Boshniakovich 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		12	0.67	60	0.00	21	0.09	23	0.47	27	0.40	28	0.43
Anderszewski 2003		10	0.68	21	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.54	10	0.56	16	0.55
Ashkenazy 1981		44	0.57	58	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.20	23	0.31	39	0.25
Bacha 2000		80	0.42	68	0.00	78	0.04	77	0.04	81	0.03	83	0.03
Badura 1965		23	0.63	42	0.00	25	0.15	22	0.47	3	0.63	18	0.54
Barbosa 1983		76	0.44	17	0.01	64	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.05	79	0.04
Biret 1990		43	0.57	7	0.04	33	0.09	32	0.32	27	0.28	33	0.30
Blet 2003		41	0.58	44	0.00	50	0.08	47	0.08	4	0.52	44	0.20
Block 1995		59	0.52	75	0.00	41	0.05	44	0.10	24	0.31	47	0.18
Blumental 1952		71	0.48	65	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.12	64	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.44	76	0.00	80	0.04	79	0.04	48	0.06	69	0.05
Bunin 1987		53	0.53	16	0.01	42	0.05	41	0.12	5	0.54	40	0.25
Bunin 1987b		56	0.53	45	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.11	5	0.53	41	0.24
Chiu 1999		77	0.44	56	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04	76	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.30	54	0.00	84	0.04	82	0.04	50	0.05	81	0.04
Cortot 1951		67	0.49	77	0.00	66	0.04	73	0.04	26	0.40	56	0.13
Csalog 1996		79	0.43	27	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	58	0.05	80	0.04
Czerny 1949		6	0.69	14	0.01	6	0.13	14	0.57	13	0.56	12	0.56
Czerny 1990		25	0.63	61	0.00	34	0.09	36	0.27	34	0.27	36	0.27
Duchoud 2007		68	0.49	12	0.01	67	0.04	75	0.04	18	0.32	59	0.11
Ezaki 2006		45	0.57	87	0.00	57	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.04	68	0.05
Falvay 1989		74	0.44	40	0.00	81	0.05	62	0.05	62	0.06	72	0.05
Farrell 1958		69	0.48	53	0.00	70	0.05	60	0.05	46	0.07	67	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.52	84	0.00	72	0.06	51	0.06	35	0.26	57	0.12
Fliere 1977		3	0.71	4	0.05	3	0.16	3	0.64	6	0.54	9	0.59
Fou 1978		36	0.61	46	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.28	29	0.27	35	0.27
Francois 1956		54	0.53	25	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	34	0.29	60	0.11
Friedman 1923		48	0.56	71	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	18	0.47	49	0.18
Friedman 1923b		47	0.56	79	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	19	0.48	48	0.18
Friedman 1930		38	0.59	23	0.00	46	0.08	46	0.08	19	0.48	45	0.20
Garcia 2007		52	0.54	36	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	25	0.41	53	0.14
Garcia 2007b		55	0.53	69	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	28	0.34	52	0.16
Gierzod 1998		1	0.75	1	0.35	1	0.35	1	0.74	14	0.60	1	0.67
Gornostaeva 1994		15	0.67	6	0.04	17	0.11	19	0.51	4	0.71	7	0.60
Groot 1988		64	0.51	35	0.00	54	0.04	69	0.04	50	0.06	75	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		2	0.73	2	0.15	2	0.30	2	0.67	11	0.62	2	0.64
Hatto 1993		31	0.61	20	0.01	14	0.18	7	0.59	12	0.48	20	0.53
Hatto 1997		28	0.62	10	0.01	13	0.13	9	0.58	12	0.50	17	0.54
Horowitz 1949		46	0.57	62	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	9	0.53	42	0.24
Indjic 1988		26	0.63	13	0.01	12	0.12	8	0.59	10	0.51	15	0.55
Kapell 1951		39	0.59	57	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.33	36	0.21	38	0.26
Kissin 1993		4	0.70	41	0.00	5	0.17	6	0.61	15	0.59	6	0.60
Kushner 1989		17	0.66	15	0.01	18	0.08	16	0.54	25	0.50	21	0.52
Luisada 1991		37	0.60	19	0.01	35	0.07	35	0.27	31	0.29	34	0.28
Lushtak 2004		51	0.54	55	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	36	0.22	61	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.67	5	0.04	15	0.13	13	0.57	6	0.60	11	0.58
Magaloff 1978		65	0.50	34	0.00	69	0.04	78	0.04	49	0.06	71	0.05
