Kissin 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.75	20	0.00	3	0.19	5	0.69	2	0.63	5	0.66
Anderszewski 2003		31	0.62	22	0.00	37	0.08	34	0.36	20	0.46	29	0.41
Ashkenazy 1981		26	0.63	6	0.02	21	0.08	31	0.37	13	0.46	31	0.41
Bacha 2000		86	0.39	53	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.03	87	0.02
Badura 1965		35	0.60	79	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.31	11	0.55	30	0.41
Barbosa 1983		75	0.47	26	0.00	67	0.04	74	0.04	66	0.04	80	0.04
Biret 1990		46	0.57	69	0.00	49	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.04	77	0.05
Blet 2003		54	0.55	40	0.00	61	0.04	66	0.04	30	0.22	69	0.09
Block 1995		61	0.51	76	0.00	60	0.04	69	0.04	42	0.11	73	0.07
Blumental 1952		53	0.55	42	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.14	36	0.17	51	0.15
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.70	2	0.05	5	0.18	15	0.59	6	0.61	14	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		83	0.41	70	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	62	0.05	78	0.04
Bunin 1987		81	0.41	55	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	55	0.05	86	0.03
Bunin 1987b		84	0.40	60	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	45	0.06	79	0.04
Chiu 1999		71	0.48	58	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	48	0.06	75	0.05
Cohen 1997		87	0.31	56	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	66	0.04	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		64	0.50	41	0.00	70	0.03	82	0.03	20	0.47	57	0.12
Csalog 1996		67	0.50	30	0.00	64	0.06	54	0.06	25	0.31	53	0.14
Czerny 1949		15	0.68	11	0.01	7	0.17	8	0.65	8	0.59	10	0.62
Czerny 1990		4	0.72	24	0.00	8	0.16	6	0.67	8	0.67	4	0.67
Duchoud 2007		79	0.45	74	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	38	0.17	70	0.08
Ezaki 2006		17	0.68	16	0.01	22	0.09	30	0.40	17	0.54	25	0.46
Falvay 1989		48	0.56	46	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	37	0.24	65	0.10
Farrell 1958		45	0.57	34	0.00	39	0.08	40	0.28	19	0.45	38	0.35
Ferenczy 1958		73	0.48	81	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.03	84	0.03
Fliere 1977		19	0.67	36	0.00	19	0.11	22	0.50	33	0.22	40	0.33
Fou 1978		18	0.67	39	0.00	20	0.10	21	0.50	12	0.51	23	0.50
Francois 1956		63	0.51	78	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	33	0.30	58	0.12
Friedman 1923		57	0.53	75	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	29	0.37	59	0.12
Friedman 1923b		55	0.54	64	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	18	0.48	46	0.17
Friedman 1930		66	0.50	84	0.00	73	0.05	60	0.05	38	0.22	68	0.10
Garcia 2007		62	0.51	85	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	46	0.07	76	0.05
Garcia 2007b		59	0.52	65	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	68	0.04	83	0.04
Gierzod 1998		1	0.79	1	0.59	1	0.58	1	0.83	1	0.79	1	0.81
Gornostaeva 1994		47	0.57	54	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	33	0.21	63	0.11
Groot 1988		78	0.45	77	0.00	66	0.04	75	0.04	55	0.05	81	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.72	3	0.04	4	0.15	3	0.73	6	0.70	3	0.71
Hatto 1993		37	0.60	71	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.45	23	0.34	35	0.39
Hatto 1997		33	0.61	9	0.02	23	0.11	23	0.49	16	0.39	26	0.44
Horowitz 1949		58	0.53	86	0.00	63	0.06	55	0.06	28	0.45	48	0.16
Indjic 1988		32	0.62	59	0.00	24	0.10	24	0.48	19	0.39	28	0.43
Kapell 1951		34	0.61	45	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.37	33	0.24	41	0.30
Kissin 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1989		21	0.67	32	0.00	32	0.10	27	0.47	26	0.48	24	0.47
Luisada 1991		24	0.65	19	0.01	30	0.11	36	0.36	16	0.42	32	0.39
Lushtak 2004		36	0.60	68	0.00	42	0.09	41	0.24	25	0.36	42	0.29
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.58	21	0.00	41	0.08	42	0.24	10	0.48	39	0.34
Magaloff 1978		51	0.56	48	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	18	0.37	49	0.15
