Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.68	30	0.00	11	0.16	15	0.58	11	0.54	14	0.56
Anderszewski 2003		50	0.51	74	0.00	51	0.06	55	0.06	59	0.04	69	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.49	49	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	35	0.21	49	0.12
Bacha 2000		79	0.39	33	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	44	0.10	55	0.07
Badura 1965		22	0.59	51	0.00	17	0.14	24	0.47	8	0.58	17	0.52
Barbosa 1983		68	0.43	11	0.01	57	0.06	54	0.06	39	0.15	52	0.09
Biret 1990		57	0.48	25	0.00	50	0.08	46	0.08	73	0.04	61	0.06
Blet 2003		36	0.55	81	0.00	53	0.07	50	0.07	15	0.39	41	0.17
Block 1995		46	0.52	37	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.13	33	0.20	43	0.16
Blumental 1952		58	0.48	36	0.00	35	0.05	40	0.17	37	0.16	44	0.16
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.68	2	0.05	8	0.14	9	0.61	10	0.58	8	0.59
Brailowsky 1960		73	0.42	44	0.00	75	0.05	71	0.05	58	0.05	63	0.05
Bunin 1987		42	0.54	62	0.00	37	0.08	42	0.16	11	0.49	35	0.28
Bunin 1987b		44	0.53	71	0.00	36	0.05	41	0.16	7	0.50	33	0.28
Chiu 1999		66	0.44	21	0.00	61	0.05	69	0.05	41	0.12	54	0.08
Cohen 1997		87	0.24	45	0.00	79	0.03	86	0.03	53	0.05	77	0.04
Cortot 1951		37	0.55	84	0.00	49	0.07	47	0.07	5	0.63	39	0.21
Csalog 1996		63	0.44	38	0.00	67	0.05	72	0.05	57	0.05	68	0.05
Czerny 1949		7	0.68	7	0.02	6	0.13	6	0.63	12	0.57	7	0.60
Czerny 1990		17	0.61	4	0.04	21	0.10	23	0.48	32	0.33	29	0.40
Duchoud 2007		78	0.40	50	0.00	69	0.04	77	0.04	44	0.11	56	0.07
Ezaki 2006		35	0.55	67	0.00	46	0.06	53	0.06	63	0.04	62	0.05
Falvay 1989		81	0.35	52	0.00	83	0.04	81	0.04	84	0.03	83	0.03
Farrell 1958		77	0.40	43	0.00	64	0.04	79	0.04	62	0.06	66	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		24	0.59	47	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.26	7	0.55	30	0.38
Fliere 1977		5	0.69	19	0.00	9	0.15	11	0.61	14	0.48	16	0.54
Fou 1978		41	0.54	54	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.26	34	0.22	37	0.24
Francois 1956		60	0.46	42	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	49	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1923		40	0.54	85	0.00	30	0.11	29	0.34	8	0.54	25	0.43
Friedman 1923b		39	0.54	55	0.00	29	0.13	28	0.40	9	0.57	22	0.48
Friedman 1930		48	0.52	68	0.00	44	0.08	43	0.16	20	0.48	34	0.28
Garcia 2007		53	0.49	72	0.00	58	0.07	49	0.07	37	0.25	47	0.13
Garcia 2007b		29	0.58	48	0.00	26	0.13	25	0.47	14	0.51	21	0.49
Gierzod 1998		6	0.69	5	0.02	7	0.13	8	0.62	19	0.54	9	0.58
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.49	53	0.00	66	0.05	68	0.05	69	0.03	78	0.04
Groot 1988		61	0.45	29	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	77	0.04	79	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.66	12	0.01	13	0.20	2	0.68	10	0.63	3	0.65
Hatto 1993		30	0.58	9	0.02	4	0.15	13	0.60	6	0.55	13	0.57
Hatto 1997		23	0.59	57	0.00	5	0.13	14	0.59	7	0.55	12	0.57
Horowitz 1949		31	0.58	63	0.00	42	0.08	32	0.29	6	0.55	28	0.40
Indjic 1988		21	0.59	3	0.04	3	0.15	12	0.60	7	0.55	11	0.57
Kapell 1951		14	0.65	32	0.00	20	0.10	20	0.49	20	0.36	26	0.42
Kissin 1993		8	0.68	20	0.00	15	0.20	4	0.64	10	0.62	4	0.63
Kushner 1989		38	0.55	56	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	49	0.07	59	0.06
Luisada 1991		34	0.56	35	0.00	43	0.10	35	0.24	38	0.17	40	0.20
Lushtak 2004		59	0.46	40	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	67	0.04	71	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		43	0.54	15	0.01	18	0.11	39	0.19	21	0.33	36	0.25
