Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		35	0.61	38	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.17	54	0.06	42	0.10
Ax 1995		6	0.72	16	0.01	7	0.25	4	0.69	36	0.11	12	0.28
Bacha 1998		39	0.59	49	0.00	46	0.07	43	0.07	57	0.05	51	0.06
Barbosa 1983		57	0.51	44	0.00	50	0.08	40	0.08	63	0.04	54	0.06
BenOr 1989		44	0.58	33	0.00	26	0.09	29	0.22	43	0.07	36	0.12
Biret 1990		37	0.60	65	0.00	38	0.06	54	0.06	38	0.08	48	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.69	6	0.02	8	0.23	9	0.56	14	0.53	4	0.54
Chiu 1999		56	0.52	66	0.00	59	0.06	51	0.06	43	0.06	49	0.06
Clidat 1994		45	0.57	61	0.00	49	0.08	36	0.08	62	0.05	56	0.06
Cohen 1997		60	0.49	32	0.00	62	0.06	55	0.06	30	0.19	38	0.11
Cortot 1951		62	0.42	36	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	14	0.44	35	0.13
Csalog 1996		8	0.70	55	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.46	12	0.43	6	0.44
Czerny 1989		41	0.58	12	0.01	40	0.07	45	0.07	45	0.05	52	0.06
Ezaki 2006		12	0.68	15	0.01	12	0.10	18	0.42	34	0.11	17	0.21
Falvay 1989		7	0.71	10	0.01	6	0.34	6	0.66	32	0.14	11	0.30
Fiorentino 1962		5	0.73	4	0.07	3	0.27	2	0.75	14	0.59	1	0.67
Fliere 1977		34	0.61	25	0.00	34	0.08	38	0.08	45	0.06	44	0.07
Fou 1978		38	0.59	40	0.00	43	0.05	62	0.05	47	0.07	50	0.06
Francois 1956		15	0.67	24	0.00	10	0.11	19	0.42	12	0.50	5	0.46
Goldenweiser 1946		54	0.55	18	0.00	37	0.06	50	0.06	3	0.68	19	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.45	50	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.06	61	0.05
Groot 1988		20	0.66	30	0.00	22	0.11	20	0.41	50	0.06	27	0.16
Hatto 1993		17	0.67	41	0.00	17	0.10	15	0.45	50	0.06	28	0.16
Hatto 1997		21	0.66	45	0.00	19	0.09	23	0.35	40	0.07	24	0.16
Horszowski 1983		59	0.49	43	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	37	0.06	58	0.05
Indjic 2001		18	0.67	39	0.00	18	0.15	17	0.42	55	0.06	26	0.16
Katin 1996		22	0.66	11	0.01	25	0.14	21	0.38	34	0.12	18	0.21
Kiepura 1999		53	0.55	35	0.00	41	0.06	47	0.06	31	0.17	39	0.10
Korecka 1992		55	0.54	64	0.00	52	0.07	46	0.07	27	0.32	30	0.15
Kushner 1990		49	0.57	46	0.00	48	0.08	37	0.08	40	0.08	43	0.08
Lilamand 2001		31	0.62	28	0.00	42	0.05	60	0.05	5	0.50	23	0.16
Luisada 1990		33	0.61	53	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.20	25	0.31	13	0.25
Luisada 2008		42	0.58	20	0.00	44	0.06	53	0.06	29	0.21	37	0.11
Lushtak 2004		25	0.64	47	0.00	21	0.10	24	0.35	47	0.07	25	0.16
Malcuzynski 1951		16	0.67	5	0.04	9	0.18	8	0.56	50	0.06	20	0.18
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.63	14	0.01	11	0.11	13	0.47	49	0.05	31	0.15
Magaloff 1977		48	0.57	29	0.00	47	0.07	44	0.07	33	0.15	41	0.10
Magin 1975		26	0.64	23	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.20	33	0.12	29	0.15
Meguri 1997		50	0.57	42	0.00	55	0.08	41	0.08	48	0.05	53	0.06
Milkina 1970		11	0.68	21	0.00	15	0.09	11	0.51	38	0.10	14	0.23
Mohovich 1999		30	0.63	37	0.00	28	0.10	27	0.26	36	0.08	33	0.14
Nezu 2005		43	0.58	17	0.00	45	0.08	39	0.08	47	0.07	46	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.76	2	0.22	2	0.32	7	0.63	12	0.51	2	0.57
Olejniczak 1990		40	0.59	57	0.00	39	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.06	57	0.06
Osinska 1989		24	0.64	51	0.00	20	0.09	16	0.44	52	0.06	21	0.16
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.57	58	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	5	0.39	32	0.14
Poblocka 1999		27	0.64	26	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.17	51	0.06	40	0.10
Rangell 2001		52	0.56	27	0.00	56	0.07	42	0.07	57	0.04	62	0.05
Richter 1960		63	0.41	54	0.00	64	0.06	56	0.06	56	0.04	59	0.05
Richter 1961		64	0.40	60	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	49	0.05	64	0.04
Rosen 1989		14	0.67	13	0.01	24	0.11	22	0.37	23	0.30	10	0.33
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.63	8	0.01	27	0.09	26	0.32	37	0.08	22	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.66	3	0.09	13	0.10	12	0.51	27	0.28	8	0.38
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.65	22	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.24	41	0.07	34	0.13
Rudanovskaya 2007		51	0.57	31	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	55	0.05	60	0.05
Shebanova 2002		46	0.57	52	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	48	0.06	55	0.06
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sztompka 1959		13	0.67	34	0.00	23	0.10	25	0.34	9	0.55	7	0.43
Tanyel 1992		9	0.69	19	0.00	14	0.09	10	0.52	32	0.22	9	0.34
Tsujii 2005		4	0.73	7	0.02	5	0.19	3	0.70	40	0.07	16	0.22
Uninsky 1959		3	0.74	9	0.01	4	0.16	5	0.68	14	0.44	3	0.55
Vardi 1988		36	0.60	59	0.00	35	0.09	34	0.09	47	0.06	45	0.07
Wasowski 1980		58	0.50	48	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.04	63	0.04
Zimerman 1975		32	0.62	67	0.00	36	0.09	35	0.09	45	0.06	47	0.07
Average		2	0.76	1	0.38	1	0.38	1	0.79	52	0.06	15	0.22
Random 1		67	-0.08	62	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	59	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		66	-0.06	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	47	0.05	65	0.03
Random 3		65	-0.06	63	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	56	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).