Sztompka 1959

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.70	11	0.02	9	0.13	14	0.57	10	0.57	17	0.57
Anderszewski 2003		25	0.64	40	0.00	29	0.14	28	0.48	13	0.51	25	0.49
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.68	9	0.03	13	0.12	9	0.60	2	0.66	7	0.63
Bacha 2000		64	0.52	64	0.00	68	0.05	64	0.05	24	0.31	59	0.12
Badura 1965		56	0.56	47	0.00	61	0.07	47	0.07	26	0.37	51	0.16
Barbosa 1983		72	0.48	88	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	43	0.12	72	0.07
Biret 1990		35	0.61	48	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.37	13	0.46	35	0.41
Blet 2003		65	0.51	49	0.00	70	0.06	55	0.06	25	0.30	57	0.13
Block 1995		61	0.54	65	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.15	12	0.50	41	0.27
Blumental 1952		58	0.56	12	0.02	36	0.09	39	0.22	26	0.24	43	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		16	0.67	69	0.00	15	0.09	18	0.53	12	0.58	20	0.55
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.50	37	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	42	0.19	66	0.09
Bunin 1987		83	0.41	78	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	49	0.05	85	0.04
Bunin 1987b		84	0.39	89	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	47	0.05	81	0.04
Chiu 1999		66	0.51	52	0.00	65	0.04	77	0.04	35	0.16	70	0.08
Cohen 1997		87	0.35	79	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.03	88	0.03
Cortot 1951		44	0.59	28	0.00	35	0.09	38	0.22	4	0.69	36	0.39
Csalog 1996		86	0.36	80	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	72	0.03	87	0.03
Czerny 1949		4	0.73	1	0.19	1	0.19	6	0.64	5	0.68	4	0.66
Czerny 1990		9	0.70	41	0.00	18	0.13	7	0.63	7	0.69	5	0.66
Duchoud 2007		70	0.49	71	0.00	72	0.08	45	0.08	10	0.43	47	0.19
Ezaki 2006		46	0.59	84	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	49	0.06	76	0.05
Falvay 1989		75	0.47	75	0.00	81	0.03	87	0.03	65	0.05	80	0.04
Farrell 1958		24	0.64	20	0.01	20	0.10	21	0.52	1	0.70	10	0.60
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.48	58	0.00	66	0.04	78	0.04	38	0.25	63	0.10
Fliere 1977		7	0.71	7	0.03	7	0.11	10	0.59	8	0.52	18	0.55
Fou 1978		14	0.68	13	0.02	10	0.13	12	0.58	6	0.60	14	0.59
Francois 1956		42	0.60	30	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	1	0.64	44	0.23
Friedman 1923		52	0.58	44	0.00	55	0.05	61	0.05	25	0.42	56	0.14
Friedman 1923b		47	0.59	43	0.00	49	0.06	53	0.06	20	0.47	50	0.17
Friedman 1930		53	0.58	62	0.00	54	0.04	69	0.04	24	0.45	58	0.13
Garcia 2007		33	0.61	70	0.00	37	0.09	34	0.36	4	0.60	29	0.46
Garcia 2007b		26	0.64	39	0.00	25	0.11	27	0.48	6	0.59	23	0.53
Gierzod 1998		3	0.73	2	0.18	2	0.20	2	0.70	6	0.65	3	0.67
Gornostaeva 1994		32	0.62	29	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	17	0.44	54	0.15
Groot 1988		74	0.48	31	0.00	53	0.05	66	0.05	51	0.06	78	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		8	0.71	4	0.08	6	0.20	11	0.59	12	0.61	12	0.60
Hatto 1993		43	0.59	51	0.00	27	0.13	22	0.51	16	0.40	32	0.45
Hatto 1997		40	0.60	33	0.00	28	0.12	26	0.50	15	0.41	31	0.45
Horowitz 1949		55	0.56	72	0.00	62	0.06	56	0.06	18	0.48	49	0.17
Indjic 1988		37	0.60	76	0.00	26	0.11	19	0.53	16	0.43	26	0.48
Kapell 1951		29	0.63	15	0.02	14	0.09	29	0.48	8	0.47	27	0.47
Kissin 1993		2	0.74	3	0.13	3	0.26	1	0.75	2	0.76	1	0.75
Kushner 1989		6	0.71	17	0.01	12	0.10	5	0.64	11	0.60	8	0.62
Luisada 1991		38	0.60	63	0.00	50	0.07	49	0.07	40	0.16	60	0.11
Lushtak 2004		54	0.57	36	0.00	56	0.04	68	0.04	33	0.23	65	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		51	0.58	5	0.04	51	0.06	54	0.06	19	0.38	53	0.15
Magaloff 1978		63	0.54	59	0.00	71	0.06	51	0.06	40	0.14	68	0.09
Magin 1975		18	0.67	19	0.01	19	0.13	24	0.51	7	0.55	22	0.53
