Gornostaeva 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		29	0.55	49	0.00	40	0.05	36	0.16	63	0.05	54	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		2	0.67	3	0.09	3	0.16	2	0.72	9	0.57	1	0.64
Ashkenazy 1981		58	0.50	37	0.00	48	0.04	51	0.04	47	0.07	70	0.05
Bacha 2000		75	0.45	28	0.00	60	0.03	73	0.03	62	0.04	85	0.03
Badura 1965		63	0.49	77	0.00	65	0.03	86	0.03	48	0.08	68	0.05
Barbosa 1983		68	0.48	87	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.15	33	0.26	26	0.20
Biret 1990		41	0.53	56	0.00	26	0.09	28	0.31	80	0.03	51	0.10
Blet 2003		52	0.51	61	0.00	72	0.03	68	0.03	55	0.05	79	0.04
Block 1995		38	0.53	30	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.31	20	0.36	17	0.33
Blumental 1952		65	0.48	48	0.00	34	0.06	38	0.16	48	0.06	50	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.67	8	0.05	5	0.14	4	0.71	19	0.51	3	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.53	73	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	46	0.09	67	0.05
Bunin 1987		81	0.43	63	0.00	57	0.03	65	0.03	32	0.30	55	0.09
Bunin 1987b		84	0.42	43	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	31	0.30	53	0.09
Chiu 1999		79	0.44	76	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	56	0.05	72	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.33	42	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	49	0.05	83	0.04
Cortot 1951		73	0.46	62	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	60	0.05	84	0.04
Csalog 1996		78	0.44	71	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	37	0.15	63	0.07
Czerny 1949		17	0.60	27	0.00	29	0.10	24	0.33	44	0.15	25	0.22
Czerny 1990		15	0.61	32	0.00	20	0.08	13	0.52	55	0.06	28	0.18
Duchoud 2007		82	0.43	35	0.00	45	0.04	54	0.04	27	0.26	48	0.10
Ezaki 2006		18	0.59	82	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.33	56	0.05	38	0.13
Falvay 1989		26	0.57	4	0.09	13	0.10	29	0.29	13	0.50	11	0.38
Farrell 1958		67	0.48	78	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	60	0.06	75	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		33	0.54	69	0.00	70	0.05	46	0.05	22	0.39	36	0.14
Fliere 1977		9	0.65	5	0.08	11	0.19	8	0.58	41	0.17	18	0.31
Fou 1978		23	0.58	13	0.01	17	0.09	18	0.43	51	0.05	31	0.15
Francois 1956		32	0.54	29	0.00	51	0.04	48	0.04	30	0.35	43	0.12
Friedman 1923		53	0.51	55	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	36	0.27	56	0.09
Friedman 1923b		54	0.51	41	0.00	58	0.03	71	0.03	38	0.22	62	0.08
Friedman 1930		28	0.56	72	0.00	46	0.04	55	0.04	22	0.46	35	0.14
Garcia 2007		40	0.53	39	0.00	66	0.03	83	0.03	31	0.31	49	0.10
Garcia 2007b		22	0.58	15	0.01	24	0.16	22	0.35	24	0.39	12	0.37
Gierzod 1998		1	0.68	2	0.15	2	0.20	1	0.74	26	0.44	5	0.57
Gornostaeva 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Groot 1988		80	0.44	67	0.00	31	0.09	32	0.21	45	0.07	42	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.60	33	0.00	21	0.09	26	0.32	47	0.06	37	0.14
Hatto 1993		74	0.46	75	0.00	55	0.03	62	0.03	73	0.04	90	0.03
Hatto 1997		72	0.47	86	0.00	56	0.03	60	0.03	78	0.04	87	0.03
Horowitz 1949		83	0.43	64	0.00	84	0.03	74	0.03	68	0.05	76	0.04
Indjic 1988		69	0.47	79	0.00	54	0.03	58	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.03
Kapell 1951		21	0.58	22	0.00	23	0.11	15	0.51	41	0.15	19	0.28
Kissin 1993		25	0.57	54	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.21	52	0.06	45	0.11
Kushner 1989		12	0.62	20	0.01	14	0.09	12	0.56	38	0.23	15	0.36
Luisada 1991		19	0.59	10	0.02	15	0.12	10	0.57	23	0.33	10	0.43
Lushtak 2004		59	0.50	40	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	54	0.05	69	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		10	0.64	6	0.07	4	0.14	16	0.49	12	0.47	9	0.48
Magaloff 1978		20	0.58	46	0.00	30	0.08	23	0.35	15	0.38	14	0.36
