Tomsic 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.43	33	0.00	56	0.08	49	0.08	86	0.02	74	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.49	24	0.00	26	0.09	20	0.47	58	0.04	29	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.38	51	0.00	61	0.06	59	0.06	81	0.03	75	0.04
Bacha 2000		55	0.40	40	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.14	79	0.03	46	0.06
Badura 1965		60	0.39	72	0.00	54	0.07	55	0.07	61	0.05	51	0.06
Barbosa 1983		44	0.43	61	0.00	23	0.07	32	0.34	38	0.18	15	0.25
Biret 1990		32	0.47	73	0.00	27	0.09	25	0.43	58	0.04	33	0.13
Blet 2003		38	0.45	39	0.00	47	0.07	52	0.07	61	0.05	50	0.06
Block 1995		16	0.52	7	0.02	17	0.09	11	0.55	27	0.25	8	0.37
Blumental 1952		56	0.40	42	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.17	76	0.04	40	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		19	0.51	49	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.33	61	0.05	32	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.39	18	0.01	65	0.05	65	0.05	75	0.04	63	0.04
Bunin 1987		74	0.32	64	0.00	77	0.05	69	0.05	63	0.04	76	0.04
Bunin 1987b		73	0.32	59	0.00	76	0.06	61	0.06	82	0.03	67	0.04
Chiu 1999		52	0.42	25	0.00	46	0.08	50	0.08	53	0.05	48	0.06
Cohen 1997		70	0.34	35	0.00	55	0.07	53	0.07	44	0.10	42	0.08
Cortot 1951		80	0.28	37	0.00	68	0.05	76	0.05	84	0.03	77	0.04
Csalog 1996		9	0.55	32	0.00	6	0.13	9	0.59	9	0.50	3	0.54
Czerny 1949		64	0.38	87	0.00	70	0.06	60	0.06	82	0.03	73	0.04
Czerny 1990		28	0.48	38	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.13	70	0.04	45	0.07
Duchoud 2007		59	0.39	58	0.00	52	0.06	62	0.06	53	0.05	60	0.05
Ezaki 2006		15	0.53	41	0.00	24	0.08	18	0.48	50	0.06	19	0.17
Falvay 1989		2	0.62	5	0.03	3	0.22	2	0.68	9	0.53	2	0.60
Farrell 1958		29	0.48	46	0.00	21	0.10	24	0.46	65	0.05	21	0.15
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.39	62	0.00	66	0.05	68	0.05	63	0.04	72	0.04
Fliere 1977		26	0.49	66	0.00	33	0.12	33	0.33	82	0.03	35	0.10
Fou 1978		17	0.52	23	0.00	15	0.08	14	0.52	64	0.04	24	0.14
Francois 1956		57	0.40	74	0.00	57	0.09	45	0.09	68	0.04	53	0.06
Friedman 1923		86	0.24	80	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.04	86	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.24	88	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1930		84	0.25	89	0.00	87	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.04	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		41	0.44	36	0.00	32	0.12	28	0.36	60	0.05	31	0.13
Garcia 2007b		48	0.43	54	0.00	51	0.05	67	0.05	55	0.04	78	0.04
Gierzod 1998		11	0.54	17	0.01	14	0.08	17	0.50	68	0.04	30	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		31	0.47	55	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.14	85	0.03	52	0.06
Groot 1988		13	0.54	27	0.00	11	0.15	15	0.52	29	0.23	9	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.50	22	0.00	28	0.10	23	0.46	78	0.03	34	0.12
Hatto 1993		67	0.37	65	0.00	60	0.06	58	0.06	75	0.04	62	0.05
Hatto 1997		63	0.38	48	0.00	58	0.08	47	0.08	87	0.03	59	0.05
Horowitz 1949		68	0.36	63	0.00	71	0.04	77	0.04	72	0.04	68	0.04
Indjic 1988		65	0.38	43	0.00	59	0.08	48	0.08	86	0.03	58	0.05
Kapell 1951		10	0.55	14	0.01	18	0.10	16	0.51	60	0.04	25	0.14
Kissin 1993		12	0.54	28	0.00	16	0.09	12	0.55	59	0.05	20	0.17
Kushner 1989		6	0.57	19	0.00	8	0.20	8	0.59	46	0.09	17	0.23
Luisada 1991		43	0.43	77	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.15	66	0.05	36	0.09
Lushtak 2004		18	0.52	16	0.01	12	0.12	13	0.54	41	0.13	14	0.26
