Wasowski 1980

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		29	0.59	62	0.00	39	0.07	34	0.26	42	0.13	42	0.18
Anderszewski 2003		9	0.63	10	0.01	17	0.12	12	0.51	16	0.49	9	0.50
Ashkenazy 1981		67	0.50	83	0.00	68	0.05	66	0.05	54	0.06	74	0.05
Bacha 2000		76	0.42	78	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.04	83	0.03
Badura 1965		54	0.54	54	0.00	55	0.06	57	0.06	43	0.17	57	0.10
Barbosa 1983		34	0.58	6	0.05	12	0.11	27	0.39	9	0.58	12	0.48
Biret 1990		24	0.60	27	0.00	13	0.10	18	0.45	24	0.35	18	0.40
Blet 2003		55	0.52	36	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	23	0.30	52	0.12
Block 1995		38	0.57	8	0.02	22	0.07	26	0.39	11	0.51	15	0.45
Blumental 1952		32	0.58	9	0.02	21	0.07	28	0.32	32	0.21	34	0.26
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.62	25	0.00	14	0.10	10	0.53	30	0.41	13	0.47
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.51	66	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	28	0.36	49	0.12
Bunin 1987		74	0.45	44	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	37	0.21	59	0.09
Bunin 1987b		75	0.44	57	0.00	75	0.03	86	0.03	37	0.23	61	0.08
Chiu 1999		45	0.56	58	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.18	10	0.40	31	0.27
Cohen 1997		83	0.36	45	0.00	81	0.05	63	0.05	59	0.04	80	0.04
Cortot 1951		57	0.52	34	0.00	62	0.04	79	0.04	17	0.49	48	0.14
Csalog 1996		79	0.42	51	0.00	63	0.04	77	0.04	59	0.05	78	0.04
Czerny 1949		23	0.60	38	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.29	40	0.23	33	0.26
Czerny 1990		8	0.64	28	0.00	19	0.10	21	0.43	36	0.22	30	0.31
Duchoud 2007		80	0.38	35	0.00	80	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.05	73	0.05
Ezaki 2006		33	0.58	74	0.00	54	0.07	50	0.07	59	0.05	64	0.06
Falvay 1989		66	0.50	13	0.01	74	0.03	85	0.03	54	0.06	75	0.04
Farrell 1958		64	0.50	63	0.00	64	0.04	75	0.04	51	0.07	70	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.56	69	0.00	49	0.08	46	0.08	11	0.52	40	0.20
Fliere 1977		6	0.65	4	0.06	4	0.15	9	0.54	29	0.25	21	0.37
Fou 1978		25	0.60	32	0.00	40	0.05	37	0.22	46	0.06	55	0.11
Francois 1956		69	0.47	84	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	56	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1923		51	0.55	18	0.01	53	0.06	53	0.06	26	0.40	46	0.15
Friedman 1923b		49	0.55	46	0.00	51	0.07	51	0.07	27	0.42	44	0.17
Friedman 1930		30	0.59	15	0.01	44	0.11	38	0.22	14	0.52	26	0.34
Garcia 2007		37	0.57	48	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.20	16	0.49	29	0.31
Garcia 2007b		17	0.62	12	0.01	10	0.10	11	0.53	7	0.56	5	0.54
Gierzod 1998		2	0.67	19	0.01	3	0.13	3	0.61	28	0.41	10	0.50
Gornostaeva 1994		15	0.62	21	0.00	15	0.09	8	0.56	9	0.57	3	0.56
Groot 1988		58	0.51	33	0.00	38	0.05	41	0.18	30	0.21	41	0.19
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.66	5	0.05	7	0.11	6	0.58	28	0.41	11	0.49
Hatto 1993		22	0.60	49	0.00	31	0.11	25	0.40	42	0.17	35	0.26
Hatto 1997		16	0.62	26	0.00	20	0.11	15	0.49	29	0.23	27	0.34
Horowitz 1949		53	0.54	81	0.00	58	0.06	58	0.06	16	0.49	43	0.17
Indjic 1988		20	0.61	59	0.00	25	0.08	19	0.45	37	0.22	28	0.31
Kapell 1951		7	0.64	7	0.02	5	0.15	4	0.61	13	0.43	8	0.51
Kissin 1993		11	0.63	22	0.00	16	0.09	13	0.51	39	0.30	19	0.39
Kushner 1989		19	0.62	52	0.00	24	0.07	17	0.45	32	0.31	22	0.37
Luisada 1991		5	0.66	56	0.00	11	0.11	14	0.50	6	0.56	6	0.53
Lushtak 2004		43	0.57	24	0.00	37	0.06	44	0.11	39	0.18	47	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.55	3	0.11	6	0.15	29	0.31	16	0.43	24	0.37
Magaloff 1978		59	0.51	31	0.00	59	0.06	55	0.06	43	0.10	60	0.08
