Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		22	0.58	49	0.00	37	0.07	33	0.23	60	0.05	50	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		11	0.62	27	0.01	14	0.09	23	0.32	39	0.22	21	0.27
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.58	32	0.00	24	0.07	21	0.33	26	0.30	19	0.31
Bacha 2000		58	0.50	47	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	19	0.36	30	0.15
Badura 1965		73	0.45	33	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	60	0.05	79	0.04
Barbosa 1983		41	0.54	37	0.00	17	0.08	22	0.32	24	0.44	10	0.38
Biret 1990		27	0.57	9	0.02	13	0.09	11	0.43	29	0.25	15	0.33
Blet 2003		49	0.52	52	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	41	0.11	59	0.07
Block 1995		67	0.48	65	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	38	0.16	57	0.08
Blumental 1952		23	0.58	15	0.01	8	0.15	8	0.53	15	0.37	7	0.44
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.61	21	0.01	15	0.09	18	0.35	39	0.19	22	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		7	0.64	6	0.03	9	0.18	7	0.54	2	0.77	1	0.64
Bunin 1987		86	0.30	87	0.00	86	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.04	80	0.04
Bunin 1987b		87	0.29	82	0.00	87	0.04	67	0.04	78	0.03	85	0.03
Chiu 1999		62	0.49	88	0.00	61	0.04	71	0.04	55	0.05	69	0.04
Cohen 1997		84	0.37	83	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	35	0.15	61	0.07
Cortot 1951		78	0.43	66	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.05	82	0.04
Csalog 1996		74	0.43	14	0.01	59	0.04	74	0.04	44	0.11	58	0.07
Czerny 1949		36	0.55	4	0.04	27	0.06	34	0.23	56	0.06	46	0.12
Czerny 1990		6	0.65	8	0.02	5	0.14	4	0.56	25	0.41	6	0.48
Duchoud 2007		81	0.42	68	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	50	0.06	78	0.04
Ezaki 2006		10	0.63	11	0.01	18	0.07	24	0.31	37	0.20	23	0.25
Falvay 1989		16	0.60	28	0.00	28	0.06	31	0.25	22	0.46	14	0.34
Farrell 1958		51	0.51	89	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.25	43	0.17	24	0.21
Ferenczy 1958		39	0.54	23	0.01	53	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.42	36	0.14
Fliere 1977		1	0.70	2	0.25	2	0.36	1	0.73	23	0.35	5	0.51
Fou 1978		25	0.58	38	0.00	30	0.05	26	0.29	63	0.05	43	0.12
Francois 1956		69	0.47	90	0.00	73	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.05	67	0.05
Friedman 1923		45	0.53	46	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	35	0.30	41	0.13
Friedman 1923b		44	0.54	18	0.01	50	0.04	66	0.04	33	0.35	47	0.12
Friedman 1930		35	0.55	34	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	30	0.38	35	0.14
Garcia 2007		79	0.42	48	0.00	83	0.04	76	0.04	83	0.03	88	0.03
Garcia 2007b		53	0.51	50	0.00	49	0.04	64	0.04	50	0.05	83	0.04
Gierzod 1998		3	0.67	12	0.01	6	0.12	3	0.61	38	0.22	12	0.37
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.66	10	0.01	7	0.15	6	0.55	5	0.61	2	0.58
Groot 1988		47	0.53	22	0.01	21	0.07	19	0.34	24	0.30	18	0.32
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.61	39	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.42	55	0.05	38	0.14
Hatto 1993		37	0.55	70	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.17	45	0.08	48	0.12
Hatto 1997		34	0.55	76	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	54	0.06	60	0.07
Horowitz 1949		75	0.43	74	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	58	0.06	71	0.04
Indjic 1988		33	0.56	45	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.20	45	0.07	45	0.12
Kapell 1951		38	0.54	31	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.16	59	0.05	55	0.09
Kissin 1993		19	0.59	29	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.19	51	0.06	49	0.11
Kushner 1989		14	0.61	13	0.01	19	0.08	14	0.40	50	0.06	31	0.15
Luisada 1991		9	0.64	5	0.03	4	0.14	5	0.56	7	0.54	3	0.55
Lushtak 2004		43	0.54	54	0.00	31	0.05	36	0.21	55	0.05	54	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		71	0.46	84	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	63	0.04	86	0.03
