Friedman 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.62	37	0.00	11	0.14	13	0.52	39	0.19	15	0.31
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.59	74	0.00	30	0.10	35	0.29	56	0.04	40	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		30	0.56	29	0.00	20	0.18	23	0.45	30	0.26	14	0.34
Bacha 2000		67	0.41	65	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	85	0.03	76	0.03
Badura 1965		26	0.57	9	0.01	29	0.09	26	0.44	23	0.38	11	0.41
Barbosa 1983		60	0.44	83	0.00	59	0.06	47	0.06	72	0.04	50	0.05
Biret 1990		43	0.50	39	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.18	60	0.04	47	0.08
Blet 2003		68	0.41	77	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	71	0.03	83	0.03
Block 1995		63	0.43	86	0.00	52	0.05	62	0.05	45	0.07	48	0.06
Blumental 1952		35	0.52	48	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.22	59	0.04	45	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.59	33	0.00	21	0.09	19	0.48	46	0.08	21	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		51	0.47	30	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	54	0.05	59	0.04
Bunin 1987		74	0.38	55	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	33	0.28	26	0.16
Bunin 1987b		77	0.36	63	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	33	0.28	32	0.14
Chiu 1999		25	0.58	14	0.00	32	0.09	36	0.28	45	0.07	30	0.14
Cohen 1997		84	0.30	66	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.03	90	0.02
Cortot 1951		80	0.34	78	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		86	0.28	20	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03
Czerny 1949		14	0.60	22	0.00	15	0.10	12	0.53	43	0.17	16	0.30
Czerny 1990		6	0.63	16	0.00	14	0.10	9	0.54	53	0.06	24	0.18
Duchoud 2007		75	0.37	19	0.00	69	0.04	76	0.04	47	0.06	52	0.05
Ezaki 2006		29	0.56	84	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.30	57	0.05	37	0.12
Falvay 1989		71	0.39	57	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	77	0.03
Farrell 1958		48	0.48	75	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	69	0.04	65	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.48	12	0.00	54	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.07	51	0.05
Fliere 1977		10	0.62	79	0.00	22	0.09	25	0.44	56	0.05	28	0.15
Fou 1978		59	0.45	53	0.00	63	0.04	75	0.04	77	0.04	66	0.04
Francois 1956		55	0.46	50	0.00	55	0.05	63	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.05
Friedman 1923		2	0.84	2	0.22	2	0.83	1	0.90	2	0.87	2	0.88
Friedman 1923b		1	0.84	1	0.65	1	0.64	2	0.89	2	0.87	1	0.88
Friedman 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007		56	0.46	31	0.00	68	0.04	73	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04
Garcia 2007b		41	0.51	21	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.24	74	0.04	43	0.10
Gierzod 1998		13	0.60	42	0.00	9	0.21	11	0.53	50	0.06	23	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.56	67	0.00	31	0.10	22	0.46	55	0.04	33	0.14
Groot 1988		65	0.42	36	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	57	0.05	55	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.63	3	0.01	13	0.10	10	0.53	60	0.05	27	0.16
Hatto 1993		5	0.66	60	0.00	3	0.30	3	0.65	13	0.43	4	0.53
Hatto 1997		4	0.66	18	0.00	5	0.29	6	0.63	14	0.43	6	0.52
Horowitz 1949		39	0.51	76	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.37	24	0.46	10	0.41
Indjic 1988		3	0.66	25	0.00	4	0.25	5	0.64	14	0.45	3	0.54
Kapell 1951		64	0.43	58	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	82	0.03	68	0.04
Kissin 1993		44	0.50	87	0.00	43	0.09	38	0.22	60	0.05	41	0.10
Kushner 1989		38	0.51	8	0.01	51	0.06	53	0.06	81	0.03	67	0.04
Luisada 1991		21	0.58	32	0.00	18	0.10	21	0.46	39	0.16	18	0.27
Lushtak 2004		40	0.51	43	0.00	58	0.06	51	0.06	80	0.03	72	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.48	59	0.00	37	0.07	44	0.14	48	0.05	46	0.08
Magaloff 1978		58	0.46	68	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.04	62	0.04
Magin 1975		19	0.59	4	0.01	10	0.14	16	0.51	37	0.23	13	0.34
Michalowski 1933		45	0.50	51	0.00	44	0.11	41	0.22	26	0.28	19	0.25
Milkina 1970		42	0.51	5	0.01	38	0.08	39	0.22	50	0.06	39	0.11
Mohovich 1999		57	0.46	23	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	78	0.04	54	0.05
Moravec 1969		72	0.38	61	0.00	75	0.05	61	0.05	66	0.04	57	0.04
Morozova 2008		34	0.52	80	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.20	54	0.05	42	0.10
Neighaus 1950		12	0.61	15	0.00	19	0.13	17	0.51	22	0.37	9	0.43
Niedzielski 1931		15	0.60	6	0.01	8	0.16	15	0.52	9	0.47	7	0.49
Ohlsson 1999		33	0.55	26	0.00	27	0.08	32	0.31	55	0.05	38	0.12
Osinska 1989		24	0.58	11	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.42	70	0.04	34	0.13
Pachmann 1927		66	0.42	28	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	74	0.03	87	0.02
Paderewski 1930		69	0.40	45	0.00	71	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.03	80	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.49	49	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	76	0.03	58	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		83	0.30	44	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.04	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		54	0.46	69	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	53	0.05	49	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		53	0.47	27	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	85	0.03	64	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		23	0.58	52	0.00	25	0.08	29	0.40	47	0.06	29	0.15
Rangell 2001		85	0.28	81	0.00	82	0.04	79	0.04	72	0.04	73	0.04
Richter 1976		52	0.47	34	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	44	0.14	44	0.09
Rosen 1989		31	0.56	17	0.00	24	0.12	18	0.49	45	0.08	20	0.20
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.39	70	0.00	73	0.06	54	0.06	70	0.03	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.35	71	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	67	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.36	46	0.00	77	0.04	78	0.04	60	0.05	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.36	64	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.04	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.33	82	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.04	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		61	0.44	10	0.00	74	0.05	65	0.05	63	0.04	61	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		62	0.44	35	0.00	65	0.05	59	0.05	83	0.03	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.32	62	0.00	67	0.04	77	0.04	84	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.51	54	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	77	0.04	69	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.56	41	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.41	47	0.07	25	0.17
Shebanova 2002		16	0.59	56	0.00	12	0.12	8	0.55	49	0.06	22	0.18
Smith 1975		32	0.55	13	0.00	33	0.12	30	0.38	57	0.05	31	0.14
Sokolov 2002		73	0.38	88	0.00	66	0.05	64	0.05	78	0.03	60	0.04
Sztompka 1959		22	0.58	40	0.00	23	0.13	24	0.45	69	0.04	35	0.13
Tomsic 1995		87	0.25	72	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	80	0.03	79	0.03
Uninsky 1932		46	0.50	89	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.30	49	0.06	36	0.13
Uninsky 1971		36	0.52	73	0.00	16	0.13	20	0.48	43	0.16	17	0.28
Wasowski 1980		18	0.59	38	0.00	17	0.12	14	0.52	38	0.22	12	0.34
Zak 1937		8	0.62	24	0.00	7	0.26	7	0.62	25	0.39	8	0.49
Zak 1951		9	0.62	7	0.01	6	0.31	4	0.65	22	0.41	5	0.52
Random 1		90	-0.16	47	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	42	0.11	53	0.05
Random 2		88	-0.09	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.12	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	79	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).