Rubinstein 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		39	0.49	10	0.01	48	0.05	60	0.05	72	0.04	71	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		58	0.43	28	0.00	58	0.07	47	0.07	51	0.04	53	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.44	44	0.00	68	0.05	52	0.05	63	0.04	73	0.04
Bacha 2000		43	0.47	63	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.20	15	0.36	31	0.27
Badura 1965		82	0.31	80	0.00	82	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.04	72	0.04
Barbosa 1983		25	0.55	23	0.00	15	0.10	21	0.45	13	0.54	10	0.49
Biret 1990		21	0.56	55	0.00	20	0.10	16	0.48	32	0.23	27	0.33
Blet 2003		47	0.45	67	0.00	52	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.05	66	0.04
Block 1995		71	0.38	36	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.11	40	0.13	46	0.12
Blumental 1952		14	0.59	57	0.00	11	0.14	24	0.41	14	0.39	20	0.40
Boshniakovich 1969		69	0.39	60	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.04	84	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.48	13	0.01	40	0.06	39	0.17	19	0.47	30	0.28
Bunin 1987		83	0.31	81	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03
Bunin 1987b		85	0.29	82	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03
Chiu 1999		50	0.45	50	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.15	31	0.17	41	0.16
Cohen 1997		31	0.52	25	0.00	25	0.10	28	0.36	3	0.52	17	0.43
Cortot 1951		76	0.35	87	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	64	0.05	74	0.04
Csalog 1996		16	0.58	51	0.00	16	0.09	15	0.48	7	0.51	11	0.49
Czerny 1949		57	0.43	56	0.00	62	0.05	56	0.05	68	0.04	70	0.04
Czerny 1990		12	0.60	37	0.00	12	0.17	17	0.47	27	0.39	18	0.43
Duchoud 2007		68	0.40	73	0.00	75	0.02	87	0.02	57	0.05	83	0.03
Ezaki 2006		28	0.54	52	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.30	40	0.17	34	0.23
Falvay 1989		3	0.66	3	0.04	4	0.22	8	0.60	3	0.62	6	0.61
Farrell 1958		19	0.57	26	0.00	7	0.15	9	0.56	9	0.56	8	0.56
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.39	83	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	50	0.05	68	0.04
Fliere 1977		30	0.52	18	0.01	31	0.08	23	0.41	57	0.05	43	0.14
Fou 1978		7	0.62	16	0.01	10	0.21	7	0.60	14	0.49	9	0.54
Francois 1956		37	0.49	84	0.00	36	0.08	33	0.30	15	0.50	21	0.39
Friedman 1923		74	0.37	19	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	48	0.06	76	0.04
Friedman 1923b		75	0.36	43	0.00	74	0.05	57	0.05	66	0.05	56	0.05
Friedman 1930		79	0.32	46	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	77	0.04	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		67	0.40	68	0.00	67	0.05	61	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.05
Garcia 2007b		42	0.48	49	0.00	49	0.04	66	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.04
Gierzod 1998		24	0.55	31	0.00	34	0.08	27	0.36	55	0.06	42	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		63	0.41	58	0.00	60	0.07	45	0.07	59	0.03	57	0.05
Groot 1988		26	0.55	4	0.03	23	0.12	14	0.49	6	0.48	12	0.48
Harasiewicz 1955		49	0.45	42	0.00	46	0.07	48	0.07	59	0.05	51	0.06
Hatto 1993		54	0.44	69	0.00	56	0.06	51	0.06	65	0.04	59	0.05
Hatto 1997		53	0.44	64	0.00	50	0.05	62	0.05	56	0.05	54	0.05
Horowitz 1949		86	0.29	21	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	84	0.03	79	0.03
Indjic 1988		55	0.44	61	0.00	57	0.06	49	0.06	82	0.03	65	0.04
Kapell 1951		8	0.62	9	0.02	13	0.12	13	0.55	25	0.30	19	0.41
Kissin 1993		13	0.59	24	0.00	19	0.10	10	0.55	37	0.36	15	0.44
Kushner 1989		4	0.63	15	0.01	9	0.24	3	0.67	16	0.58	4	0.62
Luisada 1991		27	0.54	17	0.01	28	0.09	30	0.34	34	0.20	33	0.26
Lushtak 2004		6	0.62	20	0.00	3	0.18	6	0.63	6	0.62	5	0.62
Malcuzynski 1961		77	0.33	47	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03
Magaloff 1978		23	0.56	39	0.00	22	0.12	25	0.38	7	0.48	16	0.43
