Pachmann 1927

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.48	63	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.24	78	0.03	40	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.47	82	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.18	65	0.04	38	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.39	56	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	72	0.03	58	0.04
Bacha 2000		73	0.35	73	0.00	69	0.03	69	0.03	86	0.03	61	0.03
Badura 1965		35	0.44	11	0.02	25	0.08	21	0.38	71	0.04	15	0.12
Barbosa 1983		85	0.27	74	0.00	72	0.03	70	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.03
Biret 1990		48	0.40	60	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	85	0.03	80	0.03
Blet 2003		83	0.31	37	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	67	0.03	71	0.03
Block 1995		58	0.38	88	0.00	50	0.04	57	0.04	85	0.03	76	0.03
Blumental 1952		71	0.36	62	0.00	70	0.03	64	0.03	73	0.04	77	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		1	0.59	1	0.27	1	0.26	1	0.66	67	0.04	5	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.33	75	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.03	83	0.02
Bunin 1987		55	0.38	13	0.01	47	0.08	45	0.08	73	0.03	51	0.05
Bunin 1987b		69	0.37	46	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	55	0.05	48	0.05
Chiu 1999		50	0.39	41	0.00	71	0.05	51	0.05	76	0.03	53	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.24	70	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Cortot 1951		86	0.26	66	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02
Csalog 1996		76	0.33	77	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	84	0.03	55	0.04
Czerny 1949		10	0.49	10	0.03	11	0.08	16	0.42	79	0.03	24	0.11
Czerny 1990		12	0.49	12	0.02	10	0.08	11	0.47	74	0.04	9	0.14
Duchoud 2007		53	0.38	20	0.01	48	0.07	47	0.07	66	0.05	46	0.06
Ezaki 2006		27	0.46	5	0.04	26	0.09	23	0.38	80	0.03	18	0.11
Falvay 1989		23	0.46	25	0.00	21	0.08	22	0.38	64	0.05	7	0.14
Farrell 1958		45	0.41	78	0.00	33	0.06	25	0.34	82	0.03	27	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.38	53	0.00	79	0.02	82	0.02	57	0.04	73	0.03
Fliere 1977		5	0.51	43	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.42	83	0.03	19	0.11
Fou 1978		18	0.47	44	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.42	84	0.03	21	0.11
Francois 1956		38	0.43	61	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.15	75	0.03	45	0.07
Friedman 1923		67	0.37	52	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		59	0.38	45	0.00	74	0.04	61	0.04	85	0.03	79	0.03
Friedman 1930		42	0.42	21	0.01	75	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Garcia 2007		60	0.38	54	0.00	68	0.03	67	0.03	75	0.04	75	0.03
Garcia 2007b		54	0.38	33	0.00	62	0.03	72	0.03	77	0.04	82	0.03
Gierzod 1998		3	0.53	19	0.01	4	0.17	5	0.51	81	0.03	14	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		4	0.53	24	0.00	16	0.09	9	0.49	67	0.03	17	0.12
Groot 1988		84	0.31	83	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.04	59	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.49	42	0.00	28	0.09	31	0.26	87	0.03	34	0.09
Hatto 1993		74	0.35	84	0.00	64	0.03	71	0.03	86	0.03	81	0.03
Hatto 1997		63	0.37	79	0.00	63	0.04	59	0.04	86	0.03	72	0.03
Horowitz 1949		79	0.32	55	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.03	84	0.02
Indjic 1988		66	0.37	85	0.00	65	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03	69	0.03
Kapell 1951		22	0.46	39	0.00	17	0.07	10	0.49	86	0.02	28	0.10
Kissin 1993		9	0.50	40	0.00	12	0.08	12	0.47	79	0.03	13	0.12
Kushner 1989		2	0.54	2	0.25	2	0.35	2	0.59	55	0.06	3	0.19
Luisada 1991		44	0.41	80	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	69	0.04	42	0.07
Lushtak 2004		29	0.46	30	0.00	9	0.09	13	0.47	81	0.03	16	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.42	3	0.06	5	0.09	33	0.25	75	0.03	33	0.09
Magaloff 1978		40	0.42	38	0.00	34	0.07	38	0.20	77	0.03	36	0.08
Magin 1975		8	0.50	4	0.05	3	0.16	4	0.55	72	0.04	6	0.15
Michalowski 1933		21	0.46	27	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.29	62	0.04	22	0.11
Milkina 1970		14	0.48	57	0.00	31	0.06	27	0.31	86	0.02	37	0.08
Mohovich 1999		43	0.42	51	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	83	0.03	50	0.05
Moravec 1969		72	0.36	28	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	78	0.03	62	0.03
Morozova 2008		33	0.45	64	0.00	23	0.11	19	0.41	78	0.03	23	0.11
Neighaus 1950		15	0.48	49	0.00	39	0.06	32	0.25	68	0.04	31	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.33	76	0.00	85	0.02	80	0.02	65	0.04	67	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.43	65	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.29	54	0.05	12	0.12
Osinska 1989		13	0.48	18	0.01	38	0.06	42	0.15	69	0.04	35	0.08
Pachmann 1927		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Paderewski 1930		6	0.51	9	0.03	7	0.12	7	0.50	31	0.26	1	0.36
Perlemuter 1992		26	0.46	50	0.00	55	0.05	50	0.05	57	0.04	52	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		32	0.45	6	0.03	8	0.11	14	0.46	43	0.17	2	0.28
Poblocka 1999		24	0.46	17	0.01	30	0.06	26	0.31	86	0.03	26	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		7	0.50	8	0.03	6	0.09	3	0.59	80	0.03	10	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923		52	0.38	86	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	87	0.02	65	0.03
Rangell 2001		70	0.37	22	0.01	27	0.08	39	0.18	80	0.03	44	0.07
Richter 1976		28	0.46	23	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.22	61	0.05	29	0.10
Rosen 1989		19	0.47	36	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.36	86	0.02	41	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		41	0.42	34	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	66	0.03	57	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.33	29	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.31	67	0.00	82	0.02	81	0.02	81	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.37	89	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	83	0.03	60	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.31	71	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		68	0.37	47	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	72	0.04	64	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.41	16	0.01	35	0.06	37	0.21	72	0.04	32	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.32	7	0.03	15	0.09	28	0.29	67	0.04	25	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.38	72	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	82	0.04	56	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		25	0.46	68	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.16	84	0.03	43	0.07
Shebanova 2002		30	0.45	48	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.22	82	0.03	39	0.08
Smith 1975		51	0.39	87	0.00	66	0.03	66	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.03
Sokolov 2002		64	0.37	32	0.00	20	0.09	15	0.42	85	0.03	20	0.11
Sztompka 1959		36	0.44	31	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	80	0.03	54	0.04
Tomsic 1995		34	0.44	15	0.01	22	0.08	20	0.39	66	0.05	8	0.14
Uninsky 1932		56	0.38	81	0.00	67	0.03	65	0.03	74	0.04	74	0.03
Uninsky 1971		47	0.40	58	0.00	61	0.03	75	0.03	82	0.04	68	0.03
Wasowski 1980		62	0.37	35	0.00	73	0.03	68	0.03	78	0.04	63	0.03
Zak 1937		17	0.47	26	0.00	14	0.13	8	0.50	82	0.03	11	0.12
Zak 1951		31	0.45	14	0.01	13	0.11	6	0.50	66	0.05	4	0.16
Random 1		89	-0.08	59	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	26	0.23	49	0.05
Random 2		88	0.00	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	3	0.55	30	0.10
Random 3		90	-0.09	69	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	14	0.33	47	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).