Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		21	0.73	31	0.00	16	0.11	20	0.56	8	0.55	23	0.55
Ax 1995		8	0.77	28	0.00	8	0.09	7	0.66	11	0.59	12	0.62
Bacha 1998		47	0.62	39	0.00	49	0.04	63	0.04	25	0.29	52	0.11
Barbosa 1983		49	0.61	49	0.00	37	0.08	47	0.08	26	0.33	45	0.16
BenOr 1989		46	0.63	50	0.00	40	0.08	45	0.08	25	0.35	44	0.17
Biret 1990		33	0.70	13	0.01	28	0.12	29	0.37	9	0.69	25	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.72	51	0.00	30	0.14	28	0.39	7	0.58	27	0.48
Chiu 1999		37	0.68	63	0.00	42	0.12	36	0.12	9	0.54	34	0.25
Clidat 1994		26	0.71	32	0.00	23	0.11	23	0.52	4	0.60	19	0.56
Cohen 1997		61	0.55	52	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	9	0.54	47	0.15
Cortot 1951		64	0.34	26	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.04	65	0.04
Csalog 1996		39	0.68	53	0.00	43	0.13	34	0.13	14	0.40	37	0.23
Czerny 1989		34	0.69	36	0.00	38	0.10	37	0.10	18	0.39	40	0.20
Ezaki 2006		22	0.72	8	0.01	36	0.12	35	0.12	25	0.32	39	0.20
Falvay 1989		23	0.72	4	0.02	17	0.11	16	0.58	23	0.37	29	0.46
Fiorentino 1962		11	0.77	21	0.00	11	0.08	19	0.56	9	0.65	17	0.60
Fliere 1977		32	0.70	57	0.00	35	0.10	40	0.10	24	0.37	43	0.19
Fou 1978		28	0.71	3	0.03	21	0.10	24	0.51	10	0.59	21	0.55
Francois 1956		27	0.71	19	0.00	29	0.12	30	0.35	3	0.72	26	0.50
Goldenweiser 1946		63	0.42	65	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	45	0.05	63	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.52	61	0.00	50	0.05	55	0.05	30	0.19	53	0.10
Groot 1988		40	0.68	45	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.19	16	0.35	33	0.26
Hatto 1993		12	0.76	37	0.00	15	0.11	13	0.61	11	0.59	18	0.60
Hatto 1997		10	0.77	14	0.01	14	0.13	11	0.64	11	0.61	10	0.62
Horszowski 1983		56	0.57	56	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	43	0.05	62	0.05
Indjic 2001		9	0.77	29	0.00	10	0.09	8	0.66	10	0.60	9	0.63
Katin 1996		6	0.79	11	0.01	6	0.11	9	0.66	8	0.71	6	0.68
Kiepura 1999		53	0.59	42	0.00	48	0.04	62	0.04	28	0.21	54	0.09
Korecka 1992		58	0.56	38	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	25	0.33	49	0.13
Kushner 1990		41	0.66	10	0.01	22	0.11	27	0.45	2	0.67	22	0.55
Lilamand 2001		57	0.56	25	0.00	59	0.06	50	0.06	38	0.06	61	0.06
Luisada 1990		44	0.65	15	0.01	44	0.08	46	0.08	14	0.57	38	0.21
Luisada 2008		45	0.65	35	0.00	45	0.10	39	0.10	14	0.63	35	0.25
Lushtak 2004		30	0.70	27	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.19	21	0.39	32	0.27
Malcuzynski 1951		24	0.72	22	0.00	25	0.14	15	0.59	20	0.39	28	0.48
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.68	41	0.00	26	0.16	26	0.50	21	0.37	30	0.43
Magaloff 1977		50	0.60	55	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	24	0.24	50	0.12
Magin 1975		42	0.65	48	0.00	46	0.09	44	0.09	39	0.07	56	0.08
Meguri 1997		52	0.59	62	0.00	57	0.06	51	0.06	34	0.09	58	0.07
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		16	0.74	17	0.01	20	0.10	21	0.55	3	0.65	16	0.60
Nezu 2005		20	0.74	7	0.01	12	0.09	10	0.64	12	0.69	7	0.66
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.79	23	0.00	7	0.15	6	0.67	2	0.76	3	0.71
Olejniczak 1990		35	0.69	46	0.00	31	0.11	31	0.30	16	0.51	31	0.39
Osinska 1989		19	0.74	12	0.01	13	0.10	17	0.58	16	0.52	20	0.55
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.56	33	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	50	0.05	64	0.05
Poblocka 1999		14	0.76	43	0.00	24	0.11	22	0.54	10	0.68	13	0.61
Rangell 2001		43	0.65	34	0.00	47	0.09	41	0.09	33	0.26	48	0.15
Richter 1960		59	0.56	47	0.00	56	0.07	48	0.07	35	0.07	59	0.07
Richter 1961		55	0.58	40	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	36	0.07	60	0.06
Rosen 1989		31	0.70	6	0.01	39	0.09	43	0.09	15	0.44	42	0.20
Rubinstein 1939		3	0.80	16	0.01	5	0.27	3	0.70	6	0.70	4	0.70
Rubinstein 1952		7	0.78	30	0.00	4	0.17	4	0.69	5	0.71	5	0.70
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.81	2	0.03	3	0.16	2	0.72	6	0.73	2	0.72
Rudanovskaya 2007		51	0.60	64	0.00	55	0.06	52	0.06	20	0.44	46	0.16
Shebanova 2002		29	0.71	54	0.00	34	0.09	42	0.09	16	0.43	41	0.20
Smith 1975		36	0.68	58	0.00	41	0.10	38	0.10	11	0.51	36	0.23
Sztompka 1959		48	0.62	44	0.00	52	0.05	60	0.05	33	0.14	57	0.08
Tanyel 1992		15	0.74	5	0.01	18	0.10	14	0.59	4	0.70	8	0.64
Tsujii 2005		4	0.80	9	0.01	2	0.14	5	0.68	15	0.56	11	0.62
Uninsky 1959		13	0.76	24	0.00	9	0.10	12	0.62	5	0.61	14	0.61
Vardi 1988		18	0.74	20	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.57	5	0.66	15	0.61
Wasowski 1980		54	0.59	59	0.00	51	0.05	59	0.05	30	0.25	51	0.11
Zimerman 1975		17	0.74	18	0.00	27	0.17	25	0.51	15	0.51	24	0.51
Average		1	0.85	1	0.74	1	0.73	1	0.88	10	0.67	1	0.77
Random 1		67	-0.05	66	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	41	0.05	67	0.02
Random 2		65	0.00	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	35	0.05	66	0.03
Random 3		66	0.00	60	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	6	0.43	55	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).