Afanassiev 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.74	85	0.00	50	0.04	68	0.04	14	0.31	62	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.72	43	0.00	35	0.05	40	0.20	15	0.37	42	0.27
Bacha 2000		66	0.62	41	0.00	63	0.05	50	0.05	36	0.12	70	0.08
Badura 1965		30	0.77	28	0.00	34	0.05	39	0.23	10	0.54	35	0.35
Barbosa 1983		80	0.48	22	0.01	77	0.03	74	0.03	59	0.04	86	0.03
Biret 1990		51	0.70	30	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	25	0.24	65	0.10
Blet 2003		39	0.75	66	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.16	7	0.45	41	0.27
Block 1995		68	0.61	39	0.00	48	0.03	76	0.03	32	0.15	71	0.07
Blumental 1952		54	0.69	8	0.03	15	0.10	28	0.30	7	0.34	38	0.32
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.79	6	0.04	13	0.09	16	0.40	9	0.55	12	0.47
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.61	59	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.03	85	0.03
Bunin 1987		72	0.55	86	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	23	0.35	56	0.12
Bunin 1987b		73	0.54	87	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	23	0.35	53	0.12
Chiu 1999		58	0.66	36	0.00	62	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.18	66	0.09
Cohen 1997		86	0.41	69	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	55	0.04	82	0.04
Cortot 1951		53	0.69	62	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	28	0.28	57	0.12
Csalog 1996		83	0.48	60	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	66	0.03	88	0.03
Czerny 1949		6	0.84	34	0.00	6	0.19	4	0.53	2	0.61	4	0.57
Czerny 1990		8	0.83	12	0.02	12	0.10	22	0.39	3	0.54	16	0.46
Duchoud 2007		65	0.62	5	0.04	46	0.04	63	0.04	11	0.38	55	0.12
Ezaki 2006		14	0.80	26	0.01	28	0.07	30	0.29	7	0.54	24	0.40
Falvay 1989		78	0.50	55	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	62	0.05	79	0.04
Farrell 1958		47	0.71	18	0.01	47	0.04	66	0.04	28	0.30	60	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.67	21	0.01	61	0.05	55	0.05	13	0.38	49	0.14
Fliere 1977		2	0.87	13	0.01	5	0.16	5	0.52	4	0.49	11	0.50
Fou 1978		27	0.78	38	0.00	38	0.09	37	0.26	10	0.45	36	0.34
Francois 1956		49	0.71	58	0.00	52	0.04	72	0.04	10	0.48	50	0.14
Friedman 1923		22	0.79	70	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.26	10	0.53	32	0.37
Friedman 1923b		24	0.79	78	0.00	33	0.05	32	0.28	10	0.54	31	0.39
Friedman 1930		36	0.76	75	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.14	19	0.45	43	0.25
Garcia 2007		16	0.80	83	0.00	27	0.09	33	0.27	4	0.56	30	0.39
Garcia 2007b		38	0.75	88	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.27	12	0.49	34	0.36
Gierzod 1998		3	0.86	1	0.18	1	0.18	2	0.59	3	0.67	2	0.63
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.63	44	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	32	0.19	63	0.11
Groot 1988		60	0.65	53	0.00	64	0.05	51	0.05	32	0.25	64	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		10	0.82	7	0.03	14	0.12	11	0.45	8	0.49	13	0.47
Hatto 1993		28	0.78	20	0.01	23	0.08	21	0.39	14	0.45	22	0.42
Hatto 1997		25	0.79	67	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.38	15	0.41	29	0.39
Horowitz 1949		42	0.73	37	0.00	45	0.05	57	0.05	11	0.51	45	0.16
Indjic 1988		23	0.79	56	0.00	24	0.12	20	0.40	14	0.43	23	0.41
Kapell 1951		48	0.71	48	0.00	29	0.07	31	0.29	15	0.27	40	0.28
Kissin 1993		1	0.88	3	0.15	2	0.22	1	0.61	2	0.71	1	0.66
Kushner 1989		29	0.77	57	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.19	20	0.40	39	0.28
Luisada 1991		9	0.82	11	0.02	10	0.13	9	0.46	3	0.55	10	0.50
Lushtak 2004		41	0.74	79	0.00	51	0.04	62	0.04	25	0.22	69	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		69	0.61	16	0.01	49	0.04	69	0.04	13	0.33	61	0.11
Magaloff 1978		63	0.62	24	0.01	67	0.06	46	0.06	33	0.22	59	0.11
Magin 1975		26	0.78	23	0.01	9	0.14	8	0.46	1	0.59	6	0.52
