Cortot 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.48	57	0.00	33	0.07	35	0.25	84	0.03	39	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		28	0.48	43	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.30	82	0.03	38	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		39	0.45	13	0.01	28	0.09	30	0.33	62	0.04	30	0.11
Bacha 2000		37	0.45	32	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.22	54	0.05	32	0.10
Badura 1965		72	0.35	66	0.00	78	0.05	52	0.05	81	0.03	67	0.04
Barbosa 1983		49	0.43	28	0.00	51	0.04	65	0.04	52	0.05	63	0.04
Biret 1990		16	0.51	21	0.00	13	0.10	18	0.48	59	0.04	23	0.14
Blet 2003		62	0.40	79	0.00	75	0.05	62	0.05	64	0.04	64	0.04
Block 1995		46	0.43	44	0.00	50	0.04	66	0.04	74	0.04	68	0.04
Blumental 1952		20	0.49	7	0.02	17	0.11	10	0.57	71	0.04	17	0.15
Boshniakovich 1969		22	0.49	36	0.00	23	0.08	26	0.40	73	0.04	27	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.41	71	0.00	68	0.03	72	0.03	57	0.05	52	0.04
Bunin 1987		73	0.35	70	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	54	0.05	71	0.04
Bunin 1987b		78	0.33	72	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	68	0.04	59	0.04
Chiu 1999		69	0.37	76	0.00	64	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03
Cohen 1997		83	0.30	61	0.00	79	0.05	57	0.05	76	0.03	70	0.04
Cortot 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Csalog 1996		81	0.31	83	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.03	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		2	0.59	6	0.05	4	0.19	1	0.72	39	0.25	2	0.42
Czerny 1990		21	0.49	73	0.00	31	0.12	28	0.39	84	0.03	31	0.11
Duchoud 2007		80	0.33	64	0.00	63	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03
Ezaki 2006		18	0.50	17	0.00	32	0.07	37	0.22	70	0.04	34	0.09
Falvay 1989		84	0.30	84	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.03
Farrell 1958		10	0.53	11	0.01	9	0.20	8	0.59	59	0.06	11	0.19
Ferenczy 1958		55	0.41	37	0.00	60	0.06	47	0.06	64	0.03	65	0.04
Fliere 1977		8	0.53	74	0.00	16	0.11	11	0.56	62	0.04	15	0.15
Fou 1978		23	0.49	39	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.42	80	0.04	26	0.13
Francois 1956		71	0.36	80	0.00	77	0.05	61	0.05	77	0.03	75	0.04
Friedman 1923		63	0.40	89	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	78	0.04	76	0.04
Friedman 1923b		64	0.39	81	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.03
Friedman 1930		75	0.34	46	0.00	85	0.03	73	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		26	0.49	85	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.41	42	0.14	8	0.24
Garcia 2007b		34	0.46	33	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.46	43	0.10	10	0.21
Gierzod 1998		41	0.45	86	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	70	0.04	66	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.46	20	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	87	0.03	72	0.04
Groot 1988		47	0.43	38	0.00	30	0.09	31	0.31	61	0.05	29	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.57	10	0.01	7	0.29	3	0.69	54	0.05	13	0.19
Hatto 1993		32	0.47	47	0.00	20	0.18	13	0.52	70	0.04	25	0.14
Hatto 1997		30	0.48	58	0.00	18	0.09	14	0.52	74	0.04	21	0.14
Horowitz 1949		44	0.44	34	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	52	0.06	48	0.05
Indjic 1988		31	0.48	75	0.00	19	0.11	12	0.52	71	0.04	20	0.14
Kapell 1951		13	0.52	5	0.07	6	0.25	6	0.61	49	0.06	12	0.19
Kissin 1993		17	0.50	29	0.00	24	0.10	20	0.47	82	0.03	28	0.12
Kushner 1989		52	0.42	14	0.01	58	0.06	46	0.06	74	0.03	58	0.04
Luisada 1991		60	0.41	15	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	77	0.03	77	0.03
Lushtak 2004		40	0.45	27	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.13	65	0.05	42	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.56	2	0.21	2	0.21	9	0.59	27	0.24	5	0.38
Magaloff 1978		35	0.46	48	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.18	63	0.04	40	0.08
Magin 1975		48	0.43	67	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.04	56	0.04
Michalowski 1933		68	0.38	55	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.04	80	0.03
Milkina 1970		29	0.48	49	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.27	75	0.04	33	0.10
Mohovich 1999		67	0.38	65	0.00	59	0.06	45	0.06	84	0.03	69	0.04
Moravec 1969		54	0.42	51	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	72	0.03	47	0.05
Morozova 2008		38	0.45	40	0.00	48	0.05	59	0.05	55	0.05	49	0.05
Neighaus 1950		25	0.49	30	0.00	21	0.08	27	0.39	52	0.05	24	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		24	0.49	12	0.01	39	0.09	34	0.26	78	0.03	36	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		56	0.41	59	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	85	0.03	62	0.04
Osinska 1989		14	0.51	62	0.00	14	0.10	15	0.50	58	0.06	14	0.17
Pachmann 1927		87	0.26	56	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02
Paderewski 1930		57	0.41	18	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.16	37	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.40	68	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	82	0.03	51	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		85	0.29	23	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.05	55	0.04
Poblocka 1999		9	0.53	4	0.12	5	0.17	7	0.60	37	0.23	6	0.37
Rabcewiczowa 1932		53	0.42	41	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	79	0.03	57	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		11	0.52	22	0.00	12	0.11	21	0.47	61	0.04	19	0.14
Rangell 2001		45	0.44	19	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.33	36	0.27	7	0.30
Richter 1976		19	0.50	9	0.01	11	0.13	19	0.47	34	0.35	3	0.41
Rosen 1989		70	0.37	77	0.00	76	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		59	0.41	52	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	48	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.33	82	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	80	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.31	31	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.34	90	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.33	50	0.00	82	0.03	75	0.03	49	0.05	73	0.04
Rossi 2007		66	0.38	42	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.10	78	0.04	46	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.45	45	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.25	75	0.03	35	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		74	0.35	87	0.00	62	0.05	64	0.05	77	0.03	74	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.45	63	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.16	80	0.04	41	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.58	3	0.14	3	0.29	2	0.71	31	0.38	1	0.52
Shebanova 2002		15	0.51	60	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.44	62	0.05	16	0.15
Smith 1975		50	0.43	53	0.00	54	0.05	63	0.05	82	0.03	54	0.04
Sokolov 2002		65	0.38	35	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.03	53	0.04
Sztompka 1959		1	0.59	1	0.22	1	0.22	4	0.69	38	0.22	4	0.39
Tomsic 1995		86	0.28	24	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.05	61	0.04
Uninsky 1932		7	0.54	8	0.01	10	0.22	16	0.49	59	0.04	22	0.14
Uninsky 1971		6	0.55	16	0.00	8	0.24	5	0.63	47	0.07	9	0.21
Wasowski 1980		12	0.52	26	0.00	15	0.10	17	0.49	79	0.04	18	0.14
Zak 1937		43	0.44	69	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.11	62	0.05	44	0.07
Zak 1951		51	0.42	88	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	78	0.04	60	0.04
Random 1		90	0.00	78	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	1	0.57	43	0.08
Random 2		88	0.01	54	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	21	0.29	50	0.05
Random 3		89	0.00	25	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	3	0.56	45	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).