Zak 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		15	0.66	23	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.44	22	0.45	19	0.44
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.60	6	0.00	48	0.07	49	0.07	34	0.30	56	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		18	0.65	37	0.00	23	0.10	29	0.32	12	0.46	29	0.38
Bacha 2000		75	0.47	54	0.00	74	0.05	66	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.05
Badura 1965		50	0.55	38	0.00	26	0.06	38	0.15	19	0.44	36	0.26
Barbosa 1983		49	0.55	4	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.13	19	0.47	37	0.25
Biret 1990		11	0.67	39	0.00	10	0.15	4	0.67	6	0.60	6	0.63
Blet 2003		60	0.52	40	0.00	64	0.04	78	0.04	29	0.22	70	0.09
Block 1995		56	0.54	41	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	16	0.43	51	0.15
Blumental 1952		35	0.61	11	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	42	0.13	68	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.65	55	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.60	5	0.62	7	0.61
Brailowsky 1960		74	0.47	9	0.00	78	0.05	65	0.05	71	0.04	79	0.04
Bunin 1987		65	0.50	56	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	14	0.46	57	0.14
Bunin 1987b		69	0.49	57	0.00	71	0.08	47	0.08	16	0.45	43	0.19
Chiu 1999		44	0.59	58	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	5	0.50	46	0.16
Cohen 1997		83	0.39	59	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	52	0.05	82	0.04
Cortot 1951		78	0.44	60	0.00	80	0.05	62	0.05	42	0.11	73	0.07
Csalog 1996		58	0.53	19	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	16	0.41	47	0.16
Czerny 1949		27	0.62	61	0.00	31	0.09	21	0.43	26	0.46	18	0.44
Czerny 1990		9	0.68	10	0.00	15	0.10	11	0.53	15	0.49	11	0.51
Duchoud 2007		71	0.48	42	0.00	73	0.05	64	0.05	25	0.27	65	0.12
Ezaki 2006		4	0.71	43	0.00	6	0.15	7	0.62	6	0.64	4	0.63
Falvay 1989		41	0.59	24	0.00	25	0.06	41	0.13	27	0.38	40	0.22
Farrell 1958		55	0.54	25	0.00	49	0.06	57	0.06	37	0.25	62	0.12
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.54	44	0.00	62	0.04	73	0.04	24	0.39	64	0.12
Fliere 1977		7	0.69	45	0.00	9	0.13	9	0.55	24	0.35	17	0.44
Fou 1978		20	0.64	46	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.23	26	0.32	34	0.27
Francois 1956		66	0.50	26	0.00	67	0.05	67	0.05	32	0.31	67	0.12
Friedman 1923		36	0.61	3	0.00	35	0.08	35	0.21	10	0.53	32	0.33
Friedman 1923b		34	0.61	12	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.35	10	0.56	21	0.44
Friedman 1930		28	0.62	15	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.39	7	0.62	13	0.49
Garcia 2007		76	0.47	62	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.04	86	0.03
Garcia 2007b		64	0.51	27	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	49	0.05	84	0.04
Gierzod 1998		3	0.71	17	0.00	3	0.14	6	0.63	21	0.52	8	0.57
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.54	63	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.18	30	0.29	39	0.23
Groot 1988		62	0.51	64	0.00	45	0.05	68	0.05	20	0.33	60	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.70	13	0.00	2	0.37	3	0.70	7	0.69	2	0.69
Hatto 1993		16	0.66	47	0.00	17	0.08	18	0.45	19	0.38	28	0.41
Hatto 1997		14	0.67	65	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.45	19	0.39	26	0.42
Horowitz 1949		68	0.49	66	0.00	69	0.04	81	0.04	38	0.26	69	0.10
Indjic 1988		13	0.67	20	0.00	19	0.15	17	0.45	20	0.39	25	0.42
Kapell 1951		23	0.63	18	0.00	13	0.09	16	0.45	17	0.40	23	0.42
Kissin 1993		2	0.72	67	0.00	5	0.17	5	0.65	9	0.63	3	0.64
Kushner 1989		10	0.68	68	0.00	20	0.11	12	0.53	24	0.52	10	0.52
Luisada 1991		21	0.64	21	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.18	30	0.29	38	0.23
Lushtak 2004		25	0.63	5	0.00	16	0.10	26	0.38	12	0.52	20	0.44
