Bunin 1987b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		39	0.41	30	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.25	75	0.03	38	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.44	31	0.00	26	0.12	23	0.39	61	0.04	31	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.46	32	0.00	24	0.13	13	0.47	49	0.07	11	0.18
Bacha 2000		61	0.34	6	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	80	0.03	51	0.04
Badura 1965		14	0.47	33	0.00	5	0.15	10	0.48	27	0.36	5	0.42
Barbosa 1983		53	0.36	34	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.06	48	0.05
Biret 1990		73	0.32	35	0.00	68	0.05	53	0.05	69	0.04	70	0.04
Blet 2003		59	0.35	36	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.03	84	0.03
Block 1995		58	0.35	13	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.04	64	0.04
Blumental 1952		65	0.33	37	0.00	61	0.04	74	0.04	80	0.04	66	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		7	0.53	14	0.00	7	0.19	5	0.53	42	0.11	9	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.29	38	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	75	0.03
Bunin 1987		1	0.99	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Bunin 1987b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Chiu 1999		55	0.35	39	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.13	68	0.04	44	0.07
Cohen 1997		86	0.20	8	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04
Cortot 1951		66	0.33	40	0.00	54	0.04	68	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.04
Csalog 1996		57	0.35	15	0.00	56	0.04	71	0.04	71	0.04	62	0.04
Czerny 1949		2	0.56	41	0.00	4	0.23	3	0.55	36	0.29	6	0.40
Czerny 1990		48	0.37	42	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	86	0.03	87	0.03
Duchoud 2007		51	0.36	43	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.16	45	0.06	35	0.10
Ezaki 2006		34	0.43	7	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.26	82	0.03	37	0.09
Falvay 1989		74	0.31	44	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	77	0.03
Farrell 1958		79	0.29	45	0.00	77	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.04	81	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		33	0.43	46	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.17	55	0.04	43	0.08
Fliere 1977		10	0.49	47	0.00	15	0.09	12	0.48	70	0.04	18	0.14
Fou 1978		63	0.34	48	0.00	72	0.04	57	0.04	75	0.04	57	0.04
Francois 1956		60	0.35	16	0.00	69	0.05	50	0.05	81	0.03	73	0.04
Friedman 1923		71	0.32	49	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	59	0.05	50	0.05
Friedman 1923b		68	0.33	50	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	69	0.04	45	0.07
Friedman 1930		50	0.36	17	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.28	46	0.07	22	0.14
Garcia 2007		46	0.38	51	0.00	58	0.03	76	0.03	73	0.04	86	0.03
Garcia 2007b		38	0.42	9	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.16	53	0.05	40	0.09
Gierzod 1998		15	0.46	52	0.00	27	0.08	28	0.37	85	0.03	33	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.42	53	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.30	72	0.03	39	0.09
Groot 1988		27	0.43	3	0.00	10	0.08	30	0.33	46	0.07	16	0.15
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.46	54	0.00	20	0.08	14	0.46	71	0.04	25	0.14
Hatto 1993		28	0.43	18	0.00	30	0.17	21	0.40	50	0.06	17	0.15
Hatto 1997		31	0.43	55	0.00	29	0.12	24	0.39	58	0.05	23	0.14
Horowitz 1949		6	0.53	56	0.00	8	0.12	6	0.50	20	0.48	3	0.49
Indjic 1988		29	0.43	19	0.00	28	0.09	22	0.40	68	0.04	27	0.13
Kapell 1951		8	0.52	20	0.00	13	0.07	15	0.46	66	0.04	20	0.14
Kissin 1993		40	0.40	57	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	81	0.03	61	0.04
Kushner 1989		32	0.43	58	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.19	80	0.03	42	0.08
Luisada 1991		41	0.40	59	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	80	0.03	52	0.04
Lushtak 2004		23	0.45	21	0.00	23	0.10	29	0.35	63	0.05	28	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.46	22	0.00	11	0.08	17	0.45	49	0.05	13	0.15
Magaloff 1978		69	0.33	60	0.00	70	0.05	56	0.05	68	0.04	54	0.04
Magin 1975		17	0.46	4	0.00	12	0.09	18	0.43	70	0.04	26	0.13
Michalowski 1933		45	0.39	61	0.00	21	0.08	26	0.38	33	0.25	7	0.31
Milkina 1970		44	0.39	11	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	85	0.03	82	0.03
Mohovich 1999		47	0.38	23	0.00	53	0.04	65	0.04	77	0.04	67	0.04
Moravec 1969		80	0.28	62	0.00	71	0.04	61	0.04	73	0.03	74	0.03
Morozova 2008		26	0.43	63	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.25	64	0.04	34	0.10
Neighaus 1950		16	0.46	64	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.40	49	0.05	24	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		54	0.35	65	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	82	0.03	55	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.45	66	0.00	9	0.10	8	0.50	68	0.04	21	0.14
Osinska 1989		37	0.42	24	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	80	0.03	53	0.04
Pachmann 1927		49	0.37	67	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	48	0.06	47	0.05
Paderewski 1930		64	0.34	10	0.00	67	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.04	59	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.43	68	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.23	48	0.06	29	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.27	69	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03
Poblocka 1999		13	0.48	70	0.00	17	0.07	19	0.41	56	0.05	19	0.14
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.36	71	0.00	57	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.40	72	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.29	79	0.04	32	0.11
Rangell 2001		70	0.33	73	0.00	52	0.04	63	0.04	70	0.04	69	0.04
Richter 1976		4	0.54	74	0.00	3	0.24	4	0.53	15	0.53	2	0.53
Rosen 1989		62	0.34	75	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	76	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.35	76	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.23	25	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.25	26	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		75	0.30	77	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.23	2	0.00	86	0.04	75	0.04	84	0.02	88	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.17	27	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.04	76	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		67	0.33	28	0.00	78	0.03	86	0.03	66	0.04	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		76	0.29	78	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	90	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		81	0.28	79	0.00	82	0.04	64	0.04	86	0.03	85	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.54	80	0.00	2	0.28	2	0.57	28	0.41	4	0.48
Shebanova 2002		12	0.48	5	0.00	16	0.10	11	0.48	63	0.05	15	0.15
Smith 1975		78	0.29	81	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	67	0.04	78	0.03
Sokolov 2002		36	0.42	82	0.00	25	0.11	27	0.38	44	0.08	12	0.17
Sztompka 1959		43	0.39	83	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	82	0.03	60	0.04
Tomsic 1995		72	0.32	12	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	61	0.06	58	0.04
Uninsky 1932		21	0.45	84	0.00	19	0.06	25	0.39	50	0.06	14	0.15
Uninsky 1971		5	0.53	85	0.00	6	0.20	7	0.50	41	0.16	8	0.28
Wasowski 1980		25	0.44	86	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.23	86	0.03	41	0.08
Zak 1937		11	0.49	87	0.00	18	0.08	16	0.45	47	0.08	10	0.19
Zak 1951		9	0.50	88	0.00	14	0.08	9	0.48	84	0.03	30	0.12
Random 1		90	-0.02	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	9	0.46	36	0.10
Random 2		89	-0.01	29	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	20	0.30	49	0.05
Random 3		88	-0.01	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	11	0.33	46	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).