	0.46
Kushner 1989		19	0.80	47	0.00	38	0.06	31	0.21	18	0.43	33	0.30
Luisada 1991		9	0.82	4	0.07	10	0.14	10	0.46	2	0.65	2	0.55
Lushtak 2004		41	0.74	51	0.00	41	0.05	36	0.18	12	0.34	42	0.25
Malcuzynski 1961		71	0.57	86	0.00	75	0.04	70	0.04	41	0.14	75	0.07
Magaloff 1978		61	0.63	17	0.01	62	0.04	62	0.04	21	0.30	60	0.11
Magin 1975		25	0.78	32	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.35	9	0.50	20	0.42
Michalowski 1933		48	0.71	52	0.00	54	0.05	48	0.05	17	0.42	51	0.14
Milkina 1970		43	0.73	68	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	25	0.32	62	0.11
Mohovich 1999		45	0.72	36	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	28	0.35	58	0.13
Moravec 1969		83	0.44	28	0.01	86	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	87	0.03
Morozova 2008		21	0.79	75	0.00	25	0.12	23	0.31	7	0.50	23	0.39
Neighaus 1950		7	0.83	21	0.01	12	0.14	16	0.41	8	0.55	15	0.47
Niedzielski 1931		32	0.77	88	0.00	44	0.08	39	0.15	12	0.49	36	0.27
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.81	10	0.02	11	0.14	15	0.41	6	0.57	12	0.48
Osinska 1989		8	0.82	16	0.01	19	0.11	17	0.39	5	0.60	11	0.48
Pachmann 1927		51	0.69	59	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	12	0.42	56	0.13
Paderewski 1930		57	0.65	80	0.00	66	0.03	79	0.03	27	0.27	67	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		39	0.74	46	0.00	28	0.05	30	0.21	5	0.48	29	0.32
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.47	90	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	51	0.06	83	0.04
Poblocka 1999		13	0.81	5	0.07	4	0.10	5	0.48	1	0.61	3	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.65	69	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	43	0.09	77	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.78	29	0.01	27	0.05	29	0.21	5	0.49	30	0.32
Rangell 2001		86	0.40	50	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	43	0.11	79	0.06
Richter 1976		50	0.70	42	0.00	53	0.06	46	0.06	6	0.60	45	0.19
Rosen 1989		34	0.77	45	0.00	37	0.05	33	0.20	11	0.47	31	0.31
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.63	76	0.00	71	0.04	77	0.04	17	0.30	64	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		75	0.54	78	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	28	0.23	70	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.54	55	0.00	83	0.04	76	0.04	33	0.17	72	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		72	0.56	70	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	20	0.32	65	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.53	81	0.00	84	0.04	64	0.04	35	0.17	71	0.08
Rossi 2007		80	0.48	37	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.04	88	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.65	85	0.00	64	0.05	47	0.05	25	0.25	61	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.44	31	0.01	77	0.04	78	0.04	46	0.10	80	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		55	0.68	53	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	28	0.31	63	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.85	23	0.01	5	0.12	6	0.47	2	0.63	4	0.54
Shebanova 2002		5	0.84	2	0.12	2	0.15	2	0.54	6	0.55	5	0.54
Smith 1975		35	0.75	13	0.02	47	0.04	60	0.04	3	0.51	50	0.14
Sokolov 2002		64	0.63	33	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.33	54	0.13
Sztompka 1959		4	0.84	7	0.03	6	0.15	3	0.53	5	0.53	6	0.53
Tomsic 1995		79	0.49	56	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	46	0.08	84	0.04
Uninsky 1932		37	0.74	57	0.00	34	0.04	32	0.20	17	0.44	34	0.30
Uninsky 1971		36	0.74	44	0.00	21	0.08	21	0.36	21	0.42	22	0.39
Wasowski 1980		42	0.73	35	0.00	33	0.05	38	0.15	8	0.43	41	0.25
Zak 1937		16	0.81	82	0.00	16	0.11	19	0.38	5	0.50	18	0.44
Zak 1951		23	0.79	63	0.00	18	0.12	20	0.37	4	0.50	19	0.43
Random 1		89	-0.23	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	80	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.11	83	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	34	0.14	82	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.25	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).