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.43	47	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.11	83	0.03	49	0.06
Magaloff 1978		33	0.47	53	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.18	56	0.04	38	0.08
Magin 1975		40	0.44	50	0.00	48	0.05	63	0.05	66	0.04	66	0.04
Michalowski 1933		87	0.23	78	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03
Milkina 1970		3	0.59	2	0.08	2	0.32	4	0.65	35	0.32	5	0.46
Mohovich 1999		1	0.64	1	0.55	1	0.54	1	0.74	15	0.59	1	0.66
Moravec 1969		54	0.41	44	0.00	64	0.08	46	0.08	76	0.03	54	0.05
Morozova 2008		23	0.49	4	0.04	10	0.14	10	0.56	44	0.10	16	0.24
Neighaus 1950		66	0.37	69	0.00	69	0.05	73	0.05	61	0.05	61	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.34	31	0.00	75	0.05	72	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.49	21	0.00	31	0.15	21	0.46	56	0.05	22	0.15
Osinska 1989		4	0.58	26	0.00	7	0.19	7	0.60	55	0.07	18	0.20
Pachmann 1927		39	0.44	20	0.00	49	0.05	66	0.05	20	0.39	28	0.14
Paderewski 1930		75	0.31	90	0.00	72	0.05	75	0.05	68	0.03	70	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		35	0.46	45	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	70	0.04	43	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		30	0.48	13	0.01	20	0.08	29	0.36	29	0.32	10	0.34
Poblocka 1999		37	0.45	29	0.00	50	0.05	64	0.05	74	0.04	64	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		49	0.42	81	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.21	81	0.03	39	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		78	0.29	82	0.00	74	0.05	71	0.05	74	0.04	65	0.04
Rangell 2001		36	0.45	52	0.00	13	0.11	31	0.34	32	0.29	12	0.31
Richter 1976		69	0.36	8	0.02	67	0.05	74	0.05	64	0.04	69	0.04
Rosen 1989		5	0.57	9	0.01	5	0.27	5	0.63	30	0.28	7	0.42
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.26	75	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.30	60	0.00	78	0.04	78	0.04	84	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.28	57	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.30	83	0.00	79	0.04	79	0.04	84	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.26	84	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Rossi 2007		42	0.44	6	0.03	22	0.10	30	0.35	28	0.32	11	0.33
Rubinstein 1939		25	0.49	34	0.00	30	0.13	19	0.48	40	0.15	13	0.27
Rubinstein 1952		8	0.56	11	0.01	9	0.21	6	0.61	29	0.35	6	0.46
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.57	3	0.05	4	0.20	3	0.65	27	0.38	4	0.50
Schilhawsky 1960		79	0.28	79	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.04	81	0.03
Shebanova 2002		14	0.53	30	0.00	25	0.11	22	0.46	51	0.05	23	0.15
Smith 1975		53	0.42	76	0.00	62	0.06	57	0.06	58	0.05	55	0.05
Sokolov 2002		47	0.43	15	0.01	35	0.09	35	0.28	79	0.03	37	0.09
Sztompka 1959		50	0.42	70	0.00	53	0.06	56	0.06	85	0.03	71	0.04
Tomsic 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1932		72	0.33	67	0.00	73	0.05	70	0.05	86	0.02	83	0.03
Uninsky 1971		51	0.42	68	0.00	63	0.07	54	0.07	84	0.04	57	0.05
Wasowski 1980		34	0.46	12	0.01	45	0.07	51	0.07	54	0.06	47	0.06
Zak 1937		20	0.51	85	0.00	29	0.12	27	0.39	59	0.05	26	0.14
Zak 1951		21	0.50	10	0.01	19	0.08	26	0.40	61	0.05	27	0.14
Random 1		89	-0.04	56	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	20	0.30	41	0.08
Random 2		90	-0.09	71	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.03	87	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.04	86	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	26	0.23	44	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).