Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		15	0.72	28	0.00	27	0.10	15	0.37	40	0.20	30	0.27
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.67	24	0.01	25	0.08	26	0.26	24	0.26	32	0.26
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bacha 2000		35	0.67	70	0.00	47	0.04	55	0.04	18	0.30	47	0.11
Badura 1965		30	0.68	61	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.13	21	0.47	35	0.25
Barbosa 1983		57	0.57	48	0.00	67	0.03	80	0.03	52	0.05	73	0.04
Biret 1990		34	0.67	65	0.00	49	0.04	71	0.04	36	0.15	56	0.08
Blet 2003		73	0.48	75	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	67	0.04	75	0.04
Block 1995		71	0.49	76	0.00	60	0.05	50	0.05	36	0.13	55	0.08
Blumental 1952		24	0.69	19	0.01	45	0.04	58	0.04	53	0.05	78	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		41	0.65	49	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.18	30	0.31	36	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		54	0.59	67	0.00	62	0.06	48	0.06	33	0.21	48	0.11
Bunin 1987		60	0.55	25	0.00	57	0.04	56	0.04	14	0.46	43	0.14
Bunin 1987b		61	0.54	68	0.00	58	0.07	45	0.07	14	0.46	39	0.18
Chiu 1999		20	0.70	51	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.22	9	0.38	24	0.29
Cohen 1997		74	0.47	45	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	58	0.04	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		47	0.62	53	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.15	15	0.45	33	0.26
Csalog 1996		87	0.31	82	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.04	74	0.04
Czerny 1949		42	0.64	33	0.00	15	0.08	19	0.33	30	0.38	12	0.35
Czerny 1990		44	0.64	83	0.00	53	0.04	53	0.04	70	0.03	86	0.03
Duchoud 2007		14	0.73	4	0.12	4	0.11	17	0.33	3	0.55	8	0.43
Ezaki 2006		5	0.77	89	0.00	13	0.11	20	0.31	21	0.37	14	0.34
Falvay 1989		76	0.42	66	0.00	87	0.04	66	0.04	51	0.07	60	0.05
Farrell 1958		38	0.66	26	0.00	46	0.04	64	0.04	56	0.05	70	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.50	62	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04	77	0.04
Fliere 1977		19	0.71	41	0.00	12	0.10	10	0.46	24	0.28	11	0.36
Fou 1978		11	0.75	7	0.03	21	0.08	21	0.30	26	0.25	29	0.27
Francois 1956		67	0.52	59	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	48	0.05	79	0.04
Friedman 1923		18	0.71	27	0.00	29	0.08	25	0.27	25	0.42	17	0.34
Friedman 1923b		17	0.72	39	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.29	25	0.43	13	0.35
Friedman 1930		21	0.70	73	0.00	32	0.06	34	0.20	22	0.43	25	0.29
Garcia 2007		26	0.68	78	0.00	50	0.04	73	0.04	47	0.07	61	0.05
Garcia 2007b		33	0.67	71	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	32	0.25	41	0.17
Gierzod 1998		36	0.66	32	0.00	34	0.06	27	0.24	47	0.07	44	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		59	0.55	87	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	48	0.06	63	0.05
Groot 1988		49	0.61	36	0.00	22	0.07	37	0.15	37	0.22	40	0.18
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.73	47	0.00	10	0.08	8	0.47	17	0.38	10	0.42
Hatto 1993		8	0.76	60	0.00	19	0.12	16	0.36	27	0.28	20	0.32
Hatto 1997		7	0.76	18	0.01	17	0.08	14	0.38	27	0.30	16	0.34
Horowitz 1949		29	0.68	34	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.21	16	0.47	21	0.31
Indjic 1988		6	0.76	72	0.00	18	0.09	13	0.38	27	0.29	18	0.33
Kapell 1951		51	0.61	5	0.06	9	0.08	12	0.40	22	0.20	26	0.28
Kissin 1993		37	0.66	29	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.29	31	0.21	34	0.25
Kushner 1989		27	0.68	69	0.00	35	0.05	30	0.23	28	0.30	31	0.26
Luisada 1991		10	0.75	14	0.01	20	0.08	18	0.33	18	0.32	19	0.32
Lushtak 2004		22	0.69	20	0.01	42	0.05	42	0.10	33	0.17	45	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		78	0.41	31	0.00	73	0.04	62	0.04	52	0.05	72	0.04
Magaloff 1978		68	0.52	86	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	67	0.05	67	0.04
