Horowitz 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.59	4	0.08	3	0.15	2	0.60	48	0.07	14	0.20
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.52	19	0.01	34	0.08	35	0.32	75	0.03	41	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.58	1	0.20	1	0.20	3	0.60	15	0.45	2	0.52
Bacha 2000		67	0.37	79	0.00	67	0.05	65	0.05	87	0.03	60	0.04
Badura 1965		43	0.47	27	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	51	0.06	47	0.07
Barbosa 1983		75	0.33	82	0.00	68	0.06	61	0.06	78	0.04	54	0.05
Biret 1990		40	0.48	43	0.00	42	0.08	40	0.24	82	0.03	46	0.08
Blet 2003		58	0.42	23	0.01	60	0.05	64	0.05	80	0.03	66	0.04
Block 1995		32	0.50	74	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.38	71	0.04	36	0.12
Blumental 1952		59	0.41	28	0.00	40	0.08	43	0.17	74	0.04	45	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		8	0.57	37	0.00	7	0.15	9	0.53	43	0.11	12	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		31	0.50	17	0.01	35	0.09	32	0.36	22	0.45	8	0.40
Bunin 1987		11	0.56	8	0.03	13	0.09	11	0.51	4	0.54	3	0.52
Bunin 1987b		16	0.53	16	0.01	22	0.07	20	0.48	6	0.50	4	0.49
Chiu 1999		65	0.40	66	0.00	63	0.06	60	0.06	85	0.03	61	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.17	70	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		48	0.44	53	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	54	0.05	58	0.05
Csalog 1996		86	0.26	83	0.00	83	0.04	76	0.04	67	0.04	65	0.04
Czerny 1949		25	0.51	69	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.23	73	0.04	42	0.10
Czerny 1990		60	0.41	87	0.00	66	0.05	67	0.05	71	0.04	71	0.04
Duchoud 2007		68	0.37	40	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	67	0.04	68	0.04
Ezaki 2006		45	0.47	46	0.00	52	0.07	51	0.07	86	0.03	49	0.05
Falvay 1989		83	0.30	90	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03
Farrell 1958		77	0.32	84	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.42	31	0.00	47	0.06	55	0.06	58	0.04	55	0.05
Fliere 1977		12	0.55	29	0.00	14	0.09	10	0.51	78	0.04	27	0.14
Fou 1978		29	0.50	25	0.01	36	0.07	36	0.32	79	0.04	38	0.11
Francois 1956		78	0.32	85	0.00	78	0.04	75	0.04	82	0.03	86	0.03
Friedman 1923		26	0.51	77	0.00	24	0.08	26	0.45	30	0.36	10	0.40
Friedman 1923b		28	0.51	11	0.02	20	0.07	23	0.46	32	0.36	7	0.41
Friedman 1930		27	0.51	56	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.46	31	0.37	6	0.41
Garcia 2007		51	0.43	80	0.00	59	0.06	59	0.06	50	0.05	56	0.05
Garcia 2007b		46	0.45	51	0.00	51	0.07	50	0.07	71	0.04	59	0.05
Gierzod 1998		19	0.52	33	0.00	19	0.07	21	0.46	60	0.04	30	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.43	54	0.00	56	0.05	68	0.05	74	0.03	70	0.04
Groot 1988		23	0.52	18	0.01	25	0.08	25	0.45	44	0.09	15	0.20
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.58	12	0.02	5	0.18	4	0.57	58	0.05	22	0.17
Hatto 1993		42	0.48	47	0.00	27	0.09	14	0.50	58	0.05	24	0.16
Hatto 1997		34	0.49	15	0.01	28	0.09	17	0.49	64	0.04	29	0.14
Horowitz 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Indjic 1988		37	0.49	75	0.00	29	0.11	15	0.50	63	0.04	28	0.14
Kapell 1951		52	0.43	30	0.00	62	0.06	54	0.06	83	0.03	63	0.04
Kissin 1993		18	0.53	20	0.01	23	0.07	28	0.45	55	0.06	23	0.16
Kushner 1989		55	0.43	45	0.00	64	0.06	62	0.06	66	0.04	53	0.05
Luisada 1991		15	0.54	21	0.01	17	0.13	7	0.54	51	0.06	17	0.18
Lushtak 2004		62	0.40	57	0.00	61	0.06	56	0.06	85	0.03	69	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		30	0.50	13	0.02	30	0.10	29	0.44	51	0.05	25	0.15
Magaloff 1978		61	0.41	72	0.00	65	0.08	47	0.08	72	0.04	48	0.06
