Rosenthal 1931b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.44	55	0.00	28	0.08	22	0.36	83	0.03	28	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		29	0.44	17	0.00	36	0.08	31	0.27	81	0.03	32	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		43	0.39	23	0.00	21	0.08	23	0.35	76	0.03	29	0.10
Bacha 2000		38	0.40	8	0.00	20	0.07	30	0.27	76	0.03	30	0.09
Badura 1965		86	0.23	16	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03
Barbosa 1983		87	0.20	24	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	87	0.02	73	0.03
Biret 1990		12	0.50	5	0.00	15	0.10	13	0.54	55	0.05	17	0.16
Blet 2003		44	0.39	29	0.00	46	0.05	61	0.05	83	0.02	74	0.03
Block 1995		81	0.28	20	0.00	73	0.05	64	0.05	87	0.02	79	0.03
Blumental 1952		15	0.49	13	0.00	9	0.18	6	0.65	77	0.04	16	0.16
Boshniakovich 1969		54	0.35	46	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.47	56	0.00	18	0.11	15	0.50	33	0.28	9	0.37
Bunin 1987		83	0.25	68	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	90	0.02
Bunin 1987b		84	0.25	69	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.03
Chiu 1999		82	0.26	70	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.04	50	0.04
Cohen 1997		77	0.28	39	0.00	24	0.07	37	0.18	33	0.19	11	0.18
Cortot 1951		71	0.31	57	0.00	80	0.04	73	0.04	83	0.03	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		23	0.46	11	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.29	54	0.05	23	0.12
Czerny 1949		50	0.37	58	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	86	0.02	76	0.03
Czerny 1990		16	0.49	71	0.00	10	0.20	12	0.55	61	0.05	13	0.17
Duchoud 2007		76	0.29	72	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	72	0.04	58	0.04
Ezaki 2006		30	0.43	32	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.41	81	0.03	24	0.11
Falvay 1989		20	0.47	73	0.00	19	0.16	18	0.47	50	0.07	10	0.18
Farrell 1958		59	0.35	74	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	85	0.03	46	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.35	30	0.00	68	0.05	57	0.05	72	0.03	57	0.04
Fliere 1977		13	0.49	12	0.00	17	0.10	19	0.45	81	0.03	21	0.12
Fou 1978		34	0.42	31	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.31	58	0.05	22	0.12
Francois 1956		49	0.37	47	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	72	0.04	48	0.05
Friedman 1923		70	0.31	14	0.00	69	0.05	56	0.05	83	0.03	64	0.04
Friedman 1923b		68	0.31	6	0.00	65	0.05	62	0.05	83	0.03	60	0.04
Friedman 1930		52	0.36	59	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	78	0.04	56	0.04
Garcia 2007		64	0.33	36	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		57	0.35	60	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.04
Gierzod 1998		22	0.47	75	0.00	34	0.07	29	0.28	78	0.03	33	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		9	0.53	76	0.00	12	0.18	10	0.59	49	0.04	18	0.15
Groot 1988		42	0.39	40	0.00	25	0.08	28	0.28	87	0.03	36	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		55	0.35	48	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	65	0.04	62	0.04
Hatto 1993		75	0.30	49	0.00	64	0.05	65	0.05	78	0.03	61	0.04
Hatto 1997		72	0.30	41	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Horowitz 1949		66	0.32	61	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	88	0.02	85	0.02
Indjic 1988		73	0.30	62	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	78	0.03	72	0.03
Kapell 1951		18	0.47	63	0.00	33	0.06	34	0.25	76	0.04	26	0.10
Kissin 1993		37	0.41	50	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	76	0.03	54	0.04
Kushner 1989		17	0.48	42	0.00	31	0.06	25	0.31	82	0.03	25	0.10
Luisada 1991		48	0.37	22	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	71	0.04	45	0.05
Lushtak 2004		67	0.32	51	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	76	0.03	59	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		24	0.45	18	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.27	69	0.04	27	0.10
Magaloff 1978		10	0.51	64	0.00	16	0.10	16	0.50	52	0.05	14	0.16
Magin 1975		8	0.53	9	0.00	11	0.15	7	0.65	83	0.03	19	0.14
Michalowski 1933		39	0.40	15	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.12	72	0.03	44	0.06
Milkina 1970		11	0.50	37	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.42	74	0.04	20	0.13
Mohovich 1999		32	0.43	52	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.19	70	0.04	35	0.09
Moravec 1969		5	0.58	77	0.00	5	0.36	8	0.65	8	0.60	5	0.62
Morozova 2008		58	0.35	43	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	79	0.03	55	0.04
Neighaus 1950		62	0.33	78	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		21	0.47	10	0.00	8	0.18	9	0.61	26	0.30	7	0.43
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.36	79	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	81	0.04	53	0.04
Osinska 1989		28	0.44	53	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.18	86	0.03	38	0.07
Pachmann 1927		69	0.31	33	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.02	86	0.02
Paderewski 1930		61	0.34	25	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.34	80	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	83	0.03	49	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		74	0.30	81	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	76	0.04	67	0.03
Poblocka 1999		36	0.41	21	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	87	0.02	65	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		6	0.55	26	0.00	7	0.34	11	0.59	22	0.30	8	0.42
Rachmaninoff 1923		7	0.53	19	0.00	6	0.31	5	0.69	22	0.32	6	0.47
Rangell 2001		65	0.32	82	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03
Richter 1976		85	0.24	65	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	88	0.02	69	0.03
Rosen 1989		25	0.44	34	0.00	30	0.07	33	0.27	84	0.03	34	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.79	4	0.01	4	0.82	4	0.93	2	0.92	4	0.92
Rosenthal 1931		1	0.92	1	0.68	1	0.67	2	0.96	1	0.96	2	0.96
Rosenthal 1931b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.88	3	0.09	3	0.84	3	0.95	2	0.96	3	0.95
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.90	2	0.20	2	0.72	1	0.97	1	0.97	1	0.97
Rossi 2007		63	0.33	27	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	86	0.03	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		41	0.39	38	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.18	49	0.05	31	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		27	0.44	28	0.00	14	0.15	17	0.47	46	0.07	12	0.18
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.40	83	0.00	50	0.09	45	0.09	85	0.03	47	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		45	0.39	84	0.00	26	0.07	35	0.22	82	0.03	37	0.08
Shebanova 2002		35	0.42	85	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.16	83	0.03	42	0.07
Smith 1975		14	0.49	44	0.00	13	0.22	14	0.53	56	0.05	15	0.16
Sokolov 2002		31	0.43	66	0.00	35	0.08	27	0.28	87	0.02	39	0.07
Sztompka 1959		33	0.42	54	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.16	81	0.03	40	0.07
Tomsic 1995		80	0.28	67	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.02
Uninsky 1932		51	0.36	35	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.12	75	0.04	41	0.07
Uninsky 1971		78	0.28	86	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	83	0.04	71	0.03
Wasowski 1980		79	0.28	87	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	83	0.03	83	0.02
Zak 1937		46	0.38	88	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	86	0.03	51	0.04
Zak 1951		47	0.37	7	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	86	0.03	52	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.11	45	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	59	0.03	87	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.03	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	29	0.22	43	0.07
Random 3		90	-0.12	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	80	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).