Rosenthal 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		33	0.44	60	0.00	39	0.09	28	0.27	71	0.04	28	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		28	0.45	18	0.00	26	0.06	24	0.32	78	0.03	27	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.38	80	0.00	34	0.06	38	0.21	85	0.03	39	0.08
Bacha 2000		47	0.38	47	0.00	30	0.05	40	0.18	82	0.03	40	0.07
Badura 1965		84	0.25	81	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	68	0.05	60	0.04
Barbosa 1983		87	0.22	82	0.00	57	0.06	54	0.06	81	0.03	55	0.04
Biret 1990		21	0.46	42	0.00	21	0.10	20	0.42	87	0.03	23	0.11
Blet 2003		49	0.38	39	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	77	0.03	48	0.05
Block 1995		66	0.32	7	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	76	0.04	61	0.04
Blumental 1952		18	0.47	53	0.00	10	0.15	8	0.60	60	0.04	14	0.15
Boshniakovich 1969		55	0.35	68	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.50	9	0.00	14	0.16	9	0.58	24	0.41	6	0.49
Bunin 1987		85	0.24	16	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.03	87	0.02
Bunin 1987b		86	0.23	34	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	68	0.03
Chiu 1999		83	0.25	61	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.03	65	0.03
Cohen 1997		81	0.26	69	0.00	29	0.05	43	0.15	46	0.06	35	0.09
Cortot 1951		64	0.33	70	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		31	0.44	12	0.00	24	0.06	25	0.30	51	0.05	21	0.12
Czerny 1949		43	0.39	62	0.00	51	0.06	56	0.06	77	0.03	59	0.04
Czerny 1990		12	0.50	83	0.00	8	0.12	11	0.55	68	0.04	15	0.15
Duchoud 2007		79	0.27	84	0.00	70	0.03	69	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03
Ezaki 2006		24	0.46	26	0.00	18	0.16	12	0.55	67	0.04	13	0.15
Falvay 1989		17	0.48	30	0.00	17	0.14	18	0.47	53	0.06	11	0.17
Farrell 1958		52	0.37	6	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	70	0.04	46	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.35	71	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	86	0.02	75	0.03
Fliere 1977		16	0.48	35	0.00	20	0.11	22	0.39	80	0.03	22	0.11
Fou 1978		35	0.44	19	0.00	22	0.11	21	0.40	78	0.04	19	0.13
Francois 1956		60	0.33	63	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Friedman 1923		68	0.32	85	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	76	0.04	83	0.03
Friedman 1923b		67	0.32	43	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	77	0.04	62	0.04
Friedman 1930		57	0.35	20	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	85	0.03	74	0.03
Garcia 2007		72	0.31	86	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		61	0.33	54	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	72	0.04	82	0.03
Gierzod 1998		20	0.47	87	0.00	36	0.06	26	0.29	86	0.02	37	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		9	0.53	72	0.00	11	0.17	14	0.52	56	0.04	17	0.14
Groot 1988		51	0.37	13	0.00	25	0.06	35	0.23	83	0.04	30	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		54	0.36	17	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	64	0.04	50	0.05
Hatto 1993		77	0.30	55	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	87	0.03	80	0.03
Hatto 1997		75	0.31	88	0.00	68	0.06	52	0.06	85	0.03	57	0.04
Horowitz 1949		65	0.33	36	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.04	70	0.03
Indjic 1988		74	0.31	27	0.00	67	0.04	66	0.04	87	0.03	73	0.03
Kapell 1951		14	0.50	21	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.33	84	0.03	25	0.10
Kissin 1993		34	0.44	73	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.26	70	0.04	26	0.10
Kushner 1989		19	0.47	31	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.22	79	0.03	36	0.08
Luisada 1991		41	0.39	22	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	83	0.03	51	0.04
Lushtak 2004		59	0.33	23	0.00	33	0.06	41	0.16	83	0.03	44	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.46	56	0.00	41	0.08	33	0.24	85	0.02	41	0.07
Magaloff 1978		11	0.51	14	0.00	16	0.15	15	0.51	51	0.06	10	0.17
Magin 1975		8	0.53	48	0.00	9	0.13	7	0.63	64	0.04	12	0.16
Michalowski 1933		39	0.40	74	0.00	55	0.06	47	0.06	71	0.04	47	0.05
Milkina 1970		10	0.51	40	0.00	19	0.10	19	0.46	81	0.03	20	0.12
Mohovich 1999		29	0.45	15	0.00	35	0.07	29	0.26	66	0.04	29	0.10
Moravec 1969		5	0.59	28	0.00	5	0.47	6	0.64	6	0.63	5	0.63
Morozova 2008		46	0.38	75	0.00	47	0.06	53	0.06	81	0.03	56	0.04
Neighaus 1950		69	0.32	76	0.00	80	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.04	79	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		25	0.45	37	0.00	12	0.13	13	0.52	40	0.15	9	0.28
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.38	49	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	87	0.03	54	0.04
Osinska 1989		26	0.45	5	0.00	38	0.07	32	0.25	83	0.03	31	0.09
Pachmann 1927		62	0.33	50	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	78	0.03	85	0.02
Paderewski 1930		73	0.31	57	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.03	71	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		63	0.33	25	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	64	0.04	64	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.27	89	0.00	87	0.04	65	0.04	86	0.03	66	0.03
Poblocka 1999		22	0.46	10	0.00	42	0.08	34	0.24	68	0.04	24	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		6	0.56	58	0.00	7	0.35	10	0.57	23	0.29	8	0.41
Rachmaninoff 1923		7	0.53	24	0.00	6	0.32	5	0.68	27	0.28	7	0.44
Rangell 2001		58	0.34	32	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Richter 1976		82	0.25	51	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.03	84	0.02
Rosen 1989		32	0.44	44	0.00	43	0.09	39	0.20	80	0.03	38	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.77	4	0.01	4	0.77	4	0.88	4	0.89	4	0.88
Rosenthal 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.92	1	0.88	1	0.87	1	0.96	2	0.96	2	0.96
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.87	3	0.02	3	0.83	3	0.94	3	0.94	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.88	2	0.07	2	0.77	2	0.96	2	0.97	1	0.96
Rossi 2007		71	0.31	64	0.00	69	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.04	52	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		38	0.40	45	0.00	31	0.05	27	0.28	78	0.03	33	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		27	0.45	65	0.00	13	0.14	17	0.47	70	0.04	18	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.41	90	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	62	0.05	49	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		42	0.39	46	0.00	27	0.06	37	0.21	65	0.04	34	0.09
Shebanova 2002		40	0.40	59	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	84	0.03	58	0.04
Smith 1975		15	0.49	11	0.00	15	0.15	16	0.50	61	0.04	16	0.14
Sokolov 2002		30	0.44	77	0.00	37	0.06	31	0.26	84	0.03	32	0.09
Sztompka 1959		36	0.43	29	0.00	44	0.08	42	0.16	86	0.03	42	0.07
Tomsic 1995		76	0.30	66	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.04	69	0.03
Uninsky 1932		44	0.38	78	0.00	28	0.06	44	0.13	72	0.04	43	0.07
Uninsky 1971		78	0.29	79	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.03	72	0.03
Wasowski 1980		70	0.31	41	0.00	79	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.04	63	0.03
Zak 1937		50	0.37	52	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	87	0.02	67	0.03
Zak 1951		53	0.36	8	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	85	0.03	53	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.12	67	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	72	0.02	86	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.02	38	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	32	0.19	45	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.15	33	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).