Michalowski 1933		43	0.72	40	0.00	40	0.09	38	0.24	8	0.53	33	0.36
Milkina 1970		32	0.76	14	0.01	32	0.07	26	0.31	9	0.49	27	0.39
Mohovich 1999		44	0.72	51	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	23	0.43	44	0.22
Moravec 1969		76	0.52	52	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	46	0.07	74	0.05
Morozova 2008		18	0.80	46	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.33	9	0.47	28	0.39
Neighaus 1950		11	0.81	47	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.42	11	0.50	17	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		33	0.76	84	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.29	4	0.54	25	0.40
Ohlsson 1999		34	0.76	25	0.01	20	0.10	17	0.40	7	0.54	14	0.46
Osinska 1989		35	0.76	32	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.26	19	0.42	37	0.33
Pachmann 1927		56	0.68	76	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	5	0.47	48	0.15
Paderewski 1930		50	0.70	63	0.00	58	0.05	52	0.05	25	0.31	54	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		20	0.80	64	0.00	31	0.09	27	0.30	4	0.50	26	0.39
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.53	73	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	21	0.36	51	0.12
Poblocka 1999		13	0.81	4	0.11	4	0.17	6	0.52	3	0.60	5	0.56
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.70	35	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	18	0.30	52	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.80	9	0.03	19	0.10	13	0.43	1	0.60	8	0.51
Rangell 2001		87	0.41	68	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.05	83	0.04
Richter 1976		55	0.68	42	0.00	59	0.05	59	0.05	20	0.47	47	0.15
Rosen 1989		31	0.77	19	0.01	22	0.10	24	0.36	5	0.57	20	0.45
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.56	77	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	26	0.21	68	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.47	89	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	53	0.05	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.48	80	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	44	0.08	84	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.48	90	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	36	0.18	72	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.48	81	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	45	0.07	76	0.05
Rossi 2007		74	0.54	33	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	47	0.07	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		64	0.62	17	0.01	71	0.04	61	0.04	43	0.10	73	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		81	0.48	15	0.01	75	0.03	75	0.03	45	0.10	77	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		70	0.60	29	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	52	0.05	81	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		7	0.83	50	0.00	8	0.17	10	0.46	5	0.59	7	0.52
Shebanova 2002		4	0.85	2	0.15	3	0.19	3	0.57	3	0.63	3	0.60
Smith 1975		62	0.63	49	0.00	66	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.05	75	0.05
Sokolov 2002		59	0.65	45	0.00	55	0.06	45	0.06	11	0.38	46	0.15
Sztompka 1959		5	0.85	27	0.01	7	0.14	7	0.49	4	0.54	9	0.51
Tomsic 1995		77	0.51	54	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	47	0.08	80	0.04
Uninsky 1932		17	0.80	61	0.00	21	0.10	15	0.40	5	0.53	15	0.46
Uninsky 1971		37	0.76	10	0.02	11	0.11	12	0.44	10	0.47	19	0.45
Wasowski 1980		46	0.72	71	0.00	56	0.06	47	0.06	24	0.20	58	0.11
Zak 1937		12	0.81	31	0.00	18	0.09	18	0.40	7	0.49	21	0.44
Zak 1951		19	0.80	65	0.00	17	0.09	19	0.40	5	0.50	18	0.45
Random 1		90	-0.25	72	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	60	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.01	82	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	9	0.43	67	0.09
Random 3		89	-0.23	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).