Magin 1975		17	0.53	42	0.00	21	0.08	30	0.42	55	0.04	31	0.13
Michalowski 1933		47	0.44	24	0.01	44	0.08	44	0.15	47	0.08	39	0.11
Milkina 1970		20	0.52	3	0.11	9	0.10	27	0.45	73	0.04	32	0.13
Mohovich 1999		41	0.48	55	0.00	41	0.08	39	0.24	52	0.06	37	0.12
Moravec 1969		71	0.36	59	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	84	0.03	73	0.03
Morozova 2008		36	0.49	36	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.18	67	0.04	44	0.08
Neighaus 1950		21	0.52	39	0.00	15	0.10	22	0.46	40	0.13	13	0.24
Niedzielski 1931		49	0.44	5	0.05	32	0.11	34	0.33	43	0.11	16	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.47	86	0.00	31	0.10	33	0.34	77	0.04	35	0.12
Osinska 1989		39	0.48	58	0.00	46	0.08	48	0.08	79	0.03	51	0.05
Pachmann 1927		79	0.32	65	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	86	0.02	87	0.02
Paderewski 1930		72	0.34	60	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.03	80	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		33	0.49	61	0.00	48	0.07	49	0.07	73	0.03	50	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.34	67	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.03	76	0.03
Poblocka 1999		13	0.55	52	0.00	12	0.11	13	0.50	46	0.06	20	0.17
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.39	44	0.00	69	0.04	77	0.04	77	0.03	78	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		9	0.56	10	0.02	8	0.14	5	0.56	48	0.06	18	0.18
Rangell 2001		74	0.33	68	0.00	70	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.03	84	0.03
Richter 1976		1	0.60	7	0.03	4	0.18	8	0.54	17	0.52	1	0.53
Rosen 1989		56	0.42	76	0.00	49	0.06	57	0.06	72	0.05	57	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		53	0.43	34	0.00	54	0.06	53	0.06	42	0.17	43	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.33	49	0.00	79	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.32	62	0.00	80	0.02	88	0.02	77	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.31	50	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.32	63	0.00	82	0.05	69	0.05	68	0.04	72	0.04
Rossi 2007		85	0.29	71	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.04	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		69	0.37	32	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	87	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.29	26	0.00	74	0.03	84	0.03	69	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		63	0.40	22	0.01	55	0.05	66	0.05	75	0.04	67	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.59	2	0.18	2	0.21	1	0.61	29	0.40	5	0.49
Shebanova 2002		22	0.52	35	0.00	10	0.09	19	0.48	65	0.05	26	0.15
Smith 1975		50	0.43	78	0.00	57	0.06	58	0.06	85	0.03	62	0.04
Sokolov 2002		64	0.40	88	0.00	50	0.08	45	0.08	81	0.03	52	0.05
Sztompka 1959		10	0.56	48	0.00	16	0.10	18	0.48	56	0.06	21	0.17
Tomsic 1995		70	0.36	64	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	77	0.04	64	0.04
Uninsky 1932		6	0.58	9	0.02	11	0.10	12	0.51	38	0.28	11	0.38
Uninsky 1971		7	0.58	14	0.01	6	0.20	6	0.55	32	0.29	9	0.40
Wasowski 1980		14	0.54	6	0.04	18	0.07	16	0.49	58	0.06	19	0.17
Zak 1937		35	0.49	41	0.00	39	0.08	38	0.26	81	0.04	40	0.10
Zak 1951		38	0.48	38	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.27	60	0.05	34	0.12
Random 1		89	-0.10	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	49	0.04	82	0.03
Random 2		88	0.03	73	0.00	88	0.03	85	0.03	4	0.55	33	0.13
Random 3		90	-0.12	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.04	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).