Magin 1975		11	0.70	28	0.00	12	0.08	11	0.61	11	0.53	17	0.57
Michalowski 1933		65	0.50	87	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.47	50	0.15
Milkina 1970		16	0.68	29	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.59	12	0.59	15	0.59
Mohovich 1999		49	0.56	72	0.00	45	0.06	53	0.06	38	0.20	62	0.11
Moravec 1969		60	0.52	57	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	25	0.37	54	0.12
Morozova 2008		13	0.69	44	0.00	13	0.08	13	0.61	3	0.62	11	0.61
Neighaus 1950		28	0.63	43	0.00	26	0.09	19	0.51	8	0.59	18	0.55
Niedzielski 1931		50	0.56	73	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.15	22	0.40	43	0.24
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.60	35	0.00	38	0.09	35	0.36	28	0.36	37	0.36
Osinska 1989		20	0.67	37	0.00	18	0.13	18	0.55	27	0.47	21	0.51
Pachmann 1927		68	0.50	51	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	12	0.47	56	0.12
Paderewski 1930		76	0.47	62	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	27	0.33	66	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		39	0.60	49	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	20	0.42	47	0.16
Pierdomenico 2008		69	0.50	63	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	27	0.34	55	0.12
Poblocka 1999		7	0.71	8	0.02	9	0.11	7	0.66	4	0.64	6	0.65
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.55	61	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	36	0.18	61	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.58	50	0.00	27	0.09	29	0.41	19	0.36	36	0.38
Rangell 2001		70	0.49	31	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	16	0.43	52	0.15
Richter 1976		22	0.67	12	0.01	29	0.09	26	0.47	7	0.63	20	0.54
Rosen 1989		25	0.65	5	0.03	34	0.11	33	0.36	14	0.43	34	0.39
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.48	88	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	35	0.23	71	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.44	89	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	30	0.26	67	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.41	90	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	49	0.05	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.46	47	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	35	0.24	72	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.39	82	0.00	87	0.04	67	0.04	44	0.13	74	0.07
Rossi 2007		74	0.47	52	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	35	0.26	64	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.59	25	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	15	0.40	44	0.17
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.59	10	0.02	28	0.09	37	0.36	10	0.55	27	0.44
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.63	13	0.01	25	0.09	20	0.51	17	0.51	22	0.51
Schilhawsky 1960		10	0.70	23	0.00	10	0.16	14	0.60	6	0.60	13	0.60
Shebanova 2002		8	0.71	15	0.01	6	0.14	4	0.69	3	0.62	7	0.65
Smith 1975		41	0.59	18	0.01	53	0.06	51	0.06	38	0.19	60	0.11
Sokolov 2002		30	0.62	7	0.02	33	0.13	25	0.48	3	0.60	19	0.54
Sztompka 1959		3	0.74	4	0.03	2	0.21	2	0.76	1	0.75	2	0.75
Tomsic 1995		56	0.54	33	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	12	0.55	45	0.17
Uninsky 1932		23	0.66	66	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.58	4	0.60	16	0.59
Uninsky 1971		14	0.68	27	0.00	15	0.11	10	0.62	4	0.64	9	0.63
Wasowski 1980		29	0.63	38	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.30	13	0.51	33	0.39
Zak 1937		5	0.72	17	0.01	11	0.12	9	0.63	5	0.65	8	0.64
Zak 1951		12	0.70	14	0.01	14	0.10	12	0.61	7	0.59	12	0.60
Random 1		89	-0.08	83	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	57	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.06	67	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.04	88	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.12	80	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).