Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		32	0.41	60	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	73	0.04	56	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.39	15	0.01	62	0.05	52	0.05	72	0.03	54	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.47	11	0.01	52	0.04	58	0.04	83	0.03	74	0.03
Bacha 2000		2	0.67	16	0.01	8	0.13	2	0.51	31	0.15	8	0.28
Badura 1965		50	0.36	52	0.00	75	0.03	69	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03
Barbosa 1983		8	0.60	18	0.01	14	0.10	13	0.36	58	0.05	19	0.13
Biret 1990		9	0.58	83	0.00	20	0.06	17	0.35	87	0.03	28	0.10
Blet 2003		23	0.47	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.53	24	0.29	5	0.39
Block 1995		81	0.11	71	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.02	85	0.02
Blumental 1952		1	0.70	4	0.09	5	0.20	6	0.47	28	0.17	9	0.28
Boshniakovich 1969		73	0.21	42	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	85	0.02	86	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		27	0.45	72	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	86	0.02	60	0.03
Bunin 1987		79	0.12	21	0.01	84	0.03	71	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Bunin 1987b		82	0.11	33	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	78	0.03	78	0.02
Chiu 1999		5	0.65	13	0.01	19	0.07	31	0.26	74	0.03	31	0.09
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		62	0.29	62	0.00	68	0.03	72	0.03	87	0.02	90	0.02
Csalog 1996		43	0.38	43	0.00	6	0.12	8	0.45	21	0.32	6	0.38
Czerny 1949		72	0.22	31	0.00	79	0.04	64	0.04	83	0.03	71	0.03
Czerny 1990		25	0.46	20	0.01	22	0.06	22	0.30	77	0.03	35	0.09
Duchoud 2007		52	0.35	14	0.01	30	0.06	43	0.10	67	0.03	45	0.05
Ezaki 2006		22	0.47	87	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.04	47	0.04
Falvay 1989		13	0.55	3	0.14	3	0.16	7	0.46	26	0.43	3	0.44
Farrell 1958		10	0.57	75	0.00	24	0.07	20	0.31	69	0.04	23	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		26	0.45	24	0.01	15	0.07	21	0.31	59	0.05	20	0.12
Fliere 1977		46	0.37	44	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	84	0.03	48	0.04
Fou 1978		7	0.61	55	0.00	10	0.08	5	0.48	72	0.04	17	0.14
Francois 1956		30	0.42	58	0.00	39	0.06	34	0.22	80	0.03	39	0.08
Friedman 1923		53	0.35	84	0.00	82	0.04	67	0.04	87	0.02	77	0.03
Friedman 1923b		54	0.35	80	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02
Friedman 1930		56	0.33	86	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.02
Garcia 2007		28	0.44	28	0.00	21	0.06	30	0.26	81	0.03	34	0.09
Garcia 2007b		31	0.41	10	0.02	17	0.07	32	0.25	76	0.04	30	0.10
Gierzod 1998		58	0.31	59	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	72	0.03	72	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		64	0.29	63	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	64	0.04	46	0.05
Groot 1988		51	0.36	36	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	78	0.03	58	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		44	0.38	73	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03
Hatto 1993		16	0.55	51	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.27	73	0.04	29	0.10
Hatto 1997		15	0.55	76	0.00	27	0.07	28	0.27	80	0.04	26	0.10
Horowitz 1949		84	0.10	77	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.02
Indjic 1988		17	0.54	47	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.26	77	0.04	25	0.10
Kapell 1951		65	0.27	88	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.15	74	0.04	37	0.08
Kissin 1993		60	0.31	12	0.01	54	0.04	63	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.04
Kushner 1989		37	0.40	89	0.00	41	0.08	39	0.16	82	0.03	40	0.07
Luisada 1991		18	0.51	29	0.00	35	0.05	35	0.21	82	0.03	36	0.08
Lushtak 2004		3	0.66	38	0.00	9	0.13	10	0.43	49	0.06	15	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		88	-0.02	68	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02	79	0.02
Magaloff 1978		29	0.43	27	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.21	77	0.04	32	0.09
Magin 1975		77	0.17	81	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.03	65	0.03
Michalowski 1933		76	0.18	34	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.03
Milkina 1970		47	0.37	23	0.01	42	0.06	41	0.13	66	0.04	41	0.07
Mohovich 1999		20	0.50	53	0.00	23	0.06	18	0.34	83	0.04	21	0.12
Moravec 1969		34	0.40	6	0.03	29	0.05	14	0.35	42	0.13	11	0.21
Morozova 2008		41	0.38	54	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	88	0.02	69	0.03
Neighaus 1950		59	0.31	56	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	89	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.25	46	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	87	0.02	64	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.38	7	0.03	51	0.05	53	0.05	83	0.03	52	0.04
Osinska 1989		36	0.40	78	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	85	0.03	43	0.05
Pachmann 1927		63	0.29	48	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	86	0.02	66	0.03
Paderewski 1930		21	0.47	45	0.00	13	0.09	19	0.32	54	0.04	24	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		14	0.55	69	0.00	16	0.08	12	0.38	82	0.03	22	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		83	0.10	35	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.03	63	0.03
Poblocka 1999		78	0.15	79	0.00	61	0.04	56	0.04	81	0.03	61	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		19	0.51	64	0.00	11	0.08	11	0.39	54	0.05	16	0.14
Rachmaninoff 1923		48	0.37	61	0.00	65	0.03	68	0.03	76	0.03	62	0.03
Rangell 2001		85	0.06	30	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	81	0.03	75	0.03
Richter 1976		86	0.02	74	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.02
Rosen 1989		39	0.39	26	0.00	18	0.07	16	0.35	82	0.03	27	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.20	9	0.02	32	0.05	38	0.17	70	0.03	42	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.23	49	0.00	33	0.06	27	0.27	38	0.16	12	0.21
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.25	25	0.00	31	0.05	23	0.29	32	0.17	10	0.22
Rosenthal 1931c		66	0.26	17	0.01	12	0.08	15	0.35	24	0.28	7	0.31
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.24	90	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.24	33	0.17	13	0.20
Rossi 2007		12	0.57	22	0.01	26	0.07	24	0.29	44	0.10	14	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		4	0.65	5	0.04	4	0.18	4	0.49	8	0.43	2	0.46
Rubinstein 1952		11	0.57	2	0.18	2	0.19	3	0.50	11	0.50	1	0.50
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.62	8	0.03	7	0.13	9	0.44	23	0.36	4	0.40
Schilhawsky 1960		74	0.21	50	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.02	82	0.02
Shebanova 2002		57	0.33	66	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.04	55	0.04
Smith 1975		38	0.39	65	0.00	34	0.05	25	0.29	78	0.03	33	0.09
Sokolov 2002		45	0.37	19	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	82	0.03	44	0.05
Sztompka 1959		49	0.36	57	0.00	59	0.04	54	0.04	74	0.04	51	0.04
Tomsic 1995		61	0.30	37	0.00	36	0.05	37	0.17	44	0.10	18	0.13
Uninsky 1932		67	0.25	85	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.03
Uninsky 1971		80	0.11	39	0.00	69	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.03
Wasowski 1980		55	0.33	67	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.03
Zak 1937		33	0.41	82	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	77	0.03	49	0.04
Zak 1951		35	0.40	40	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	77	0.03	50	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.21	70	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	35	0.15	57	0.04
Random 2		87	0.01	41	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	64	0.03	84	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.11	32	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	20	0.36	38	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).