Schilhawsky 1960

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		3	0.72	30	0.00	6	0.18	4	0.61	5	0.61	3	0.61
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.55	67	0.00	53	0.08	46	0.08	53	0.04	59	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.53	68	0.00	36	0.10	33	0.26	31	0.25	35	0.25
Bacha 2000		80	0.37	43	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	71	0.04	83	0.03
Badura 1965		35	0.57	22	0.01	29	0.08	39	0.19	24	0.38	32	0.27
Barbosa 1983		75	0.41	34	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	57	0.05	78	0.04
Biret 1990		57	0.50	10	0.01	47	0.05	52	0.05	51	0.05	70	0.05
Blet 2003		52	0.51	49	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	43	0.10	60	0.06
Block 1995		68	0.44	87	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	46	0.07	67	0.05
Blumental 1952		50	0.52	11	0.01	39	0.08	38	0.19	64	0.04	50	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		12	0.67	14	0.01	18	0.18	13	0.57	20	0.50	15	0.53
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.39	69	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.05	72	0.04
Bunin 1987		41	0.56	12	0.01	21	0.12	26	0.42	2	0.58	22	0.49
Bunin 1987b		44	0.54	44	0.00	22	0.12	28	0.41	2	0.57	23	0.48
Chiu 1999		70	0.43	24	0.00	57	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.03	84	0.03
Cohen 1997		87	0.24	88	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	82	0.03	88	0.03
Cortot 1951		30	0.58	77	0.00	35	0.11	31	0.38	2	0.71	16	0.52
Csalog 1996		82	0.37	73	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.03	87	0.03
Czerny 1949		1	0.76	1	0.39	1	0.39	1	0.73	3	0.70	1	0.71
Czerny 1990		19	0.64	27	0.00	32	0.09	25	0.43	43	0.13	37	0.24
Duchoud 2007		74	0.41	78	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	31	0.21	49	0.09
Ezaki 2006		27	0.59	47	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.10	51	0.06	52	0.08
Falvay 1989		84	0.30	60	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Farrell 1958		63	0.46	63	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	52	0.06	63	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.49	74	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.06	66	0.05
Fliere 1977		2	0.74	18	0.01	5	0.12	7	0.60	10	0.52	8	0.56
Fou 1978		56	0.50	70	0.00	58	0.04	64	0.04	74	0.04	77	0.04
Francois 1956		62	0.47	32	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	57	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1923		39	0.56	29	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	19	0.47	43	0.17
Friedman 1923b		37	0.56	79	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	21	0.47	42	0.17
Friedman 1930		38	0.56	82	0.00	51	0.07	47	0.07	28	0.41	41	0.17
Garcia 2007		49	0.52	48	0.00	52	0.10	44	0.10	20	0.45	39	0.21
Garcia 2007b		55	0.50	59	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.19	30	0.33	36	0.25
Gierzod 1998		6	0.70	13	0.01	9	0.11	5	0.61	23	0.47	14	0.54
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.47	72	0.00	70	0.05	55	0.05	57	0.04	79	0.04
Groot 1988		67	0.45	55	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.04	80	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.69	5	0.02	16	0.10	9	0.59	23	0.51	12	0.55
Hatto 1993		13	0.67	65	0.00	12	0.16	17	0.53	14	0.42	24	0.47
Hatto 1997		11	0.67	61	0.00	13	0.16	18	0.53	13	0.46	21	0.49
Horowitz 1949		29	0.59	41	0.00	30	0.10	29	0.40	1	0.61	20	0.49
Indjic 1988		10	0.68	64	0.00	11	0.13	15	0.54	13	0.47	17	0.50
Kapell 1951		32	0.58	53	0.00	26	0.10	24	0.44	29	0.24	31	0.32
Kissin 1993		8	0.70	20	0.01	8	0.20	6	0.60	14	0.60	4	0.60
Kushner 1989		34	0.57	42	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	61	0.05	64	0.05
Luisada 1991		31	0.58	84	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	59	0.05	61	0.05
Lushtak 2004		45	0.54	6	0.02	37	0.08	36	0.20	38	0.19	40	0.19
