Rossi 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		21	0.51	12	0.02	38	0.08	36	0.24	80	0.03	41	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		15	0.54	73	0.00	30	0.09	25	0.33	74	0.03	37	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.43	33	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	82	0.03	83	0.03
Bacha 2000		11	0.55	78	0.00	22	0.05	22	0.35	39	0.13	14	0.21
Badura 1965		65	0.39	60	0.00	73	0.04	81	0.04	82	0.03	82	0.03
Barbosa 1983		67	0.39	75	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.05	51	0.05
Biret 1990		8	0.55	62	0.00	10	0.16	8	0.52	77	0.04	24	0.14
Blet 2003		57	0.41	41	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.03	76	0.03
Block 1995		70	0.38	65	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	62	0.05	53	0.05
Blumental 1952		4	0.57	10	0.02	9	0.13	7	0.52	70	0.04	22	0.14
Boshniakovich 1969		49	0.44	23	0.01	51	0.06	53	0.06	81	0.04	54	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		72	0.36	86	0.00	81	0.03	87	0.03	85	0.03	69	0.03
Bunin 1987		86	0.17	53	0.00	87	0.04	79	0.04	84	0.03	84	0.03
Bunin 1987b		87	0.17	54	0.00	86	0.04	80	0.04	81	0.03	70	0.03
Chiu 1999		13	0.54	51	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.21	70	0.04	38	0.09
Cohen 1997		25	0.49	25	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.15	25	0.27	15	0.20
Cortot 1951		69	0.38	63	0.00	71	0.04	78	0.04	43	0.10	46	0.06
Csalog 1996		66	0.39	16	0.01	14	0.11	27	0.32	34	0.18	12	0.24
Czerny 1949		36	0.46	34	0.00	53	0.07	48	0.07	80	0.03	52	0.05
Czerny 1990		6	0.56	42	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.39	73	0.04	30	0.12
Duchoud 2007		78	0.31	39	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03
Ezaki 2006		3	0.58	15	0.01	13	0.12	6	0.55	48	0.06	17	0.18
Falvay 1989		16	0.53	30	0.00	16	0.11	9	0.48	26	0.40	3	0.44
Farrell 1958		5	0.57	3	0.09	2	0.21	3	0.57	14	0.50	1	0.53
Ferenczy 1958		55	0.42	82	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	76	0.03	64	0.04
Fliere 1977		31	0.48	43	0.00	49	0.08	46	0.08	85	0.03	47	0.05
Fou 1978		9	0.55	26	0.00	19	0.08	15	0.41	55	0.05	20	0.14
Francois 1956		35	0.47	20	0.01	26	0.05	32	0.29	47	0.06	27	0.13
Friedman 1923		51	0.43	35	0.00	68	0.05	56	0.05	71	0.05	56	0.05
Friedman 1923b		48	0.44	49	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.03	85	0.03
Friedman 1930		47	0.44	71	0.00	67	0.04	63	0.04	65	0.05	63	0.04
Garcia 2007		14	0.54	22	0.01	12	0.10	4	0.56	17	0.49	2	0.52
Garcia 2007b		17	0.52	6	0.04	8	0.10	10	0.46	35	0.23	8	0.33
Gierzod 1998		20	0.51	32	0.00	25	0.06	20	0.36	62	0.04	29	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.49	27	0.00	27	0.05	29	0.32	53	0.04	33	0.11
Groot 1988		68	0.39	83	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	82	0.04	55	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.55	7	0.03	20	0.08	24	0.33	67	0.04	34	0.11
Hatto 1993		46	0.45	87	0.00	63	0.04	76	0.04	79	0.03	86	0.03
Hatto 1997		38	0.46	88	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	81	0.03	78	0.03
Horowitz 1949		83	0.29	61	0.00	84	0.04	75	0.04	87	0.02	71	0.03
Indjic 1988		39	0.46	89	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	81	0.03	75	0.03
Kapell 1951		53	0.43	40	0.00	24	0.05	26	0.33	72	0.04	32	0.11
Kissin 1993		33	0.47	58	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.26	64	0.04	36	0.10
Kushner 1989		42	0.46	56	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.13	84	0.02	48	0.05
Luisada 1991		27	0.49	80	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.26	64	0.05	31	0.11
