Bunin 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.55	33	0.00	23	0.14	23	0.35	70	0.04	27	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.42	34	0.00	32	0.05	39	0.19	79	0.03	43	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.55	20	0.00	18	0.11	14	0.46	56	0.04	19	0.14
Bacha 2000		68	0.31	35	0.00	67	0.05	59	0.05	87	0.03	56	0.04
Badura 1965		14	0.57	36	0.00	8	0.11	20	0.41	33	0.33	8	0.37
Barbosa 1983		77	0.25	37	0.00	71	0.04	69	0.04	80	0.03	76	0.03
Biret 1990		70	0.30	21	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	77	0.03	80	0.03
Blet 2003		61	0.36	38	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	87	0.02	78	0.03
Block 1995		52	0.42	9	0.00	53	0.06	56	0.06	74	0.03	66	0.04
Blumental 1952		66	0.32	14	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	79	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.61	39	0.00	17	0.15	8	0.50	41	0.18	9	0.30
Brailowsky 1960		69	0.30	40	0.00	70	0.05	57	0.05	84	0.03	59	0.04
Bunin 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987b		1	1.00	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Chiu 1999		58	0.38	41	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	75	0.03	60	0.04
Cohen 1997		86	0.12	6	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	71	0.03	89	0.02
Cortot 1951		25	0.52	42	0.00	24	0.10	24	0.33	52	0.05	26	0.13
Csalog 1996		62	0.35	7	0.00	58	0.06	54	0.06	81	0.03	64	0.04
Czerny 1949		6	0.64	22	0.00	5	0.15	5	0.54	36	0.31	6	0.41
Czerny 1990		60	0.36	43	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	52	0.04	69	0.04
Duchoud 2007		26	0.51	10	0.00	31	0.05	26	0.30	42	0.12	13	0.19
Ezaki 2006		50	0.42	44	0.00	50	0.06	55	0.06	69	0.03	55	0.04
Falvay 1989		80	0.20	45	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	73	0.03	86	0.02
Farrell 1958		76	0.25	46	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	75	0.04	62	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		23	0.52	47	0.00	38	0.06	34	0.23	54	0.05	30	0.11
Fliere 1977		19	0.55	15	0.00	22	0.16	22	0.40	75	0.04	22	0.13
Fou 1978		49	0.42	16	0.00	56	0.06	50	0.06	69	0.04	50	0.05
Francois 1956		55	0.39	48	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	73	0.04	71	0.04
Friedman 1923		41	0.46	49	0.00	33	0.07	28	0.29	46	0.07	21	0.14
Friedman 1923b		44	0.45	23	0.00	35	0.08	32	0.25	46	0.07	25	0.13
Friedman 1930		39	0.46	24	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.23	47	0.07	24	0.13
Garcia 2007		40	0.46	5	0.00	51	0.07	49	0.07	86	0.02	65	0.04
Garcia 2007b		32	0.50	8	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.14	67	0.04	45	0.07
Gierzod 1998		29	0.50	50	0.00	41	0.08	27	0.29	79	0.03	39	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.39	25	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.11	80	0.03	48	0.06
Groot 1988		36	0.46	26	0.00	26	0.06	43	0.13	54	0.06	40	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		15	0.56	51	0.00	9	0.10	11	0.49	34	0.15	12	0.27
Hatto 1993		43	0.45	52	0.00	30	0.05	35	0.23	75	0.04	35	0.10
Hatto 1997		37	0.46	53	0.00	28	0.05	30	0.25	63	0.05	29	0.11
Horowitz 1949		3	0.66	3	0.00	6	0.17	4	0.54	23	0.45	3	0.49
Indjic 1988		38	0.46	54	0.00	29	0.05	31	0.25	69	0.04	34	0.10
Kapell 1951		11	0.59	17	0.00	13	0.09	15	0.46	67	0.04	16	0.14
Kissin 1993		30	0.50	55	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.19	87	0.02	46	0.06
Kushner 1989		46	0.44	56	0.00	52	0.07	47	0.07	83	0.03	51	0.05
Luisada 1991		53	0.41	57	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	74	0.04	57	0.04
Lushtak 2004		31	0.50	58	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.30	66	0.04	32	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.44	59	0.00	27	0.05	41	0.18	55	0.04	41	0.08
