Afanassiev 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Anderszewski 2003		46	0.59	88	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	60	0.04	82	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		23	0.66	35	0.00	21	0.12	23	0.44	8	0.52	17	0.48
Bacha 2000		65	0.51	32	0.00	62	0.05	52	0.05	26	0.26	59	0.11
Badura 1965		29	0.64	9	0.02	34	0.07	36	0.25	7	0.58	33	0.38
Barbosa 1983		82	0.44	19	0.01	70	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.05	80	0.04
Biret 1990		31	0.64	13	0.02	30	0.09	26	0.42	22	0.38	31	0.40
Blet 2003		51	0.57	59	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	13	0.41	51	0.14
Block 1995		71	0.49	66	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	70	0.04	85	0.04
Blumental 1952		32	0.64	6	0.04	12	0.09	24	0.42	10	0.46	24	0.44
Boshniakovich 1969		16	0.67	7	0.03	22	0.15	27	0.40	23	0.47	25	0.43
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.51	76	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	45	0.10	75	0.05
Bunin 1987		84	0.42	85	0.00	84	0.02	88	0.02	34	0.23	73	0.07
Bunin 1987b		85	0.41	86	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	36	0.25	65	0.09
Chiu 1999		48	0.58	43	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	21	0.29	56	0.12
Cohen 1997		86	0.39	69	0.00	87	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.05	86	0.04
Cortot 1951		73	0.48	41	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	35	0.25	69	0.09
Csalog 1996		78	0.45	47	0.00	71	0.04	65	0.04	64	0.04	81	0.04
Czerny 1949		25	0.66	54	0.00	18	0.10	16	0.48	23	0.49	16	0.48
Czerny 1990		21	0.66	63	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.42	26	0.39	30	0.40
Duchoud 2007		70	0.50	30	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	7	0.49	47	0.16
Ezaki 2006		24	0.66	36	0.00	33	0.06	37	0.21	23	0.39	38	0.29
Falvay 1989		69	0.50	39	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	49	0.08	76	0.05
Farrell 1958		54	0.56	17	0.01	50	0.05	64	0.05	40	0.22	62	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		62	0.53	48	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	27	0.35	57	0.12
Fliere 1977		3	0.74	21	0.01	6	0.16	7	0.58	15	0.48	12	0.53
Fou 1978		19	0.67	24	0.01	27	0.10	29	0.38	16	0.47	27	0.42
Francois 1956		55	0.55	64	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	21	0.47	49	0.15
Friedman 1923		34	0.63	44	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.26	9	0.54	34	0.37
Friedman 1923b		30	0.64	60	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.35	8	0.58	22	0.45
Friedman 1930		38	0.62	65	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.19	13	0.52	37	0.31
Garcia 2007		57	0.55	87	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	26	0.41	46	0.17
Garcia 2007b		49	0.58	77	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	25	0.38	48	0.16
Gierzod 1998		2	0.74	1	0.41	1	0.41	1	0.69	8	0.65	1	0.67
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.55	79	0.00	55	0.05	63	0.05	36	0.16	68	0.09
Groot 1988		53	0.56	22	0.01	48	0.05	53	0.05	16	0.38	53	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.69	23	0.01	20	0.10	17	0.48	26	0.48	18	0.48
Hatto 1993		18	0.67	34	0.00	15	0.16	15	0.48	17	0.39	26	0.43
Hatto 1997		14	0.68	73	0.00	17	0.11	19	0.46	18	0.39	29	0.42
Horowitz 1949		43	0.59	33	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	2	0.60	43	0.20
Indjic 1988		10	0.68	61	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.49	15	0.43	19	0.46
Kapell 1951		58	0.54	83	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	52	0.06	74	0.06
Kissin 1993		1	0.75	2	0.07	2	0.26	2	0.63	5	0.69	2	0.66
Kushner 1989		35	0.62	70	0.00	47	0.08	45	0.08	54	0.06	72	0.07
Luisada 1991		5	0.72	14	0.01	11	0.20	9	0.57	3	0.69	3	0.63
Lushtak 2004		63	0.53	89	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	70	0.04	84	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		60	0.54	10	0.02	52	0.05	54	0.05	30	0.18	66	0.09
