Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.68	19	0.01	10	0.25	6	0.61	12	0.53	8	0.57
Anderszewski 2003		28	0.59	46	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.28	29	0.37	23	0.32
Ashkenazy 1981		44	0.55	38	0.00	47	0.05	67	0.05	38	0.18	66	0.09
Bacha 2000		55	0.53	23	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.10	13	0.41	41	0.20
Badura 1965		61	0.52	56	0.00	65	0.06	53	0.06	34	0.30	59	0.13
Barbosa 1983		72	0.49	77	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	32	0.32	58	0.13
Biret 1990		35	0.57	49	0.00	37	0.06	34	0.26	37	0.19	39	0.22
Blet 2003		49	0.54	68	0.00	66	0.06	51	0.06	17	0.36	50	0.15
Block 1995		71	0.50	17	0.01	36	0.06	36	0.19	17	0.41	31	0.28
Blumental 1952		39	0.56	12	0.01	13	0.10	16	0.40	19	0.34	18	0.37
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.62	45	0.00	32	0.07	35	0.24	40	0.17	43	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.53	63	0.00	69	0.05	69	0.05	27	0.38	53	0.14
Bunin 1987		87	0.33	82	0.00	87	0.04	78	0.04	50	0.05	84	0.04
Bunin 1987b		86	0.34	61	0.00	86	0.04	76	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.04
Chiu 1999		53	0.53	39	0.00	46	0.05	68	0.05	7	0.41	55	0.14
Cohen 1997		84	0.40	24	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	22	0.30	62	0.11
Cortot 1951		85	0.37	75	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		42	0.55	47	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.12	13	0.43	37	0.23
Czerny 1949		57	0.53	87	0.00	55	0.05	73	0.05	60	0.05	78	0.05
Czerny 1990		20	0.62	52	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.32	42	0.15	38	0.22
Duchoud 2007		59	0.53	20	0.01	48	0.05	56	0.05	5	0.53	48	0.16
Ezaki 2006		15	0.64	22	0.01	30	0.06	28	0.29	28	0.32	26	0.30
Falvay 1989		25	0.60	33	0.00	49	0.06	52	0.06	16	0.48	46	0.17
Farrell 1958		67	0.51	72	0.00	62	0.06	47	0.06	57	0.06	73	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.57	13	0.01	23	0.06	38	0.17	4	0.57	25	0.31
Fliere 1977		2	0.71	9	0.05	5	0.15	2	0.71	17	0.47	7	0.58
Fou 1978		10	0.67	16	0.01	11	0.13	11	0.52	13	0.50	12	0.51
Francois 1956		45	0.55	48	0.00	51	0.05	61	0.05	20	0.47	51	0.15
Friedman 1923		47	0.55	36	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	23	0.43	52	0.15
Friedman 1923b		46	0.55	30	0.00	57	0.08	46	0.08	26	0.42	44	0.18
Friedman 1930		40	0.56	35	0.00	58	0.08	45	0.08	18	0.49	42	0.20
Garcia 2007		50	0.54	78	0.00	60	0.06	50	0.06	24	0.41	49	0.16
Garcia 2007b		24	0.60	29	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.27	21	0.46	21	0.35
Gierzod 1998		3	0.71	4	0.09	3	0.14	3	0.68	18	0.54	5	0.61
Gornostaeva 1994		12	0.65	57	0.00	14	0.12	13	0.49	7	0.59	11	0.54
Groot 1988		58	0.53	15	0.01	18	0.08	27	0.31	14	0.39	20	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.62	42	0.00	17	0.10	24	0.34	40	0.17	35	0.24
Hatto 1993		33	0.58	66	0.00	27	0.08	19	0.39	36	0.21	30	0.29
Hatto 1997		32	0.58	73	0.00	28	0.06	21	0.36	35	0.17	34	0.25
Horowitz 1949		83	0.42	88	0.00	75	0.05	72	0.05	57	0.06	75	0.05
Indjic 1988		29	0.59	40	0.00	26	0.07	18	0.39	34	0.22	29	0.29
Kapell 1951		23	0.61	27	0.00	33	0.09	23	0.35	40	0.18	33	0.25
Kissin 1993		14	0.65	18	0.01	16	0.13	14	0.43	33	0.36	16	0.39
Kushner 1989		6	0.68	3	0.10	7	0.21	10	0.58	20	0.54	9	0.56
Luisada 1991		8	0.68	2	0.13	2	0.16	7	0.60	4	0.69	2	0.64
Lushtak 2004		54	0.53	37	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.05	79	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		66	0.51	62	0.00	72	0.06	48	0.06	58	0.04	74	0.05
Magaloff 1978		60	0.52	54	0.00	63	0.04	74	0.04	42	0.11	72	0.07
Magin 1975		1	0.71	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.71	2	0.64	1	0.67