Michalowski 1933		49	0.59	81	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	4	0.61	45	0.21
Milkina 1970		13	0.68	23	0.01	24	0.10	30	0.43	21	0.48	30	0.45
Mohovich 1999		59	0.55	53	0.00	57	0.05	65	0.05	43	0.12	71	0.08
Moravec 1969		77	0.45	60	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	46	0.06	77	0.05
Morozova 2008		22	0.65	35	0.00	31	0.10	32	0.41	7	0.51	28	0.46
Neighaus 1950		1	0.75	6	0.03	4	0.24	3	0.67	1	0.75	2	0.71
Niedzielski 1931		39	0.60	45	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.35	5	0.52	33	0.43
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.69	16	0.01	16	0.12	15	0.54	7	0.61	15	0.57
Osinska 1989		20	0.66	21	0.01	22	0.11	20	0.52	22	0.51	24	0.51
Pachmann 1927		78	0.44	55	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	53	0.05	83	0.04
Paderewski 1930		60	0.54	56	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	3	0.65	48	0.18
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.60	50	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.15	6	0.58	38	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.49	57	0.00	69	0.05	62	0.05	18	0.42	55	0.14
Poblocka 1999		15	0.67	18	0.01	17	0.13	8	0.61	7	0.60	9	0.60
Rabcewiczowa 1932		28	0.63	38	0.00	30	0.10	25	0.50	3	0.61	19	0.55
Rachmaninoff 1923		30	0.62	25	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.41	12	0.41	34	0.41
Rangell 2001		57	0.56	26	0.00	52	0.07	50	0.07	4	0.59	46	0.20
Richter 1976		31	0.62	8	0.03	41	0.07	41	0.18	6	0.64	37	0.34
Rosen 1989		27	0.63	42	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.23	22	0.36	39	0.29
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.46	66	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	33	0.25	64	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.43	67	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	42	0.16	73	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.42	82	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	40	0.16	74	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.43	85	0.00	84	0.04	76	0.04	47	0.06	79	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.39	90	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	58	0.04	89	0.03
Rossi 2007		73	0.48	54	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	38	0.22	67	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		62	0.54	27	0.00	64	0.05	63	0.05	35	0.26	61	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		69	0.49	22	0.01	63	0.04	70	0.04	54	0.05	86	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.59	83	0.00	59	0.05	59	0.05	36	0.25	62	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		23	0.65	34	0.00	23	0.14	23	0.51	12	0.57	21	0.54
Shebanova 2002		5	0.72	24	0.00	5	0.17	4	0.65	4	0.62	6	0.63
Smith 1975		45	0.59	68	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	16	0.37	52	0.15
Sokolov 2002		50	0.58	10	0.03	40	0.07	40	0.19	17	0.42	40	0.28
Sztompka 1959		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tomsic 1995		81	0.42	73	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	56	0.06	82	0.04
Uninsky 1932		19	0.66	32	0.00	21	0.11	17	0.53	3	0.61	16	0.57
Uninsky 1971		21	0.66	46	0.00	8	0.11	13	0.57	5	0.63	11	0.60
Wasowski 1980		17	0.67	14	0.02	11	0.10	16	0.54	2	0.65	13	0.59
Zak 1937		34	0.61	61	0.00	39	0.10	36	0.26	32	0.26	42	0.26
Zak 1951		41	0.60	77	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	58	0.06	69	0.09
Random 1		90	-0.09	86	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	28	0.19	84	0.04
Random 2		88	-0.06	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	66	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.06	87	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	29	0.20	75	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).