Magin 1975		9	0.68	28	0.00	23	0.12	29	0.42	27	0.35	29	0.38
Michalowski 1933		32	0.61	31	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.21	6	0.59	32	0.35
Milkina 1970		20	0.64	11	0.01	27	0.15	26	0.45	28	0.43	26	0.44
Mohovich 1999		57	0.53	80	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.05
Moravec 1969		83	0.38	43	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03
Morozova 2008		35	0.61	47	0.00	31	0.09	33	0.32	23	0.40	30	0.36
Neighaus 1950		7	0.68	49	0.00	8	0.09	11	0.58	4	0.62	8	0.60
Niedzielski 1931		50	0.54	50	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	41	0.15	63	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.63	85	0.00	20	0.07	25	0.45	24	0.41	27	0.43
Osinska 1989		16	0.66	26	0.00	26	0.15	21	0.48	28	0.43	25	0.45
Pachmann 1927		40	0.59	22	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	1	0.66	50	0.16
Paderewski 1930		42	0.57	51	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	2	0.67	43	0.20
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.54	37	0.00	51	0.04	66	0.04	26	0.32	58	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		63	0.51	39	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	28	0.34	54	0.13
Poblocka 1999		21	0.64	72	0.00	24	0.14	24	0.46	20	0.47	24	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		72	0.46	88	0.00	73	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		66	0.49	81	0.00	68	0.04	80	0.04	81	0.04	77	0.04
Rangell 2001		60	0.51	33	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	6	0.54	51	0.16
Richter 1976		5	0.69	8	0.03	7	0.15	15	0.56	3	0.67	4	0.61
Rosen 1989		29	0.62	52	0.00	38	0.06	40	0.17	35	0.24	46	0.20
Rosenthal 1930		73	0.45	89	0.00	77	0.04	76	0.04	41	0.19	62	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.35	82	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.35	83	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	79	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		81	0.40	66	0.00	82	0.04	70	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.33	73	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		75	0.44	32	0.00	79	0.04	81	0.04	53	0.06	70	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		70	0.48	59	0.00	71	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.04	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.39	48	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	81	0.03	88	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.51	29	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	42	0.14	65	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.67	18	0.01	22	0.10	20	0.50	13	0.57	19	0.53
Shebanova 2002		22	0.64	63	0.00	29	0.14	28	0.42	27	0.31	31	0.36
Smith 1975		34	0.61	38	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.19	18	0.35	37	0.26
Sokolov 2002		30	0.62	9	0.02	19	0.08	18	0.52	4	0.59	13	0.55
Sztompka 1959		11	0.67	86	0.00	9	0.09	12	0.58	18	0.53	14	0.55
Tomsic 1995		62	0.51	64	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	34	0.33	55	0.13
Uninsky 1932		33	0.61	74	0.00	28	0.12	27	0.44	9	0.55	22	0.49
Uninsky 1971		8	0.68	3	0.13	4	0.18	10	0.58	9	0.61	10	0.59
Wasowski 1980		27	0.62	30	0.00	30	0.11	30	0.41	10	0.53	23	0.47
Zak 1937		18	0.65	24	0.00	11	0.11	5	0.62	8	0.60	3	0.61
Zak 1951		19	0.65	67	0.00	10	0.10	4	0.62	8	0.58	5	0.60
Random 1		89	-0.08	78	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	27	0.21	73	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.08	70	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	48	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.03	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	24	0.24	66	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).