Magin 1975		31	0.59	61	0.00	43	0.09	35	0.24	49	0.05	54	0.11
Michalowski 1933		78	0.42	60	0.00	78	0.05	61	0.05	58	0.05	71	0.05
Milkina 1970		18	0.62	11	0.01	18	0.11	20	0.43	36	0.31	23	0.37
Mohovich 1999		48	0.56	70	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	42	0.14	58	0.10
Moravec 1969		65	0.50	37	0.00	61	0.05	65	0.05	32	0.24	53	0.11
Morozova 2008		35	0.57	67	0.00	50	0.08	45	0.08	47	0.06	63	0.07
Neighaus 1950		36	0.57	68	0.00	28	0.07	31	0.30	20	0.40	25	0.35
Niedzielski 1931		52	0.54	50	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.18	23	0.36	36	0.25
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.56	43	0.00	33	0.08	30	0.30	38	0.14	39	0.20
Osinska 1989		1	0.69	2	0.23	2	0.25	1	0.68	18	0.53	1	0.60
Pachmann 1927		81	0.37	72	0.00	83	0.04	78	0.04	68	0.03	85	0.03
Paderewski 1930		70	0.47	85	0.00	60	0.05	64	0.05	16	0.46	45	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		12	0.63	29	0.00	30	0.09	23	0.43	3	0.61	7	0.51
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.42	79	0.00	73	0.03	87	0.03	57	0.05	76	0.04
Poblocka 1999		26	0.59	20	0.00	23	0.07	16	0.47	26	0.42	16	0.44
Rabcewiczowa 1932		46	0.56	16	0.01	27	0.07	36	0.23	24	0.29	32	0.26
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.52	55	0.00	56	0.05	62	0.05	60	0.05	69	0.05
Rangell 2001		61	0.50	39	0.00	34	0.06	43	0.13	10	0.50	38	0.25
Richter 1976		62	0.50	75	0.00	66	0.04	80	0.04	37	0.30	56	0.11
Rosen 1989		28	0.59	42	0.00	29	0.07	22	0.43	25	0.33	20	0.38
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.36	73	0.00	82	0.04	69	0.04	49	0.04	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.31	53	0.00	85	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.28	88	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.31	89	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.26	71	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		68	0.49	76	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	21	0.36	50	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		63	0.50	82	0.00	69	0.05	67	0.05	70	0.04	77	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.46	40	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	53	0.05	81	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.57	41	0.00	52	0.06	56	0.06	60	0.05	72	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.59	23	0.00	41	0.06	33	0.26	35	0.24	37	0.25
Shebanova 2002		10	0.63	14	0.01	9	0.09	5	0.58	29	0.30	17	0.42
Smith 1975		39	0.57	64	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	35	0.21	51	0.12
Sokolov 2002		73	0.46	80	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	69	0.03	84	0.03
Sztompka 1959		3	0.67	1	0.28	1	0.28	2	0.65	16	0.54	2	0.59
Tomsic 1995		71	0.46	17	0.01	79	0.06	54	0.06	51	0.07	67	0.06
Uninsky 1932		21	0.60	90	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.42	17	0.48	14	0.45
Uninsky 1971		13	0.62	30	0.00	8	0.12	7	0.56	17	0.53	4	0.54
Wasowski 1980		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1937		40	0.57	86	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	52	0.07	65	0.06
Zak 1951		42	0.57	87	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	56	0.06	66	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.08	47	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	34	0.16	68	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.15	65	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.05	77	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	8	0.36	62	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).