Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.67	8	0.02	3	0.22	4	0.62	8	0.58	6	0.60
Anderszewski 2003		16	0.63	22	0.01	21	0.09	33	0.32	24	0.43	31	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.66	20	0.01	11	0.10	9	0.56	4	0.59	9	0.57
Bacha 2000		44	0.54	79	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	8	0.43	44	0.15
Badura 1965		31	0.58	41	0.00	26	0.07	32	0.33	10	0.55	19	0.43
Barbosa 1983		69	0.46	68	0.00	70	0.04	80	0.04	55	0.05	78	0.04
Biret 1990		33	0.57	44	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.13	36	0.20	42	0.16
Blet 2003		68	0.46	71	0.00	71	0.05	62	0.05	42	0.11	67	0.07
Block 1995		74	0.44	82	0.00	60	0.05	52	0.05	34	0.19	59	0.10
Blumental 1952		73	0.44	83	0.00	73	0.05	58	0.05	81	0.04	82	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.63	7	0.02	15	0.10	24	0.41	25	0.45	20	0.43
Brailowsky 1960		66	0.46	76	0.00	75	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.05	71	0.04
Bunin 1987		71	0.45	50	0.00	54	0.05	61	0.05	9	0.49	41	0.16
Bunin 1987b		72	0.45	72	0.00	47	0.04	68	0.04	8	0.50	47	0.14
Chiu 1999		48	0.53	46	0.00	50	0.04	66	0.04	20	0.31	56	0.11
Cohen 1997		81	0.40	38	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	32	0.20	62	0.08
Cortot 1951		77	0.41	77	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	50	0.05	83	0.04
Csalog 1996		85	0.35	84	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	53	0.05	80	0.04
Czerny 1949		23	0.61	65	0.00	31	0.10	25	0.39	32	0.39	29	0.39
Czerny 1990		26	0.60	17	0.01	37	0.06	39	0.14	49	0.07	60	0.10
Duchoud 2007		10	0.64	16	0.01	9	0.13	10	0.56	1	0.77	2	0.66
Ezaki 2006		39	0.55	39	0.00	48	0.04	71	0.04	43	0.13	65	0.07
Falvay 1989		67	0.46	40	0.00	68	0.04	78	0.04	68	0.05	73	0.04
Farrell 1958		29	0.58	28	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.20	39	0.23	37	0.21
Ferenczy 1958		80	0.40	89	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	78	0.03	88	0.03
Fliere 1977		5	0.68	4	0.04	4	0.20	6	0.62	13	0.49	10	0.55
Fou 1978		38	0.56	75	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.05	70	0.05
Francois 1956		50	0.52	54	0.00	61	0.06	45	0.06	24	0.44	43	0.16
Friedman 1923		35	0.56	37	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	33	0.32	49	0.14
Friedman 1923b		37	0.56	32	0.00	51	0.05	64	0.05	35	0.33	51	0.13
Friedman 1930		42	0.55	33	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	32	0.31	54	0.12
Garcia 2007		47	0.53	73	0.00	49	0.04	65	0.04	10	0.52	48	0.14
Garcia 2007b		40	0.55	80	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.34	11	0.52	24	0.42
Gierzod 1998		2	0.71	2	0.16	2	0.38	2	0.71	16	0.59	3	0.65
Gornostaeva 1994		45	0.54	35	0.00	63	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.10	63	0.08
Groot 1988		65	0.47	47	0.00	35	0.06	37	0.19	40	0.12	46	0.15
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.61	56	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.45	29	0.41	21	0.43
Hatto 1993		13	0.63	57	0.00	19	0.11	21	0.44	22	0.36	27	0.40
Hatto 1997		15	0.63	63	0.00	20	0.08	23	0.42	21	0.36	28	0.39
Horowitz 1949		61	0.47	78	0.00	64	0.04	77	0.04	33	0.34	52	0.12
Indjic 1988		11	0.64	60	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.46	22	0.37	26	0.41
Kapell 1951		53	0.52	43	0.00	36	0.06	42	0.13	46	0.07	58	0.10
Kissin 1993		27	0.60	42	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.36	35	0.36	32	0.36
Kushner 1989		4	0.69	6	0.03	8	0.15	3	0.66	17	0.57	5	0.61
Luisada 1991		30	0.58	29	0.00	32	0.08	29	0.35	28	0.31	33	0.33
Lushtak 2004		28	0.59	23	0.01	12	0.09	17	0.46	7	0.58	12	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		62	0.47	70	0.00	74	0.05	51	0.05	67	0.04	77	0.04
