Bunin 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		37	0.42	19	0.00	39	0.06	34	0.23	88	0.02	44	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		22	0.46	20	0.00	26	0.13	24	0.39	64	0.04	29	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		15	0.48	21	0.00	16	0.07	8	0.50	45	0.07	11	0.19
Bacha 2000		62	0.35	45	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.03	67	0.03
Badura 1965		17	0.47	8	0.00	5	0.14	12	0.48	28	0.36	6	0.42
Barbosa 1983		54	0.37	22	0.00	56	0.04	65	0.04	51	0.06	48	0.05
Biret 1990		71	0.34	23	0.00	68	0.05	46	0.05	75	0.04	65	0.04
Blet 2003		66	0.35	24	0.00	67	0.05	48	0.05	65	0.04	60	0.04
Block 1995		55	0.37	6	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.04	62	0.04
Blumental 1952		68	0.34	46	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	85	0.03	80	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		7	0.53	47	0.00	7	0.18	5	0.54	41	0.12	9	0.25
Brailowsky 1960		75	0.31	25	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.04	69	0.03
Bunin 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987b		1	0.99	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Chiu 1999		59	0.35	26	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	59	0.05	46	0.05
Cohen 1997		86	0.21	27	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	85	0.03	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		61	0.35	48	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	78	0.03	66	0.04
Csalog 1996		58	0.35	49	0.00	57	0.03	76	0.03	68	0.04	77	0.03
Czerny 1949		2	0.58	28	0.00	4	0.26	3	0.56	35	0.34	5	0.44
Czerny 1990		50	0.38	9	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	85	0.03	83	0.03
Duchoud 2007		51	0.37	7	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	49	0.06	43	0.08
Ezaki 2006		36	0.43	50	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.21	74	0.04	38	0.09
Falvay 1989		73	0.33	29	0.00	78	0.03	87	0.03	86	0.03	71	0.03
Farrell 1958		81	0.28	51	0.00	77	0.03	86	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.44	52	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.19	51	0.05	35	0.10
Fliere 1977		12	0.50	53	0.00	15	0.08	13	0.48	49	0.06	12	0.17
Fou 1978		69	0.34	30	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	87	0.03	75	0.03
Francois 1956		53	0.37	54	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	87	0.03
Friedman 1923		57	0.36	55	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.20	52	0.06	34	0.11
Friedman 1923b		63	0.35	31	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.19	63	0.05	37	0.10
Friedman 1930		48	0.38	3	0.00	32	0.08	33	0.28	45	0.09	16	0.16
Garcia 2007		47	0.38	10	0.00	59	0.03	75	0.03	74	0.04	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b		39	0.42	13	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	57	0.04	45	0.07
Gierzod 1998		16	0.48	56	0.00	30	0.15	28	0.35	72	0.04	31	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.43	57	0.00	31	0.08	32	0.30	65	0.03	41	0.09
Groot 1988		32	0.44	14	0.00	11	0.08	29	0.32	49	0.06	23	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		18	0.46	58	0.00	23	0.09	15	0.46	46	0.06	14	0.17
Hatto 1993		31	0.44	59	0.00	28	0.10	21	0.40	80	0.03	33	0.11
Hatto 1997		30	0.44	60	0.00	29	0.11	26	0.39	52	0.06	18	0.15
Horowitz 1949		4	0.56	2	0.00	8	0.18	4	0.54	11	0.51	3	0.52
Indjic 1988		28	0.44	61	0.00	27	0.11	20	0.40	70	0.04	28	0.13
Kapell 1951		8	0.51	32	0.00	21	0.07	23	0.40	54	0.05	20	0.14
Kissin 1993		42	0.41	62	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	86	0.02	76	0.03
Kushner 1989		25	0.45	63	0.00	35	0.06	38	0.20	73	0.03	42	0.08
Luisada 1991		41	0.41	64	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	85	0.03	51	0.04
Lushtak 2004		23	0.45	33	0.00	25	0.10	31	0.32	51	0.06	22	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.46	65	0.00	10	0.07	16	0.45	70	0.04	27	0.13
Magaloff 1978		70	0.34	66	0.00	72	0.05	52	0.05	79	0.03	53	0.04
Magin 1975		19	0.46	34	0.00	12	0.08	18	0.43	71	0.04	26	0.13
Michalowski 1933		45	0.39	67	0.00	19	0.06	27	0.37	31	0.26	7	0.31
Milkina 1970		44	0.39	15	0.00	58	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Mohovich 1999		46	0.39	68	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	87	0.03	81	0.03
Moravec 1969		80	0.29	16	0.00	70	0.04	59	0.04	86	0.02	68	0.03
Morozova 2008		33	0.43	69	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.23	61	0.05	32	0.11
Neighaus 1950		14	0.48	70	0.00	22	0.09	17	0.44	60	0.05	19	0.15
Niedzielski 1931		60	0.35	71	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	60	0.04	55	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.45	35	0.00	13	0.08	9	0.49	61	0.05	15	0.16
Osinska 1989		38	0.42	72	0.00	50	0.06	45	0.06	84	0.03	52	0.04
Pachmann 1927		49	0.38	36	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	45	0.08	47	0.05
Paderewski 1930		65	0.35	37	0.00	66	0.05	53	0.05	59	0.04	58	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		27	0.45	38	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.20	67	0.04	40	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.27	39	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	77	0.04	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		13	0.48	73	0.00	18	0.06	19	0.41	65	0.04	24	0.13
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.37	74	0.00	55	0.04	64	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		40	0.42	40	0.00	33	0.09	30	0.32	57	0.05	25	0.13
Rangell 2001		64	0.35	75	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	79	0.03	64	0.04
Richter 1976		5	0.55	76	0.00	3	0.19	6	0.53	16	0.53	2	0.53
Rosen 1989		72	0.33	77	0.00	69	0.05	50	0.05	78	0.04	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.36	78	0.00	61	0.03	74	0.03	45	0.06	61	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.24	4	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.25	41	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.30	17	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.24	42	0.00	86	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.17	79	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.04	70	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		67	0.35	11	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.04	73	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		76	0.31	80	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		79	0.30	81	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.03	78	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.56	18	0.00	2	0.31	2	0.58	26	0.42	4	0.49
Shebanova 2002		11	0.50	5	0.00	14	0.09	7	0.50	57	0.05	17	0.16
Smith 1975		78	0.30	82	0.00	74	0.04	71	0.04	60	0.04	54	0.04
Sokolov 2002		34	0.43	83	0.00	17	0.07	22	0.40	42	0.10	10	0.20
Sztompka 1959		43	0.41	84	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	79	0.03	59	0.04
Tomsic 1995		74	0.32	85	0.00	82	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.05	57	0.04
Uninsky 1932		21	0.46	43	0.00	24	0.10	25	0.39	58	0.04	30	0.12
Uninsky 1971		6	0.54	86	0.00	6	0.18	11	0.49	42	0.16	8	0.28
Wasowski 1980		26	0.45	12	0.00	36	0.05	37	0.21	73	0.04	39	0.09
Zak 1937		10	0.50	44	0.00	20	0.06	14	0.46	69	0.04	21	0.14
Zak 1951		9	0.51	87	0.00	9	0.08	10	0.49	53	0.06	13	0.17
Random 1		90	-0.02	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	10	0.46	36	0.10
Random 2		89	-0.01	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	23	0.28	49	0.05
Random 3		88	-0.01	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	18	0.29	50	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).