Rudanovskaya 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		18	0.62	3	0.11	4	0.25	3	0.68	43	0.07	12	0.22
Ax 1995		14	0.63	14	0.01	8	0.15	15	0.49	59	0.06	22	0.17
Bacha 1998		59	0.46	64	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	35	0.06	46	0.05
Barbosa 1983		62	0.42	48	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.06	58	0.04	49	0.05
BenOr 1989		60	0.44	28	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	57	0.05	56	0.05
Biret 1990		48	0.53	44	0.00	49	0.06	35	0.06	49	0.06	40	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.53	62	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	63	0.04	43	0.05
Chiu 1999		24	0.61	11	0.02	15	0.11	18	0.46	30	0.24	4	0.33
Clidat 1994		15	0.63	8	0.03	17	0.10	11	0.52	37	0.09	10	0.22
Cohen 1997		57	0.47	42	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	19	0.38	29	0.14
Cortot 1951		64	0.23	63	0.00	64	0.05	46	0.05	65	0.03	65	0.04
Csalog 1996		10	0.66	9	0.03	9	0.13	6	0.59	31	0.17	5	0.32
Czerny 1989		5	0.67	38	0.00	18	0.10	21	0.42	51	0.05	27	0.14
Ezaki 2006		28	0.59	13	0.01	43	0.05	49	0.05	61	0.05	41	0.05
Falvay 1989		7	0.67	15	0.01	13	0.17	14	0.50	40	0.07	16	0.19
Fiorentino 1962		43	0.54	41	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.06	59	0.05	54	0.05
Fliere 1977		12	0.64	4	0.09	6	0.20	12	0.51	37	0.08	13	0.20
Fou 1978		42	0.55	32	0.00	24	0.10	25	0.30	45	0.07	26	0.14
Francois 1956		22	0.61	30	0.00	5	0.17	7	0.59	25	0.25	1	0.38
Goldenweiser 1946		20	0.62	16	0.01	51	0.05	52	0.05	31	0.12	34	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		63	0.35	23	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.04	63	0.04
Groot 1988		3	0.69	2	0.17	2	0.19	5	0.60	31	0.14	7	0.29
Hatto 1993		23	0.61	29	0.00	31	0.09	28	0.27	54	0.06	30	0.13
Hatto 1997		16	0.62	22	0.00	30	0.10	27	0.29	55	0.05	31	0.12
Horszowski 1983		45	0.54	43	0.00	63	0.06	39	0.06	60	0.04	42	0.05
Indjic 2001		17	0.62	17	0.01	28	0.09	23	0.33	51	0.06	28	0.14
Katin 1996		35	0.57	50	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.06	48	0.06	38	0.06
Kiepura 1999		61	0.43	39	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.04	59	0.04
Korecka 1992		54	0.48	46	0.00	61	0.06	42	0.06	54	0.05	47	0.05
Kushner 1990		58	0.46	24	0.00	22	0.10	31	0.25	59	0.04	33	0.10
Lilamand 2001		25	0.61	10	0.02	23	0.11	22	0.34	15	0.34	3	0.34
Luisada 1990		52	0.49	67	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04
Luisada 2008		56	0.48	52	0.00	57	0.04	64	0.04	65	0.03	66	0.03
Lushtak 2004		39	0.55	47	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.29	42	0.08	24	0.15
Malcuzynski 1951		46	0.54	65	0.00	38	0.05	56	0.05	59	0.05	57	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		53	0.48	61	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	62	0.04	61	0.04
Magaloff 1977		55	0.48	53	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	44	0.07	50	0.05
Magin 1975		49	0.51	66	0.00	62	0.06	45	0.06	53	0.06	37	0.06
Meguri 1997		21	0.62	25	0.00	20	0.13	19	0.45	20	0.28	2	0.35
Milkina 1970		27	0.60	45	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.44	52	0.06	23	0.16
Mohovich 1999		8	0.67	6	0.03	14	0.11	10	0.55	39	0.07	15	0.20
Nezu 2005		50	0.50	60	0.00	36	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.06	52	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.67	12	0.01	10	0.12	9	0.56	41	0.07	14	0.20
Olejniczak 1990		33	0.57	20	0.01	34	0.06	34	0.06	64	0.04	58	0.05
Osinska 1989		26	0.60	21	0.01	26	0.08	24	0.32	55	0.06	25	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.58	51	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	51	0.04	60	0.04
Poblocka 1999		38	0.56	55	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	56	0.05	44	0.05
Rangell 2001		44	0.54	49	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.04
Richter 1960		30	0.59	37	0.00	27	0.08	29	0.26	31	0.13	18	0.18
Richter 1961		36	0.57	40	0.00	32	0.12	32	0.23	29	0.12	19	0.17
Rosen 1989		13	0.64	34	0.00	11	0.12	4	0.61	34	0.13	8	0.28
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.62	19	0.01	19	0.11	17	0.47	39	0.07	17	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.55	36	0.00	25	0.10	30	0.26	58	0.05	32	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.55	35	0.00	40	0.05	51	0.05	43	0.07	39	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		4	0.67	5	0.06	7	0.11	16	0.47	28	0.20	6	0.31
Smith 1975		37	0.57	56	0.00	39	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.06	45	0.05
Sztompka 1959		34	0.57	54	0.00	53	0.06	37	0.06	56	0.05	48	0.05
Tanyel 1992		29	0.59	27	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.17	63	0.04	35	0.08
Tsujii 2005		1	0.73	1	0.27	1	0.27	2	0.72	43	0.07	11	0.22
Uninsky 1959		9	0.67	33	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.51	52	0.06	20	0.17
Vardi 1988		11	0.66	31	0.00	12	0.15	8	0.57	60	0.05	21	0.17
Wasowski 1980		51	0.49	18	0.01	52	0.06	44	0.06	46	0.06	36	0.06
Zimerman 1975		31	0.58	26	0.00	44	0.06	36	0.06	63	0.04	55	0.05
Average		2	0.71	7	0.03	3	0.25	1	0.78	48	0.07	9	0.23
Random 1		67	-0.07	57	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	42	0.05	67	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.03	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	27	0.15	51	0.05
Random 3		66	-0.04	59	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	25	0.15	53	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).