Magaloff 1978		52	0.57	25	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	20	0.34	50	0.14
Magin 1975		7	0.71	8	0.02	3	0.11	4	0.62	4	0.61	6	0.61
Michalowski 1933		41	0.60	46	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.27	2	0.66	28	0.42
Milkina 1970		17	0.67	20	0.01	19	0.10	13	0.50	23	0.47	15	0.48
Mohovich 1999		42	0.59	27	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	31	0.37	41	0.22
Moravec 1969		76	0.47	51	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	45	0.06	77	0.04
Morozova 2008		33	0.64	42	0.00	28	0.10	30	0.35	19	0.42	32	0.38
Neighaus 1950		26	0.66	55	0.00	26	0.08	20	0.45	13	0.54	13	0.49
Niedzielski 1931		40	0.60	71	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.27	8	0.49	35	0.36
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.67	12	0.02	9	0.16	8	0.58	4	0.62	8	0.60
Osinska 1989		36	0.62	29	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.27	41	0.14	44	0.19
Pachmann 1927		74	0.48	75	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	34	0.24	71	0.08
Paderewski 1930		64	0.51	67	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	21	0.40	55	0.13
Perlemuter 1992		37	0.62	49	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.15	7	0.57	39	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.48	57	0.00	65	0.04	73	0.04	23	0.40	54	0.13
Poblocka 1999		20	0.66	31	0.00	16	0.09	18	0.47	15	0.50	14	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.57	78	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.14	26	0.28	42	0.20
Rachmaninoff 1923		13	0.68	3	0.06	7	0.15	6	0.59	1	0.65	4	0.62
Rangell 2001		87	0.38	80	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	68	0.04	88	0.03
Richter 1976		39	0.62	50	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	25	0.48	40	0.24
Rosen 1989		11	0.68	18	0.01	13	0.10	12	0.53	6	0.61	10	0.57
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.50	68	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	15	0.52	52	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.44	58	0.00	81	0.04	71	0.04	28	0.27	63	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.44	81	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	22	0.36	64	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.46	84	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	27	0.37	61	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.44	56	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	20	0.47	58	0.12
Rossi 2007		66	0.51	45	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	36	0.24	70	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.54	37	0.00	67	0.05	59	0.05	61	0.04	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.49	16	0.01	64	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.05	87	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.54	62	0.00	69	0.05	62	0.05	74	0.04	83	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		4	0.72	15	0.01	4	0.15	5	0.61	4	0.61	7	0.61
Shebanova 2002		6	0.71	5	0.04	5	0.17	3	0.63	6	0.61	5	0.62
Smith 1975		47	0.58	26	0.00	51	0.05	60	0.05	33	0.23	60	0.11
Sokolov 2002		44	0.59	28	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.20	8	0.51	36	0.32
Sztompka 1959		8	0.70	11	0.02	10	0.18	10	0.57	14	0.57	9	0.57
Tomsic 1995		83	0.43	53	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	49	0.08	79	0.04
Uninsky 1932		28	0.65	72	0.00	29	0.10	28	0.39	12	0.52	21	0.45
Uninsky 1971		12	0.68	4	0.06	8	0.16	11	0.54	15	0.58	11	0.56
Wasowski 1980		45	0.59	52	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.13	34	0.26	45	0.18
Zak 1937		22	0.66	40	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.45	20	0.44	23	0.44
Zak 1951		27	0.65	38	0.00	23	0.06	21	0.45	16	0.46	20	0.45
Random 1		90	-0.13	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.01	82	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	11	0.43	67	0.09
Random 3		89	-0.10	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	70	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).