Malcuzynski 1961		36	0.56	19	0.01	15	0.11	34	0.26	15	0.44	30	0.34
Magaloff 1978		65	0.46	54	0.00	68	0.04	57	0.04	69	0.04	74	0.04
Magin 1975		18	0.64	25	0.00	19	0.16	16	0.54	20	0.45	19	0.49
Michalowski 1933		28	0.59	15	0.01	20	0.13	19	0.51	3	0.62	9	0.56
Milkina 1970		42	0.55	35	0.00	44	0.05	45	0.10	55	0.06	54	0.08
Mohovich 1999		66	0.46	62	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	53	0.06	69	0.05
Moravec 1969		72	0.42	39	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.06	71	0.04
Morozova 2008		23	0.61	28	0.00	33	0.12	30	0.39	28	0.34	28	0.36
Neighaus 1950		25	0.60	9	0.01	28	0.12	20	0.49	15	0.51	18	0.50
Niedzielski 1931		21	0.62	50	0.00	24	0.08	27	0.41	7	0.50	25	0.45
Ohlsson 1999		33	0.58	31	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.48	27	0.38	26	0.43
Osinska 1989		24	0.60	57	0.00	31	0.08	32	0.30	62	0.05	45	0.12
Pachmann 1927		64	0.46	66	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	41	0.16	58	0.07
Paderewski 1930		71	0.42	80	0.00	72	0.04	70	0.04	41	0.12	57	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.56	71	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.12	15	0.46	38	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.38	33	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	47	0.07	62	0.05
Poblocka 1999		7	0.70	7	0.01	7	0.17	11	0.58	12	0.53	10	0.55
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.53	51	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	43	0.10	53	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.65	3	0.11	4	0.18	8	0.59	6	0.56	6	0.57
Rangell 2001		85	0.29	52	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	65	0.04	89	0.03
Richter 1976		4	0.72	2	0.19	2	0.20	3	0.62	5	0.66	2	0.64
Rosen 1989		51	0.51	58	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	63	0.05	68	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		48	0.53	45	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	7	0.66	33	0.26
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.39	85	0.00	82	0.04	65	0.04	37	0.21	48	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.39	75	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	35	0.22	56	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.44	16	0.01	66	0.04	72	0.04	29	0.30	46	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.37	36	0.00	83	0.04	61	0.04	35	0.22	51	0.09
Rossi 2007		83	0.35	83	0.00	84	0.04	69	0.04	66	0.04	73	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		60	0.47	23	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	63	0.04	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		73	0.41	40	0.00	67	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.05	81	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		53	0.51	56	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	55	0.06	65	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		14	0.66	17	0.01	14	0.18	2	0.64	16	0.48	11	0.55
Smith 1975		54	0.50	26	0.00	63	0.04	71	0.04	50	0.05	75	0.04
Sokolov 2002		59	0.48	8	0.01	41	0.06	40	0.13	35	0.20	44	0.16
Sztompka 1959		16	0.65	38	0.00	17	0.13	12	0.57	23	0.51	13	0.54
Tomsic 1995		86	0.28	76	0.00	87	0.04	74	0.04	84	0.03	86	0.03
Uninsky 1932		15	0.66	37	0.00	10	0.11	14	0.55	6	0.59	7	0.57
Uninsky 1971		5	0.71	4	0.03	3	0.23	10	0.59	7	0.62	5	0.60
Wasowski 1980		26	0.59	21	0.01	34	0.09	35	0.24	33	0.26	34	0.25
Zak 1937		22	0.62	89	0.00	27	0.10	23	0.44	30	0.28	29	0.35
Zak 1951		20	0.62	46	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.45	27	0.33	27	0.39
Random 1		89	-0.02	90	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	18	0.36	55	0.08
Random 2		88	0.00	81	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	9	0.46	47	0.10
Random 3		90	-0.13	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	64	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).