Czerny 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		21	0.66	68	0.00	31	0.09	26	0.39	25	0.42	30	0.40
Anderszewski 2003		8	0.71	9	0.02	10	0.18	10	0.62	4	0.64	10	0.63
Ashkenazy 1981		61	0.53	45	0.00	69	0.04	75	0.04	65	0.04	85	0.04
Bacha 2000		63	0.52	29	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	10	0.42	60	0.14
Badura 1965		60	0.54	64	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	42	0.19	71	0.09
Barbosa 1983		54	0.58	19	0.00	24	0.07	35	0.23	5	0.60	32	0.37
Biret 1990		32	0.63	58	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.43	12	0.46	20	0.44
Blet 2003		64	0.52	65	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	38	0.15	72	0.08
Block 1995		65	0.52	37	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	37	0.17	73	0.08
Blumental 1952		13	0.69	3	0.08	5	0.23	3	0.73	1	0.71	2	0.72
Boshniakovich 1969		33	0.63	61	0.00	28	0.07	34	0.27	36	0.27	39	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.57	59	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	16	0.53	55	0.16
Bunin 1987		85	0.38	69	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.04	88	0.03
Bunin 1987b		87	0.37	49	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	58	0.04	86	0.03
Chiu 1999		52	0.59	39	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	15	0.35	62	0.13
Cohen 1997		83	0.41	81	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	34	0.19	74	0.08
Cortot 1951		71	0.49	63	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	28	0.39	67	0.11
Csalog 1996		72	0.49	78	0.00	61	0.04	66	0.04	18	0.39	65	0.12
Czerny 1949		1	0.79	1	0.47	1	0.47	1	0.88	1	0.88	1	0.88
Czerny 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Duchoud 2007		86	0.37	87	0.00	84	0.03	87	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.03
Ezaki 2006		6	0.72	14	0.01	8	0.17	9	0.64	3	0.72	7	0.68
Falvay 1989		22	0.66	11	0.01	35	0.12	33	0.31	5	0.60	21	0.43
Farrell 1958		25	0.65	12	0.01	15	0.11	13	0.53	4	0.64	13	0.58
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.55	43	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	31	0.34	69	0.10
Fliere 1977		12	0.69	53	0.00	19	0.08	14	0.50	31	0.23	33	0.34
Fou 1978		30	0.63	25	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.34	19	0.44	31	0.39
Francois 1956		47	0.60	47	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	6	0.60	47	0.19
Friedman 1923		41	0.61	50	0.00	53	0.07	50	0.07	12	0.52	48	0.19
Friedman 1923b		42	0.61	66	0.00	49	0.06	56	0.06	14	0.53	50	0.18
Friedman 1930		31	0.63	51	0.00	50	0.06	53	0.06	9	0.54	49	0.18
Garcia 2007		73	0.49	88	0.00	77	0.04	77	0.04	52	0.05	83	0.04
Garcia 2007b		66	0.51	89	0.00	62	0.05	58	0.05	51	0.05	79	0.05
Gierzod 1998		2	0.75	2	0.14	2	0.30	2	0.76	9	0.63	6	0.69
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.61	41	0.00	48	0.06	55	0.06	13	0.52	51	0.18
Groot 1988		69	0.51	10	0.02	39	0.06	44	0.13	27	0.25	52	0.18
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.73	4	0.07	4	0.25	4	0.73	4	0.71	3	0.72
Hatto 1993		18	0.66	72	0.00	21	0.09	18	0.47	18	0.38	26	0.42
Hatto 1997		16	0.67	73	0.00	27	0.08	21	0.44	22	0.36	29	0.40
Horowitz 1949		84	0.41	70	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.05	81	0.04
Indjic 1988		15	0.67	48	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.46	18	0.39	25	0.42
Kapell 1951		20	0.66	17	0.00	12	0.10	11	0.60	7	0.49	14	0.54
Kissin 1993		5	0.72	18	0.00	6	0.14	8	0.67	6	0.67	8	0.67
Kushner 1989		9	0.71	54	0.00	13	0.12	12	0.59	12	0.59	12	0.59
Luisada 1991		51	0.59	82	0.00	55	0.07	48	0.07	58	0.05	76	0.06
Lushtak 2004		29	0.63	7	0.02	41	0.06	41	0.16	24	0.38	41	0.25
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.60	32	0.00	36	0.08	37	0.21	7	0.56	34	0.34