Malcuzynski 1961		70	0.48	69	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.14	35	0.15	54	0.14
Magaloff 1978		57	0.53	70	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.04
Magin 1975		19	0.65	48	0.00	21	0.09	13	0.52	19	0.45	14	0.48
Michalowski 1933		79	0.44	71	0.00	72	0.07	53	0.07	23	0.34	49	0.15
Milkina 1970		24	0.63	72	0.00	14	0.10	23	0.41	29	0.43	24	0.42
Mohovich 1999		42	0.59	73	0.00	50	0.07	51	0.07	36	0.31	52	0.15
Moravec 1969		80	0.42	28	0.00	83	0.04	72	0.04	52	0.05	78	0.04
Morozova 2008		39	0.60	29	0.00	47	0.06	56	0.06	31	0.30	59	0.13
Neighaus 1950		48	0.55	22	0.00	51	0.07	50	0.07	24	0.35	48	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.52	74	0.00	59	0.07	48	0.07	28	0.28	53	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.63	75	0.00	8	0.14	15	0.48	15	0.48	15	0.48
Osinska 1989		6	0.70	76	0.00	4	0.17	2	0.70	17	0.57	5	0.63
Pachmann 1927		72	0.47	49	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	8	0.50	63	0.12
Paderewski 1930		82	0.41	77	0.00	79	0.04	77	0.04	43	0.11	71	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		46	0.57	2	0.00	57	0.06	55	0.06	16	0.45	45	0.16
Pierdomenico 2008		67	0.49	50	0.00	63	0.04	75	0.04	17	0.43	58	0.13
Poblocka 1999		22	0.64	78	0.00	29	0.09	24	0.40	25	0.43	27	0.41
Rabcewiczowa 1932		61	0.52	79	0.00	60	0.08	46	0.08	64	0.04	76	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		45	0.58	80	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.14	26	0.28	42	0.20
Rangell 2001		73	0.47	30	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	22	0.39	66	0.12
Richter 1976		51	0.55	31	0.00	61	0.08	45	0.08	31	0.42	44	0.18
Rosen 1989		30	0.62	32	0.00	38	0.05	33	0.23	20	0.37	33	0.29
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.42	81	0.00	82	0.04	80	0.04	59	0.04	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.37	33	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	60	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.38	51	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	53	0.05	83	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.38	82	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.37	8	0.00	87	0.04	76	0.04	76	0.03	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		77	0.46	52	0.00	75	0.04	79	0.04	45	0.09	75	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.62	34	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.11	12	0.41	41	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		37	0.60	83	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.26	18	0.47	31	0.35
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.68	7	0.00	12	0.13	14	0.51	10	0.59	9	0.55
Schilhawsky 1960		31	0.62	84	0.00	33	0.08	30	0.28	23	0.44	30	0.35
Shebanova 2002		12	0.67	85	0.00	11	0.15	10	0.54	17	0.46	12	0.50
Smith 1975		43	0.59	86	0.00	53	0.05	61	0.05	28	0.27	61	0.12
Sokolov 2002		38	0.60	14	0.00	30	0.07	28	0.34	6	0.53	22	0.42
Sztompka 1959		33	0.61	16	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.26	36	0.26	35	0.26
Tomsic 1995		63	0.51	87	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	27	0.39	55	0.14
Uninsky 1932		52	0.54	53	0.00	52	0.06	58	0.06	28	0.39	50	0.15
Uninsky 1971		32	0.61	35	0.00	27	0.07	22	0.42	18	0.51	16	0.46
Wasowski 1980		47	0.57	88	0.00	58	0.07	52	0.07	52	0.06	74	0.06
Zak 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1951		1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Random 1		90	-0.08	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	52	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.03	36	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	49	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.06	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	27	0.23	72	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).