Sokolov 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.59	17	0.01	11	0.09	8	0.51	38	0.20	13	0.32
Anderszewski 2003		19	0.55	61	0.00	13	0.10	13	0.43	30	0.36	11	0.39
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.59	5	0.04	15	0.09	11	0.47	19	0.39	5	0.43
Bacha 2000		46	0.48	27	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	38	0.13	57	0.07
Badura 1965		44	0.49	42	0.00	27	0.05	33	0.23	31	0.33	18	0.28
Barbosa 1983		69	0.43	45	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.05	74	0.04
Biret 1990		8	0.60	19	0.01	17	0.08	15	0.42	40	0.14	22	0.24
Blet 2003		70	0.43	44	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	39	0.15	55	0.08
Block 1995		83	0.38	63	0.00	70	0.03	71	0.03	55	0.05	77	0.04
Blumental 1952		27	0.52	24	0.00	35	0.06	37	0.16	63	0.04	56	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.62	3	0.07	3	0.33	4	0.59	18	0.52	2	0.55
Brailowsky 1960		80	0.40	84	0.00	85	0.04	63	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.04
Bunin 1987		66	0.43	74	0.00	37	0.05	42	0.10	22	0.40	26	0.20
Bunin 1987b		74	0.42	82	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	27	0.38	27	0.17
Chiu 1999		76	0.41	85	0.00	73	0.03	68	0.03	73	0.04	84	0.03
Cohen 1997		86	0.34	64	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.04	88	0.03
Cortot 1951		81	0.38	65	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	53	0.05	79	0.04
Csalog 1996		59	0.45	25	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	49	0.05	65	0.05
Czerny 1949		32	0.51	55	0.00	34	0.06	32	0.23	49	0.06	40	0.12
Czerny 1990		35	0.51	47	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	65	0.04	69	0.05
Duchoud 2007		22	0.54	40	0.00	32	0.07	34	0.21	6	0.49	14	0.32
Ezaki 2006		20	0.55	7	0.03	10	0.09	10	0.47	26	0.38	6	0.42
Falvay 1989		63	0.44	11	0.02	55	0.05	52	0.05	45	0.09	58	0.07
Farrell 1958		25	0.53	23	0.00	38	0.05	43	0.09	64	0.05	59	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		84	0.37	72	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	53	0.04	87	0.03
Fliere 1977		18	0.55	41	0.00	14	0.12	16	0.42	63	0.04	31	0.13
Fou 1978		16	0.56	38	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.33	54	0.05	32	0.13
Francois 1956		51	0.47	21	0.01	61	0.05	49	0.05	35	0.27	41	0.12
Friedman 1923		73	0.42	76	0.00	74	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.05	81	0.04
Friedman 1923b		75	0.42	30	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	54	0.06	78	0.04
Friedman 1930		82	0.38	88	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	64	0.05	75	0.04
Garcia 2007		64	0.43	39	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.05	76	0.04
Garcia 2007b		61	0.44	89	0.00	64	0.03	74	0.03	69	0.04	90	0.03
Gierzod 1998		2	0.65	2	0.10	2	0.23	1	0.66	27	0.42	4	0.53
Gornostaeva 1994		24	0.53	10	0.03	20	0.09	23	0.32	21	0.37	12	0.34
Groot 1988		58	0.45	69	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.04	89	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		17	0.55	29	0.00	5	0.17	9	0.50	31	0.33	9	0.41
Hatto 1993		28	0.52	56	0.00	30	0.10	27	0.28	48	0.06	36	0.13
Hatto 1997		31	0.52	52	0.00	28	0.05	25	0.29	59	0.05	39	0.12
Horowitz 1949		78	0.40	90	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	45	0.08	64	0.05
Indjic 1988		30	0.52	59	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.28	52	0.05	38	0.12
Kapell 1951		23	0.53	50	0.00	24	0.06	22	0.33	63	0.04	42	0.11
Kissin 1993		3	0.62	12	0.02	4	0.16	3	0.60	25	0.48	3	0.54
Kushner 1989		12	0.59	13	0.01	21	0.08	19	0.40	51	0.06	30	0.15
Luisada 1991		21	0.55	15	0.01	19	0.10	18	0.41	37	0.17	19	0.26
Lushtak 2004		43	0.49	68	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	50	0.06	67	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.50	26	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.12	34	0.15	33	0.13
Magaloff 1978		36	0.51	34	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.04