Magaloff 1978		71	0.29	60	0.00	73	0.04	66	0.04	85	0.03	72	0.03
Magin 1975		24	0.52	11	0.00	19	0.09	18	0.45	55	0.05	15	0.15
Michalowski 1933		17	0.56	61	0.00	11	0.08	7	0.51	22	0.28	7	0.38
Milkina 1970		67	0.31	4	0.00	72	0.06	53	0.06	69	0.04	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		59	0.37	62	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	80	0.04	68	0.04
Moravec 1969		81	0.20	63	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	85	0.02
Morozova 2008		42	0.45	64	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	75	0.03	53	0.05
Neighaus 1950		12	0.58	65	0.00	14	0.08	12	0.48	72	0.04	20	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		47	0.43	27	0.00	49	0.06	52	0.06	65	0.04	49	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.52	66	0.00	20	0.13	16	0.45	68	0.04	23	0.13
Osinska 1989		57	0.38	67	0.00	63	0.04	72	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.04
Pachmann 1927		35	0.47	68	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	43	0.10	38	0.09
Paderewski 1930		51	0.42	69	0.00	55	0.05	63	0.05	83	0.03	63	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		27	0.51	70	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.22	71	0.04	37	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		74	0.27	71	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03
Poblocka 1999		10	0.59	72	0.00	7	0.12	13	0.47	39	0.16	10	0.27
Rabcewiczowa 1932		63	0.34	73	0.00	59	0.05	64	0.05	75	0.04	61	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.48	74	0.00	40	0.08	29	0.29	63	0.04	28	0.11
Rangell 2001		72	0.28	2	0.00	60	0.05	65	0.05	61	0.03	70	0.04
Richter 1976		2	0.68	75	0.00	2	0.27	3	0.57	10	0.55	2	0.56
Rosen 1989		65	0.33	76	0.00	69	0.05	62	0.05	73	0.04	67	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.41	77	0.00	48	0.07	48	0.07	60	0.04	54	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.17	28	0.00	86	0.02	81	0.02	76	0.04	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.18	78	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.23	29	0.00	77	0.03	75	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.15	12	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.04	81	0.03
Rossi 2007		88	0.05	18	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		75	0.26	13	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.04	75	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		79	0.22	79	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.04	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		82	0.19	30	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	82	0.03	88	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		5	0.64	80	0.00	3	0.24	2	0.58	32	0.37	4	0.46
Shebanova 2002		16	0.56	81	0.00	21	0.12	21	0.41	81	0.03	31	0.11
Smith 1975		64	0.34	82	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	64	0.04	73	0.03
Sokolov 2002		21	0.53	83	0.00	10	0.09	17	0.45	35	0.16	11	0.27
Sztompka 1959		33	0.48	84	0.00	42	0.07	33	0.24	77	0.03	42	0.08
Tomsic 1995		73	0.28	31	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	79	0.03	87	0.02
Uninsky 1932		13	0.57	32	0.00	12	0.09	19	0.43	48	0.07	14	0.17
Uninsky 1971		4	0.65	85	0.00	4	0.18	6	0.51	30	0.37	5	0.43
Wasowski 1980		28	0.51	19	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.22	78	0.04	36	0.09
Zak 1937		7	0.62	86	0.00	16	0.14	9	0.49	60	0.04	17	0.14
Zak 1951		8	0.62	87	0.00	15	0.11	10	0.49	60	0.04	18	0.14
Random 1		89	0.01	88	0.00	78	0.02	79	0.02	2	0.56	33	0.11
Random 2		90	-0.03	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	12	0.39	47	0.06
Random 3		87	0.06	90	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	6	0.54	44	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).