Magin 1975		36	0.49	5	0.02	30	0.07	36	0.23	41	0.18	37	0.20
Michalowski 1933		87	0.25	48	0.00	84	0.03	74	0.03	64	0.04	81	0.03
Milkina 1970		9	0.61	11	0.01	8	0.17	4	0.65	13	0.55	7	0.60
Mohovich 1999		5	0.63	7	0.02	5	0.17	5	0.63	7	0.66	3	0.64
Moravec 1969		32	0.51	14	0.01	41	0.06	43	0.13	24	0.38	36	0.22
Morozova 2008		33	0.51	45	0.00	35	0.08	31	0.32	42	0.17	35	0.23
Neighaus 1950		72	0.38	88	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.04	86	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		81	0.31	78	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.03	87	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		46	0.46	40	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	44	0.11	49	0.08
Osinska 1989		20	0.57	53	0.00	14	0.12	12	0.55	35	0.23	23	0.36
Pachmann 1927		80	0.32	65	0.00	83	0.04	67	0.04	28	0.29	47	0.11
Paderewski 1930		78	0.33	85	0.00	76	0.02	86	0.02	45	0.05	80	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		35	0.50	27	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.15	49	0.06	48	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		59	0.42	79	0.00	53	0.04	63	0.04	49	0.06	52	0.05
Poblocka 1999		34	0.51	6	0.02	29	0.07	35	0.25	42	0.15	38	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.59	86	0.00	6	0.17	19	0.46	10	0.48	13	0.47
Rachmaninoff 1923		65	0.41	8	0.02	33	0.07	34	0.26	41	0.14	39	0.19
Rangell 2001		60	0.42	41	0.00	47	0.05	59	0.05	52	0.05	58	0.05
Richter 1976		84	0.30	29	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04	62	0.04
Rosen 1989		17	0.57	34	0.00	24	0.12	22	0.43	32	0.27	26	0.34
Rosenthal 1930		73	0.37	74	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	43	0.12	50	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		48	0.45	89	0.00	51	0.04	70	0.04	17	0.47	44	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		52	0.44	75	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	17	0.47	40	0.18
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.47	70	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.20	20	0.46	29	0.30
Rosenthal 1931d		62	0.42	71	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	22	0.45	45	0.13
Rossi 2007		61	0.42	62	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.16	12	0.45	32	0.27
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.74	2	0.35	2	0.60	2	0.75	1	0.78	2	0.76
Rubinstein 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.74	1	0.36	1	0.36	1	0.80	1	0.78	1	0.79
Schilhawsky 1960		66	0.41	38	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.04	67	0.04
Shebanova 2002		18	0.57	12	0.01	18	0.08	11	0.55	39	0.18	28	0.31
Smith 1975		29	0.53	22	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.37	20	0.33	24	0.35
Sokolov 2002		40	0.49	54	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.04	61	0.04
Sztompka 1959		38	0.49	32	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.04	63	0.04
Tomsic 1995		22	0.56	33	0.00	26	0.07	29	0.35	6	0.61	14	0.46
Uninsky 1932		56	0.43	72	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	60	0.04	69	0.04
Uninsky 1971		64	0.41	66	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	65	0.05	64	0.04
Wasowski 1980		45	0.46	30	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.04	60	0.04
Zak 1937		11	0.60	35	0.00	21	0.12	18	0.47	31	0.26	25	0.35
Zak 1951		10	0.61	59	0.00	17	0.08	20	0.45	31	0.30	22	0.37
Random 1		90	-0.08	76	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	51	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.01	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	45	0.05	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.08	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	53	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).