Magin 1975		15	0.56	28	0.00	9	0.10	12	0.44	38	0.22	15	0.31
Michalowski 1933		57	0.45	80	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.12	20	0.38	25	0.21
Milkina 1970		5	0.61	16	0.01	8	0.14	5	0.57	37	0.29	8	0.41
Mohovich 1999		29	0.52	79	0.00	26	0.05	29	0.26	60	0.05	46	0.11
Moravec 1969		77	0.40	46	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	51	0.05	82	0.03
Morozova 2008		34	0.51	53	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.24	53	0.05	44	0.11
Neighaus 1950		14	0.56	57	0.00	23	0.08	24	0.31	27	0.30	16	0.30
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.42	37	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.06	63	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.67	1	0.38	1	0.38	2	0.65	5	0.62	1	0.63
Osinska 1989		40	0.49	66	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	65	0.05	62	0.05
Pachmann 1927		85	0.37	48	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	15	0.42	43	0.11
Paderewski 1930		79	0.40	60	0.00	83	0.03	70	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.47	70	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	43	0.12	52	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.42	54	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	40	0.21	54	0.08
Poblocka 1999		39	0.50	49	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.18	50	0.06	47	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		55	0.46	33	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.04	73	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		26	0.53	8	0.03	16	0.09	20	0.36	40	0.16	21	0.24
Rangell 2001		38	0.50	35	0.00	50	0.05	47	0.05	29	0.34	35	0.13
Richter 1976		54	0.46	31	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.11	32	0.41	24	0.21
Rosen 1989		33	0.51	43	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.15	54	0.05	50	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		48	0.48	77	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	22	0.45	34	0.13
Rosenthal 1931		60	0.44	86	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	31	0.26	49	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.43	83	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	27	0.28	60	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		45	0.49	81	0.00	56	0.06	45	0.06	18	0.47	28	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.43	73	0.00	80	0.03	72	0.03	32	0.30	51	0.09
Rossi 2007		87	0.33	36	0.00	87	0.04	64	0.04	73	0.04	71	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		50	0.48	51	0.00	63	0.03	67	0.03	68	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.49	6	0.03	54	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.05	80	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.49	62	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.06	66	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		49	0.48	18	0.01	41	0.06	35	0.20	40	0.13	29	0.16
Shebanova 2002		11	0.59	67	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.43	41	0.15	20	0.25
Smith 1975		47	0.48	58	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.13	53	0.08
Sokolov 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sztompka 1959		13	0.58	14	0.01	18	0.10	17	0.42	40	0.19	17	0.28
Tomsic 1995		67	0.43	22	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	35	0.28	48	0.09
Uninsky 1932		53	0.46	20	0.01	25	0.06	31	0.24	40	0.22	23	0.23
Uninsky 1971		62	0.44	32	0.00	33	0.08	28	0.27	66	0.05	37	0.12
Wasowski 1980		56	0.46	75	0.00	66	0.03	69	0.03	74	0.04	83	0.03
Zak 1937		7	0.60	4	0.06	6	0.16	6	0.53	28	0.34	7	0.42
Zak 1951		6	0.60	9	0.03	7	0.20	7	0.53	30	0.30	10	0.40
Random 1		89	-0.06	87	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	14	0.40	61	0.06
Random 2		88	0.06	71	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	2	0.56	45	0.11
Random 3		90	-0.07	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	21	0.25	68	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).