Magaloff 1978		28	0.57	3	0.06	10	0.10	17	0.36	11	0.43	9	0.39
Magin 1975		2	0.69	1	0.28	1	0.28	2	0.65	22	0.43	4	0.53
Michalowski 1933		63	0.48	71	0.00	75	0.03	87	0.03	48	0.08	65	0.05
Milkina 1970		12	0.61	17	0.01	12	0.10	10	0.44	40	0.23	17	0.32
Mohovich 1999		29	0.57	58	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.14	40	0.16	33	0.15
Moravec 1969		52	0.51	40	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	20	0.43	39	0.13
Morozova 2008		59	0.49	80	0.00	66	0.03	77	0.03	60	0.05	76	0.04
Neighaus 1950		42	0.54	36	0.00	36	0.05	39	0.17	33	0.23	25	0.20
Niedzielski 1931		66	0.48	60	0.00	58	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.04	84	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		46	0.53	35	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	60	0.05	63	0.06
Osinska 1989		8	0.64	51	0.00	11	0.10	9	0.47	37	0.22	16	0.32
Pachmann 1927		83	0.39	85	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.03	87	0.03
Paderewski 1930		85	0.37	56	0.00	84	0.05	52	0.05	50	0.04	73	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		68	0.48	86	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	50	0.05	68	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.43	72	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.05	70	0.04
Poblocka 1999		32	0.56	30	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	64	0.05	62	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		70	0.47	41	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.16	47	0.06	52	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		31	0.56	53	0.00	34	0.05	29	0.26	43	0.12	26	0.18
Rangell 2001		82	0.41	79	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	55	0.05	81	0.04
Richter 1976		77	0.43	24	0.01	56	0.04	75	0.04	54	0.05	72	0.04
Rosen 1989		4	0.66	7	0.02	3	0.11	12	0.42	17	0.40	8	0.41
Rosenthal 1930		55	0.50	42	0.00	63	0.04	73	0.04	19	0.49	37	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		61	0.49	59	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	16	0.50	34	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		60	0.49	78	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.53	29	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		50	0.52	57	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	13	0.57	27	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		57	0.50	62	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	9	0.61	28	0.16
Rossi 2007		72	0.45	63	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	37	0.24	51	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.54	26	0.01	29	0.05	32	0.24	27	0.34	20	0.29
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.53	25	0.01	23	0.09	20	0.33	26	0.37	13	0.35
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.60	16	0.01	22	0.08	15	0.39	29	0.36	11	0.37
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.50	19	0.01	70	0.05	50	0.05	71	0.04	75	0.04
Shebanova 2002		26	0.57	69	0.00	33	0.06	27	0.27	73	0.04	53	0.10
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sokolov 2002		64	0.48	55	0.00	40	0.07	44	0.13	50	0.05	56	0.08
Sztompka 1959		18	0.59	81	0.00	20	0.10	16	0.37	52	0.06	32	0.15
Tomsic 1995		80	0.42	64	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	57	0.06	64	0.05
Uninsky 1932		65	0.48	75	0.00	72	0.04	62	0.04	56	0.05	77	0.04
Uninsky 1971		56	0.50	44	0.00	71	0.05	51	0.05	73	0.04	74	0.04
Wasowski 1980		30	0.57	61	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.21	49	0.07	42	0.12
Zak 1937		21	0.59	20	0.01	26	0.06	28	0.27	61	0.05	44	0.12
Zak 1951		20	0.59	43	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.30	54	0.06	40	0.13
Random 1		89	-0.09	77	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	40	0.12	66	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.15	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.04	67	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	46	0.05	89	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).