Michalowski 1933		65	0.51	43	0.00	71	0.05	71	0.05	32	0.26	61	0.11
Milkina 1970		4	0.70	5	0.08	6	0.17	4	0.67	11	0.60	3	0.63
Mohovich 1999		13	0.65	7	0.05	9	0.24	8	0.60	10	0.64	4	0.62
Moravec 1969		73	0.48	60	0.00	74	0.05	62	0.05	34	0.21	63	0.10
Morozova 2008		34	0.58	32	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.17	34	0.27	40	0.21
Neighaus 1950		64	0.51	90	0.00	68	0.04	77	0.04	67	0.04	85	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.51	25	0.00	54	0.05	64	0.05	31	0.25	60	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		18	0.63	14	0.01	15	0.10	12	0.50	14	0.49	13	0.49
Osinska 1989		5	0.70	11	0.02	8	0.24	5	0.63	16	0.57	6	0.60
Pachmann 1927		74	0.47	58	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	24	0.36	69	0.08
Paderewski 1930		81	0.43	79	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	48	0.04	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.55	34	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.16	18	0.44	32	0.27
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.54	74	0.00	70	0.05	65	0.05	22	0.40	56	0.14
Poblocka 1999		30	0.58	76	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.15	39	0.19	45	0.17
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.54	83	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.19	27	0.27	36	0.23
Rachmaninoff 1923		62	0.52	59	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.04	81	0.04
Rangell 2001		75	0.47	28	0.00	73	0.05	70	0.05	44	0.16	67	0.09
Richter 1976		77	0.45	26	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.05	83	0.04
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.45	41	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	52	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.44	84	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	39	0.20	70	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.44	64	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	33	0.27	68	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.46	67	0.00	77	0.04	79	0.04	34	0.26	64	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.43	80	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	29	0.32	71	0.08
Rossi 2007		48	0.54	31	0.00	50	0.05	60	0.05	16	0.41	54	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.55	50	0.00	59	0.06	49	0.06	33	0.31	57	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.57	21	0.01	22	0.07	32	0.27	22	0.43	22	0.34
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.60	85	0.00	25	0.07	31	0.28	31	0.34	24	0.31
Schilhawsky 1960		63	0.51	70	0.00	61	0.05	63	0.05	54	0.05	76	0.05
Shebanova 2002		9	0.67	6	0.07	4	0.13	9	0.60	14	0.50	10	0.55
Smith 1975		11	0.66	8	0.05	12	0.11	17	0.40	12	0.42	15	0.41
Sokolov 2002		68	0.51	55	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.15	65	0.09
Sztompka 1959		16	0.63	51	0.00	21	0.08	22	0.36	37	0.23	28	0.29
Tomsic 1995		37	0.57	10	0.02	19	0.09	30	0.28	5	0.63	14	0.42
Uninsky 1932		70	0.50	81	0.00	67	0.05	66	0.05	48	0.06	77	0.05
Uninsky 1971		31	0.58	71	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.13	36	0.21	47	0.17
Wasowski 1980		27	0.59	65	0.00	35	0.11	25	0.33	22	0.43	17	0.38
Zak 1937		19	0.62	44	0.00	24	0.05	20	0.37	33	0.23	27	0.29
Zak 1951		17	0.63	86	0.00	20	0.10	15	0.40	28	0.32	19	0.36
Random 1		90	-0.10	89	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	25	0.23	80	0.05
Random 2		88	-0.06	53	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	50	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.08	69	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).