Magaloff 1978		67	0.43	28	0.00	72	0.05	67	0.05	57	0.04	73	0.04
Magin 1975		18	0.61	39	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.20	45	0.06	50	0.11
Michalowski 1933		33	0.57	34	0.00	23	0.11	26	0.44	7	0.59	18	0.51
Milkina 1970		19	0.60	10	0.01	28	0.12	27	0.42	38	0.24	32	0.32
Mohovich 1999		49	0.51	18	0.01	55	0.05	59	0.05	47	0.08	60	0.06
Moravec 1969		62	0.45	26	0.00	74	0.05	58	0.05	42	0.13	53	0.08
Morozova 2008		32	0.57	69	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.20	36	0.24	38	0.22
Neighaus 1950		25	0.59	70	0.00	24	0.12	19	0.50	17	0.49	20	0.49
Niedzielski 1931		27	0.58	61	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.29	14	0.46	31	0.37
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.53	22	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.49	20	0.45	23	0.47
Osinska 1989		26	0.58	64	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.32	53	0.07	45	0.15
Pachmann 1927		76	0.40	83	0.00	81	0.04	82	0.04	75	0.03	85	0.03
Paderewski 1930		70	0.42	65	0.00	63	0.04	78	0.04	30	0.27	51	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.52	60	0.00	48	0.06	57	0.06	25	0.32	46	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.36	89	0.00	80	0.04	80	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.04
Poblocka 1999		2	0.73	17	0.01	12	0.23	10	0.61	11	0.54	10	0.57
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.50	58	0.00	56	0.05	61	0.05	50	0.05	65	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.49	31	0.00	54	0.08	45	0.08	53	0.05	58	0.06
Rangell 2001		75	0.41	78	0.00	76	0.05	64	0.05	47	0.06	72	0.05
Richter 1976		4	0.70	6	0.02	14	0.20	3	0.64	2	0.68	2	0.66
Rosen 1989		28	0.58	59	0.00	41	0.07	36	0.21	42	0.13	42	0.17
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.42	75	0.00	78	0.04	75	0.04	54	0.04	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.29	41	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.28	90	0.00	86	0.04	83	0.04	84	0.02	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.34	79	0.00	84	0.05	62	0.05	75	0.03	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.26	86	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.03
Rossi 2007		83	0.31	77	0.00	82	0.05	70	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		65	0.44	24	0.00	71	0.04	76	0.04	84	0.03	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		74	0.41	27	0.00	73	0.05	65	0.05	65	0.04	81	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		71	0.42	87	0.00	70	0.06	56	0.06	63	0.05	70	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.71	8	0.02	2	0.25	7	0.62	10	0.59	6	0.60
Shebanova 2002		13	0.65	46	0.00	16	0.19	16	0.56	19	0.45	19	0.50
Smith 1975		52	0.50	13	0.01	65	0.04	73	0.04	51	0.05	74	0.04
Sokolov 2002		64	0.44	23	0.00	47	0.05	66	0.05	28	0.27	48	0.12
Sztompka 1959		12	0.66	14	0.01	10	0.13	5	0.63	13	0.57	5	0.60
Tomsic 1995		72	0.42	88	0.00	77	0.04	84	0.04	54	0.07	67	0.05
Uninsky 1932		1	0.81	1	0.62	1	0.62	1	0.83	1	0.85	1	0.84
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		15	0.62	16	0.01	19	0.10	17	0.53	7	0.56	15	0.54
Zak 1937		16	0.61	76	0.00	25	0.14	18	0.51	22	0.42	24	0.46
Zak 1951		20	0.60	66	0.00	27	0.16	22	0.48	25	0.36	27	0.42
Random 1		88	-0.04	80	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	23	0.27	57	0.07
Random 2		89	-0.08	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	37	0.11	87	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.09	82	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	51	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).