Magaloff 1978		51	0.52	9	0.02	44	0.06	43	0.13	59	0.04	66	0.07
Magin 1975		20	0.62	26	0.01	5	0.19	8	0.57	15	0.49	11	0.53
Michalowski 1933		56	0.51	58	0.00	55	0.06	49	0.06	10	0.48	40	0.17
Milkina 1970		25	0.60	10	0.02	25	0.09	22	0.43	30	0.42	23	0.42
Mohovich 1999		34	0.56	30	0.00	33	0.08	31	0.33	23	0.44	30	0.38
Moravec 1969		87	0.31	61	0.00	87	0.04	74	0.04	83	0.03	86	0.03
Morozova 2008		24	0.61	21	0.01	17	0.08	13	0.52	8	0.51	14	0.51
Neighaus 1950		6	0.67	27	0.01	10	0.12	11	0.56	5	0.60	7	0.58
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.48	55	0.00	67	0.05	59	0.05	61	0.04	75	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		19	0.62	15	0.01	24	0.10	18	0.46	30	0.39	22	0.42
Pachmann 1927		75	0.43	81	0.00	80	0.05	54	0.05	30	0.29	53	0.12
Paderewski 1930		76	0.42	85	0.00	78	0.03	86	0.03	51	0.04	87	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.52	69	0.00	45	0.04	67	0.04	19	0.44	50	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.49	36	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.13	9	0.50	34	0.25
Poblocka 1999		41	0.55	48	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.39	24	0.44	25	0.41
Rabcewiczowa 1932		63	0.47	67	0.00	69	0.04	73	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.54	49	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.27	36	0.21	36	0.24
Rangell 2001		60	0.48	45	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	24	0.38	55	0.12
Richter 1976		55	0.51	53	0.00	56	0.06	47	0.06	21	0.50	39	0.17
Rosen 1989		18	0.63	34	0.00	23	0.09	14	0.49	12	0.50	15	0.49
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.41	62	0.00	81	0.05	63	0.05	53	0.04	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.38	51	0.00	83	0.03	87	0.03	57	0.05	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.36	90	0.00	85	0.04	81	0.04	55	0.05	84	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		83	0.38	59	0.00	84	0.04	76	0.04	58	0.04	85	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.35	86	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	70	0.04	89	0.03
Rossi 2007		79	0.40	12	0.01	82	0.04	75	0.04	71	0.04	72	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.52	52	0.00	65	0.04	79	0.04	58	0.04	74	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		70	0.46	24	0.01	43	0.05	44	0.11	50	0.06	64	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		22	0.61	25	0.01	38	0.07	35	0.21	33	0.29	35	0.25
Schilhawsky 1960		32	0.58	13	0.01	29	0.10	27	0.38	21	0.48	18	0.43
Shebanova 2002		1	0.72	1	0.36	1	0.36	1	0.75	2	0.67	1	0.71
Smith 1975		46	0.53	66	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	47	0.07	69	0.06
Sokolov 2002		8	0.67	3	0.07	6	0.14	5	0.62	2	0.65	4	0.63
Sztompka 1959		3	0.69	5	0.03	7	0.18	7	0.61	15	0.54	8	0.57
Tomsic 1995		58	0.49	18	0.01	59	0.05	56	0.05	21	0.46	45	0.15
Uninsky 1932		64	0.47	74	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.25	57	0.11
Uninsky 1971		49	0.53	11	0.01	16	0.09	20	0.45	21	0.49	17	0.47
Wasowski 1980		36	0.56	31	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.14	30	0.30	38	0.20
Zak 1937		17	0.63	19	0.01	14	0.09	15	0.48	15	0.48	16	0.48
Zak 1951		12	0.63	14	0.01	13	0.09	12	0.52	13	0.51	13	0.51
Random 1		90	-0.14	64	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.00	87	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	19	0.32	61	0.08
Random 3		89	-0.05	88	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	23	0.24	68	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).