Uninsky 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.65	77	0.00	10	0.10	12	0.52	28	0.39	16	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.52	36	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	63	0.04	57	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.53	26	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.33	33	0.24	27	0.28
Bacha 2000		69	0.43	74	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.04
Badura 1965		29	0.55	16	0.00	15	0.10	37	0.30	20	0.42	21	0.35
Barbosa 1983		63	0.45	13	0.01	52	0.06	51	0.06	48	0.06	53	0.06
Biret 1990		42	0.52	28	0.00	36	0.09	34	0.34	68	0.04	47	0.12
Blet 2003		49	0.50	52	0.00	62	0.03	80	0.03	46	0.07	58	0.05
Block 1995		53	0.49	49	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.05	71	0.04
Blumental 1952		48	0.50	39	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	83	0.03	72	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		13	0.61	46	0.00	12	0.11	9	0.55	27	0.44	10	0.49
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.45	31	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	59	0.05	61	0.04
Bunin 1987		61	0.46	44	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	25	0.39	46	0.12
Bunin 1987b		65	0.45	59	0.00	56	0.06	50	0.06	25	0.39	39	0.15
Chiu 1999		62	0.46	78	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	64	0.04	63	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.29	70	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	48	0.05	74	0.04
Cortot 1951		32	0.54	29	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	16	0.49	44	0.14
Csalog 1996		77	0.39	53	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04
Czerny 1949		6	0.65	7	0.01	5	0.23	5	0.59	16	0.54	7	0.56
Czerny 1990		24	0.58	38	0.00	25	0.08	18	0.47	46	0.08	35	0.19
Duchoud 2007		80	0.38	51	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.05	69	0.04
Ezaki 2006		17	0.59	37	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.43	32	0.30	19	0.36
Falvay 1989		83	0.35	80	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.03	89	0.02
Farrell 1958		72	0.41	75	0.00	71	0.04	63	0.04	73	0.04	66	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		39	0.52	63	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	29	0.34	43	0.14
Fliere 1977		9	0.64	45	0.00	9	0.15	8	0.55	38	0.18	24	0.31
Fou 1978		19	0.59	33	0.00	23	0.07	26	0.42	37	0.18	30	0.27
Francois 1956		71	0.42	56	0.00	70	0.04	77	0.04	73	0.04	80	0.04
Friedman 1923		34	0.53	84	0.00	44	0.09	43	0.18	28	0.37	32	0.26
Friedman 1923b		33	0.54	85	0.00	39	0.09	35	0.33	25	0.42	18	0.37
Friedman 1930		51	0.50	89	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	34	0.30	45	0.13
Garcia 2007		55	0.48	90	0.00	59	0.04	76	0.04	53	0.05	70	0.04
Garcia 2007b		30	0.54	71	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.34	26	0.35	22	0.34
Gierzod 1998		14	0.61	4	0.02	7	0.19	7	0.57	30	0.38	13	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.51	18	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	70	0.03	75	0.04
Groot 1988		76	0.39	54	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.04	78	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		2	0.66	6	0.01	2	0.17	2	0.68	16	0.58	2	0.63
Hatto 1993		52	0.50	81	0.00	18	0.10	20	0.46	41	0.18	25	0.29
Hatto 1997		44	0.51	24	0.00	28	0.07	24	0.45	38	0.16	31	0.27
Horowitz 1949		25	0.58	30	0.00	35	0.08	38	0.28	12	0.51	17	0.38
Indjic 1988		45	0.51	86	0.00	29	0.13	23	0.45	41	0.17	26	0.28
Kapell 1951		18	0.59	67	0.00	19	0.10	21	0.46	32	0.24	23	0.33
Kissin 1993		4	0.66	21	0.00	6	0.18	4	0.60	17	0.58	3	0.59
Kushner 1989		43	0.52	72	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.05	56	0.05
Luisada 1991		21	0.58	32	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.35	52	0.06	41	0.14
Lushtak 2004		66	0.44	47	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	78	0.03	86	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.57	2	0.07	3	0.14	16	0.48	11	0.48	11	0.48
Magaloff 1978		59	0.46	19	0.00	58	0.05	54	0.05	74	0.04	64	0.04
Magin 1975		12	0.62	25	0.00	22	0.07	19	0.47	35	0.27	20	0.36
Michalowski 1933		20	0.58	17	0.00	14	0.12	13	0.51	5	0.60	8	0.55
Milkina 1970		22	0.58	22	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.42	62	0.05	42	0.14
Mohovich 1999		56	0.47	68	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	74	0.04	73	0.04
Moravec 1969		35	0.53	3	0.05	21	0.09	44	0.16	18	0.46	28	0.27
Morozova 2008		11	0.62	5	0.02	17	0.12	15	0.49	16	0.44	14	0.46
Neighaus 1950		38	0.53	82	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.21	36	0.16	36	0.18
Niedzielski 1931		15	0.61	42	0.00	11	0.11	14	0.49	3	0.53	9	0.51
Ohlsson 1999		58	0.47	43	0.00	40	0.09	39	0.25	57	0.05	48	0.11
Osinska 1989		41	0.52	57	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.19	68	0.04	50	0.09
Pachmann 1927		81	0.38	76	0.00	87	0.04	74	0.04	65	0.03	84	0.03
Paderewski 1930		75	0.40	87	0.00	75	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.03	83	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.50	41	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		86	0.31	64	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.04	81	0.03
Poblocka 1999		8	0.65	15	0.00	13	0.12	11	0.54	29	0.41	12	0.47
Rabcewiczowa 1932		26	0.57	10	0.01	30	0.07	31	0.36	33	0.21	29	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.56	20	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.38	46	0.07	37	0.16
Rangell 2001		74	0.40	61	0.00	72	0.04	78	0.04	57	0.05	76	0.04
Richter 1976		10	0.64	12	0.01	16	0.12	10	0.54	10	0.58	6	0.56
Rosen 1989		47	0.50	79	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	66	0.05	59	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.43	65	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.38	58	0.00	79	0.04	72	0.04	44	0.13	51	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.36	66	0.00	81	0.04	75	0.04	43	0.12	52	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.38	34	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	59	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.34	55	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	54	0.05	77	0.04
Rossi 2007		73	0.40	48	0.00	76	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.04	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.47	9	0.01	63	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		67	0.43	23	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	68	0.04	79	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		70	0.42	27	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	71	0.05	68	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.66	14	0.01	4	0.17	6	0.59	14	0.55	5	0.57
Shebanova 2002		23	0.58	83	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.46	42	0.13	33	0.24
Smith 1975		54	0.48	11	0.01	61	0.05	56	0.05	62	0.04	65	0.04
Sokolov 2002		60	0.46	35	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.22	31	0.24	34	0.23
Sztompka 1959		5	0.66	8	0.01	8	0.21	3	0.61	17	0.53	4	0.57
Tomsic 1995		85	0.33	73	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	70	0.05	82	0.03
Uninsky 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1971		1	0.81	1	0.69	1	0.68	1	0.85	1	0.83	1	0.84
Wasowski 1980		16	0.60	62	0.00	20	0.10	17	0.48	24	0.42	15	0.45
Zak 1937		31	0.54	88	0.00	37	0.09	28	0.39	58	0.06	38	0.15
Zak 1951		36	0.53	69	0.00	38	0.09	30	0.37	55	0.06	40	0.15
Random 1		90	-0.08	50	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	54	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.01	40	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	6	0.49	49	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.08	60	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	43	0.10	87	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).