Magin 1975		3	0.67	1	0.17	1	0.17	3	0.71	6	0.56	2	0.63
Michalowski 1933		44	0.53	90	0.00	69	0.05	47	0.05	25	0.30	40	0.12
Milkina 1970		7	0.65	9	0.03	7	0.15	6	0.60	22	0.48	7	0.54
Mohovich 1999		30	0.55	44	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.24	45	0.11	30	0.16
Moravec 1969		60	0.50	16	0.01	74	0.03	81	0.03	33	0.22	57	0.08
Morozova 2008		64	0.48	31	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	62	0.05	81	0.04
Neighaus 1950		24	0.57	59	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.13	70	0.04	65	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.54	23	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.16	36	0.20	27	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.54	26	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	48	0.06	61	0.08
Osinska 1989		5	0.66	7	0.05	10	0.16	11	0.56	36	0.23	13	0.36
Pachmann 1927		42	0.53	51	0.00	82	0.03	67	0.03	9	0.49	39	0.12
Paderewski 1930		76	0.45	68	0.00	80	0.03	66	0.03	34	0.21	60	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.52	58	0.00	49	0.04	50	0.04	37	0.17	58	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		86	0.39	83	0.00	87	0.04	52	0.04	60	0.05	73	0.04
Poblocka 1999		27	0.56	47	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.15	61	0.05	52	0.09
Rabcewiczowa 1932		31	0.54	17	0.01	25	0.09	19	0.41	39	0.16	21	0.26
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.53	80	0.00	36	0.05	37	0.16	71	0.04	59	0.08
Rangell 2001		51	0.52	57	0.00	33	0.06	34	0.17	19	0.39	22	0.26
Richter 1976		77	0.44	88	0.00	83	0.03	61	0.03	53	0.05	77	0.04
Rosen 1989		8	0.65	18	0.01	6	0.17	7	0.59	13	0.49	8	0.54
Rosenthal 1930		39	0.53	65	0.00	67	0.03	80	0.03	23	0.43	46	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		48	0.53	84	0.00	68	0.04	56	0.04	14	0.52	34	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		49	0.53	81	0.00	47	0.04	49	0.04	10	0.59	33	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		45	0.53	34	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.09	11	0.59	24	0.23
Rosenthal 1931d		56	0.50	45	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	16	0.51	41	0.12
Rossi 2007		61	0.49	24	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	29	0.32	44	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		66	0.48	50	0.00	59	0.03	76	0.03	47	0.06	74	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		85	0.41	52	0.00	53	0.03	59	0.03	45	0.07	71	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		57	0.50	38	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.14	47	0.07	47	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		71	0.47	74	0.00	79	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.05	80	0.04
Shebanova 2002		14	0.61	14	0.01	12	0.12	14	0.52	54	0.05	29	0.16
Smith 1975		6	0.66	25	0.00	8	0.19	5	0.61	6	0.55	4	0.58
Sokolov 2002		43	0.53	11	0.02	22	0.09	21	0.37	23	0.32	16	0.34
Sztompka 1959		13	0.62	12	0.01	19	0.08	17	0.44	57	0.05	32	0.15
Tomsic 1995		70	0.47	66	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	41	0.14	66	0.06
Uninsky 1932		55	0.51	36	0.00	61	0.03	70	0.03	53	0.05	82	0.04
Uninsky 1971		62	0.49	60	0.00	78	0.03	69	0.03	68	0.05	78	0.04
Wasowski 1980		11	0.62	19	0.01	9	0.15	9	0.57	8	0.56	6	0.56
Zak 1937		34	0.54	53	0.00	18	0.08	30	0.29	37	0.18	23	0.23
Zak 1951		35	0.54	21	0.01	16	0.11	20	0.37	35	0.19	20	0.27
Random 1		88	-0.05	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	24	0.25	64	0.07
Random 2		90	-0.14	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	42	0.08	88	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.07	70	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	68	0.04	89	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).