Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		57	0.38	88	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	85	0.02	81	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		19	0.48	4	0.06	2	0.13	8	0.54	38	0.25	4	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.39	76	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	84	0.03	82	0.03
Bacha 2000		55	0.39	37	0.00	50	0.05	60	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.05
Badura 1965		74	0.31	75	0.00	66	0.05	59	0.05	79	0.03	68	0.04
Barbosa 1983		60	0.36	26	0.00	24	0.05	31	0.31	65	0.04	39	0.11
Biret 1990		12	0.50	23	0.01	19	0.10	14	0.46	66	0.04	30	0.14
Blet 2003		70	0.33	40	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.03	78	0.03
Block 1995		33	0.44	43	0.00	12	0.08	17	0.43	25	0.28	6	0.35
Blumental 1952		65	0.34	21	0.01	58	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05	53	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		8	0.51	13	0.02	8	0.13	6	0.54	56	0.05	24	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		83	0.28	78	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Bunin 1987		64	0.35	27	0.00	61	0.03	79	0.03	56	0.05	69	0.04
Bunin 1987b		71	0.33	89	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.04
Chiu 1999		73	0.32	61	0.00	56	0.06	46	0.06	66	0.04	50	0.05
Cohen 1997		84	0.27	49	0.00	71	0.05	61	0.05	41	0.11	47	0.07
Cortot 1951		39	0.44	45	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.27	29	0.33	9	0.30
Csalog 1996		62	0.36	85	0.00	51	0.04	69	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.04
Czerny 1949		22	0.48	7	0.03	18	0.12	18	0.42	53	0.06	23	0.16
Czerny 1990		16	0.49	11	0.03	16	0.10	9	0.53	63	0.05	25	0.16
Duchoud 2007		37	0.44	22	0.01	42	0.07	43	0.18	39	0.16	20	0.17
Ezaki 2006		31	0.45	10	0.03	17	0.12	15	0.46	46	0.07	18	0.18
Falvay 1989		18	0.48	72	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.27	38	0.22	13	0.24
Farrell 1958		29	0.46	8	0.03	7	0.12	5	0.57	38	0.24	3	0.37
Ferenczy 1958		77	0.29	73	0.00	81	0.05	50	0.05	71	0.03	65	0.04
Fliere 1977		54	0.39	86	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	84	0.03	56	0.04
Fou 1978		27	0.46	52	0.00	22	0.05	25	0.38	65	0.04	34	0.12
Francois 1956		34	0.44	19	0.01	34	0.06	34	0.27	48	0.06	32	0.13
Friedman 1923		85	0.27	39	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.27	67	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	83	0.03
Friedman 1930		82	0.28	34	0.00	78	0.04	72	0.04	79	0.04	64	0.04
Garcia 2007		45	0.41	79	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	63	0.04	52	0.05
Garcia 2007b		38	0.44	64	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	83	0.03	71	0.04
Gierzod 1998		10	0.51	62	0.00	30	0.08	23	0.39	77	0.03	40	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.52	66	0.00	14	0.14	19	0.39	34	0.17	11	0.26
Groot 1988		56	0.38	77	0.00	40	0.07	42	0.18	70	0.04	44	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		15	0.49	2	0.07	3	0.15	3	0.59	56	0.05	21	0.17
Hatto 1993		81	0.28	32	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	83	0.03	70	0.04
Hatto 1997		78	0.29	82	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	83	0.03	80	0.03
Horowitz 1949		69	0.33	65	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.04	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		76	0.30	44	0.00	63	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03
Kapell 1951		4	0.54	5	0.05	10	0.10	11	0.50	55	0.05	22	0.16
Kissin 1993		17	0.49	33	0.00	32	0.08	16	0.43	57	0.05	26	0.15
Kushner 1989		1	0.58	1	0.32	1	0.31	1	0.71	30	0.32	1	0.48
Luisada 1991		61	0.36	74	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	76	0.03	72	0.03
Lushtak 2004		44	0.41	9	0.03	15	0.10	20	0.39	34	0.22	10	0.29
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.53	14	0.02	6	0.14	12	0.48	22	0.33	2	0.40
Magaloff 1978		50	0.40	18	0.01	59	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.04	73	0.03
Magin 1975		23	0.47	41	0.00	25	0.05	26	0.37	63	0.04	33	0.12
Michalowski 1933		63	0.35	57	0.00	72	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04
Milkina 1970		2	0.57	6	0.05	4	0.22	2	0.60	48	0.06	17	0.19
Mohovich 1999		25	0.47	12	0.02	35	0.06	27	0.35	68	0.04	37	0.12
Moravec 1969		49	0.40	36	0.00	73	0.06	48	0.06	71	0.03	55	0.04
Morozova 2008		41	0.43	20	0.01	27	0.05	35	0.27	70	0.04	42	0.10
Neighaus 1950		20	0.48	17	0.01	20	0.05	28	0.35	75	0.04	38	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		87	0.27	90	0.00	80	0.04	66	0.04	70	0.03	75	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.48	54	0.00	29	0.07	24	0.38	72	0.04	36	0.12
Osinska 1989		9	0.51	38	0.00	9	0.15	7	0.54	50	0.07	16	0.19
Pachmann 1927		59	0.37	60	0.00	62	0.03	80	0.03	39	0.18	45	0.07
Paderewski 1930		40	0.43	29	0.00	21	0.06	38	0.27	26	0.33	8	0.30
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.39	68	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	79	0.03	57	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		14	0.49	69	0.00	23	0.05	30	0.33	21	0.40	5	0.36
Poblocka 1999		28	0.46	51	0.00	44	0.10	40	0.20	59	0.05	41	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		35	0.44	50	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	68	0.04	59	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		79	0.29	80	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.03	74	0.03
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976		58	0.37	58	0.00	60	0.04	73	0.04	59	0.05	61	0.04
Rosen 1989		26	0.47	47	0.00	43	0.08	44	0.16	70	0.05	43	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.33	30	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		66	0.34	56	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	76	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		72	0.32	83	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.34	84	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.30	87	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		51	0.40	16	0.01	37	0.06	41	0.19	31	0.29	14	0.23
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.42	42	0.00	41	0.09	39	0.21	44	0.09	28	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.42	28	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	59	0.05	54	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.44	59	0.00	39	0.06	33	0.28	44	0.10	19	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		80	0.29	53	0.00	77	0.04	65	0.04	80	0.03	79	0.03
Shebanova 2002		6	0.52	15	0.01	11	0.09	13	0.46	59	0.05	27	0.15
Smith 1975		46	0.41	70	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	70	0.04	58	0.04
Sokolov 2002		13	0.50	48	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.34	47	0.05	31	0.13
Sztompka 1959		3	0.56	3	0.06	5	0.11	4	0.59	50	0.07	15	0.20
Tomsic 1995		32	0.45	35	0.00	38	0.06	32	0.29	31	0.34	7	0.31
Uninsky 1932		48	0.40	31	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	78	0.04	66	0.04
Uninsky 1971		47	0.41	25	0.00	57	0.06	47	0.06	64	0.05	51	0.05
Wasowski 1980		11	0.50	24	0.01	13	0.10	10	0.50	43	0.13	12	0.25
Zak 1937		24	0.47	46	0.00	31	0.08	22	0.39	71	0.04	35	0.12
Zak 1951		30	0.46	63	0.00	26	0.06	21	0.39	71	0.05	29	0.14
Random 1		90	-0.07	81	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	16	0.39	48	0.06
Random 2		89	-0.01	55	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	34	0.16	67	0.04
Random 3		88	-0.01	71	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	6	0.46	46	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).