Magin 1975		12	0.75	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.62	3	0.56	1	0.59
Michalowski 1933		53	0.60	15	0.01	16	0.08	28	0.24	13	0.47	15	0.34
Milkina 1970		52	0.60	56	0.00	59	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.04
Mohovich 1999		40	0.66	63	0.00	48	0.04	74	0.04	49	0.07	62	0.05
Moravec 1969		80	0.39	50	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	63	0.04	80	0.03
Morozova 2008		2	0.78	3	0.12	2	0.23	3	0.54	4	0.55	3	0.54
Neighaus 1950		23	0.69	9	0.02	6	0.11	9	0.47	21	0.39	9	0.43
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.52	38	0.00	55	0.06	47	0.06	36	0.22	49	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.76	8	0.02	5	0.11	4	0.52	10	0.48	4	0.50
Osinska 1989		45	0.64	88	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	74	0.04	66	0.04
Pachmann 1927		75	0.45	84	0.00	77	0.04	65	0.04	68	0.03	84	0.03
Paderewski 1930		62	0.53	79	0.00	69	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.04	83	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.64	80	0.00	56	0.06	46	0.06	79	0.03	65	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		63	0.53	22	0.01	65	0.04	69	0.04	31	0.25	50	0.10
Poblocka 1999		65	0.52	11	0.01	30	0.07	24	0.28	30	0.27	27	0.27
Rabcewiczowa 1932		58	0.57	35	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		16	0.72	6	0.05	14	0.09	5	0.48	6	0.46	5	0.47
Rangell 2001		77	0.41	81	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	30	0.25	53	0.09
Richter 1976		69	0.52	16	0.01	54	0.04	54	0.04	34	0.36	46	0.12
Rosen 1989		46	0.64	37	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	39	0.11	51	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.39	64	0.00	74	0.04	57	0.04	40	0.10	58	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.38	30	0.00	78	0.04	68	0.04	40	0.15	54	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.38	57	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	42	0.10	64	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		86	0.33	43	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.37	52	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	56	0.05	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		72	0.49	54	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.04	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.57	42	0.00	66	0.03	75	0.03	47	0.06	68	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		79	0.41	46	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	72	0.04	89	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.61	77	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04	76	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		55	0.58	23	0.01	36	0.05	39	0.14	37	0.29	37	0.20
Shebanova 2002		31	0.67	21	0.01	11	0.09	11	0.43	35	0.23	22	0.31
Smith 1975		25	0.69	17	0.01	24	0.08	29	0.23	10	0.39	23	0.30
Sokolov 2002		28	0.68	12	0.01	23	0.08	32	0.21	14	0.35	28	0.27
Sztompka 1959		1	0.79	2	0.15	3	0.28	2	0.61	8	0.49	2	0.55
Tomsic 1995		81	0.39	55	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	71	0.04	82	0.03
Uninsky 1932		48	0.61	40	0.00	38	0.07	35	0.19	39	0.21	38	0.20
Uninsky 1971		66	0.52	44	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.09	41	0.22	42	0.14
Wasowski 1980		39	0.66	58	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	52	0.06	59	0.05
Zak 1937		3	0.78	10	0.02	7	0.10	6	0.48	12	0.38	6	0.43
Zak 1951		4	0.77	13	0.01	8	0.11	7	0.48	12	0.38	7	0.43
Random 1		90	-0.33	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.01	85	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	29	0.18	57	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.04	74	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	18	0.37	52	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).