Magaloff 1978		37	0.61	26	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.19	3	0.53	36	0.32
Magin 1975		34	0.63	30	0.00	29	0.07	22	0.44	18	0.46	19	0.45
Michalowski 1933		81	0.45	83	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	50	0.07	78	0.05
Milkina 1970		7	0.71	5	0.03	7	0.17	6	0.72	6	0.67	5	0.69
Mohovich 1999		55	0.58	71	0.00	51	0.06	52	0.06	37	0.30	63	0.13
Moravec 1969		23	0.65	36	0.00	14	0.12	16	0.48	2	0.74	11	0.60
Morozova 2008		36	0.61	35	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.17	21	0.41	40	0.26
Neighaus 1950		46	0.60	40	0.00	54	0.06	54	0.06	32	0.24	66	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.61	55	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	12	0.46	45	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.60	20	0.00	52	0.07	49	0.07	39	0.14	68	0.10
Osinska 1989		3	0.74	6	0.03	3	0.23	5	0.73	6	0.65	4	0.69
Pachmann 1927		76	0.49	44	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	11	0.47	61	0.14
Paderewski 1930		74	0.49	74	0.00	73	0.05	64	0.05	15	0.49	56	0.16
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.54	90	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	54	0.05	80	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.45	75	0.00	67	0.03	83	0.03	34	0.28	70	0.09
Poblocka 1999		27	0.64	42	0.00	34	0.12	24	0.41	23	0.44	24	0.42
Rabcewiczowa 1932		48	0.60	16	0.01	11	0.10	29	0.37	9	0.49	22	0.43
Rachmaninoff 1923		38	0.61	31	0.00	26	0.07	30	0.36	11	0.44	27	0.40
Rangell 2001		77	0.49	27	0.00	59	0.05	63	0.05	9	0.53	57	0.16
Richter 1976		80	0.47	62	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	47	0.06	82	0.04
Rosen 1989		35	0.62	34	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.15	26	0.32	43	0.22
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.51	67	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	13	0.53	59	0.15
Rosenthal 1931		70	0.50	84	0.00	71	0.04	68	0.04	11	0.55	58	0.15
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.49	76	0.00	72	0.05	61	0.05	12	0.55	54	0.17
Rosenthal 1931c		62	0.53	56	0.00	56	0.07	47	0.07	9	0.59	44	0.20
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.48	79	0.00	74	0.05	62	0.05	13	0.56	53	0.17
Rossi 2007		57	0.56	60	0.00	65	0.04	73	0.04	18	0.39	64	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.61	46	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.19	10	0.42	38	0.28
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.60	13	0.01	17	0.08	27	0.39	17	0.47	23	0.43
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.70	8	0.02	16	0.10	17	0.47	9	0.61	15	0.54
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.64	28	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.13	25	0.43	42	0.24
Shebanova 2002		19	0.66	21	0.00	33	0.11	28	0.38	28	0.30	35	0.34
Smith 1975		24	0.65	22	0.00	32	0.08	25	0.41	4	0.56	17	0.48
Sokolov 2002		68	0.51	77	0.00	68	0.04	65	0.04	46	0.06	77	0.05
Sztompka 1959		11	0.70	24	0.00	9	0.14	7	0.69	7	0.63	9	0.66
Tomsic 1995		78	0.48	57	0.00	81	0.04	70	0.04	42	0.13	75	0.07
Uninsky 1932		53	0.58	38	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	18	0.47	46	0.19
Uninsky 1971		40	0.61	15	0.01	23	0.07	32	0.33	23	0.48	28	0.40
Wasowski 1980		26	0.64	52	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.22	21	0.43	37	0.31
Zak 1937		14	0.68	23	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.49	11	0.53	16	0.51
Zak 1951		17	0.67	33	0.00	20	0.09	19	0.47	15	0.47	18	0.47
Random 1		90	-0.10	85	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	29	0.18	84	0.04
Random 2		88	-0.06	80	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.10	86	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	56	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).