Lushtak 2004		54	0.43	79	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	77	0.03	66	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.51	2	0.15	4	0.15	5	0.56	20	0.35	4	0.44
Magaloff 1978		29	0.48	29	0.00	33	0.07	30	0.30	47	0.06	25	0.13
Magin 1975		62	0.40	47	0.00	50	0.06	54	0.06	77	0.03	59	0.04
Michalowski 1933		81	0.30	59	0.00	83	0.04	69	0.04	86	0.03	74	0.03
Milkina 1970		2	0.59	5	0.07	3	0.24	2	0.59	54	0.06	16	0.19
Mohovich 1999		40	0.46	36	0.00	34	0.09	19	0.37	63	0.05	23	0.14
Moravec 1969		19	0.51	18	0.01	15	0.11	13	0.44	21	0.40	5	0.42
Morozova 2008		58	0.41	72	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	85	0.02	77	0.03
Neighaus 1950		63	0.40	76	0.00	69	0.06	55	0.06	87	0.03	68	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.46	11	0.02	21	0.06	23	0.33	52	0.05	26	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		61	0.40	17	0.01	59	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.04	60	0.04
Osinska 1989		1	0.61	1	0.25	1	0.25	1	0.67	40	0.14	9	0.31
Pachmann 1927		71	0.37	66	0.00	82	0.04	72	0.04	85	0.02	73	0.03
Paderewski 1930		24	0.49	31	0.00	31	0.07	33	0.27	25	0.35	10	0.31
Perlemuter 1992		22	0.50	14	0.01	42	0.05	40	0.18	77	0.03	42	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		34	0.47	9	0.03	6	0.08	17	0.40	14	0.45	6	0.42
Poblocka 1999		84	0.28	44	0.00	79	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.04	57	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.46	74	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	76	0.04	43	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.48	64	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	54	0.05	40	0.08
Rangell 2001		64	0.40	19	0.01	29	0.07	31	0.29	41	0.19	13	0.23
Richter 1976		85	0.23	21	0.01	85	0.04	83	0.04	84	0.02	72	0.03
Rosen 1989		12	0.54	13	0.01	7	0.09	16	0.41	60	0.05	21	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.29	84	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.31	85	0.00	77	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.33	77	0.00	75	0.03	86	0.03	67	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		74	0.33	67	0.00	70	0.04	74	0.04	74	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.33	81	0.00	76	0.04	60	0.04	51	0.05	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.48	52	0.00	23	0.06	14	0.42	46	0.06	19	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		56	0.42	4	0.07	5	0.10	12	0.45	40	0.16	11	0.27
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.55	8	0.03	11	0.12	11	0.45	50	0.07	18	0.18
Schilhawsky 1960		73	0.35	69	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.04	62	0.04
Shebanova 2002		59	0.40	68	0.00	61	0.04	82	0.04	87	0.02	79	0.03
Smith 1975		44	0.45	70	0.00	28	0.05	37	0.24	69	0.04	35	0.10
Sokolov 2002		76	0.33	38	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	64	0.04	58	0.04
Sztompka 1959		30	0.48	48	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.22	72	0.04	39	0.09
Tomsic 1995		50	0.44	24	0.01	32	0.07	28	0.32	30	0.35	7	0.33
Uninsky 1932		60	0.40	55	0.00	62	0.04	77	0.04	66	0.04	65	0.04
Uninsky 1971		79	0.31	37	0.00	72	0.05	58	0.05	70	0.05	50	0.05
Wasowski 1980		26	0.49	28	0.00	17	0.08	21	0.36	70	0.04	28	0.12
Zak 1937		41	0.46	50	0.00	46	0.09	45	0.09	79	0.04	44	0.06
Zak 1951		45	0.45	45	0.00	45	0.07	47	0.07	75	0.04	49	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.20	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.12	57	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	74	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.06	46	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	37	0.16	45	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).