Sztompka 1959

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		41	0.44	52	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	61	0.04	62	0.05
Ax 1995		14	0.58	44	0.00	12	0.17	16	0.53	49	0.08	17	0.21
Bacha 1998		48	0.40	23	0.00	42	0.07	47	0.07	56	0.05	46	0.06
Barbosa 1983		34	0.50	5	0.04	28	0.10	32	0.21	25	0.22	16	0.21
BenOr 1989		6	0.61	3	0.07	3	0.25	2	0.72	25	0.30	4	0.46
Biret 1990		26	0.52	22	0.00	20	0.13	19	0.49	36	0.10	14	0.22
Brailowsky 1960		3	0.63	17	0.00	2	0.25	9	0.61	29	0.23	5	0.37
Chiu 1999		59	0.31	43	0.00	56	0.06	51	0.06	61	0.04	57	0.05
Clidat 1994		53	0.35	56	0.00	52	0.08	41	0.08	61	0.04	51	0.06
Cohen 1997		54	0.34	61	0.00	55	0.06	55	0.06	38	0.07	53	0.06
Cortot 1951		57	0.32	53	0.00	59	0.06	57	0.06	42	0.06	55	0.06
Csalog 1996		36	0.49	13	0.01	38	0.07	48	0.07	49	0.06	48	0.06
Czerny 1989		25	0.53	33	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.29	39	0.08	27	0.15
Ezaki 2006		40	0.45	45	0.00	47	0.09	37	0.09	52	0.06	40	0.07
Falvay 1989		8	0.61	26	0.00	11	0.19	7	0.64	47	0.07	15	0.21
Fiorentino 1962		27	0.52	24	0.00	21	0.15	23	0.38	45	0.08	24	0.17
Fliere 1977		46	0.42	47	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.08	52	0.06	41	0.07
Fou 1978		23	0.54	42	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.41	47	0.06	26	0.16
Francois 1956		37	0.47	34	0.00	34	0.10	35	0.10	35	0.10	35	0.10
Goldenweiser 1946		49	0.38	38	0.00	40	0.06	53	0.06	40	0.06	45	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.38	49	0.00	53	0.08	39	0.08	53	0.05	54	0.06
Groot 1988		16	0.56	20	0.00	17	0.16	18	0.51	53	0.06	25	0.17
Hatto 1993		44	0.42	55	0.00	49	0.08	42	0.08	51	0.06	44	0.07
Hatto 1997		45	0.42	18	0.00	48	0.06	56	0.06	57	0.06	49	0.06
Horszowski 1983		63	0.24	46	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.05	56	0.05
Indjic 2001		47	0.41	57	0.00	50	0.11	34	0.11	46	0.07	37	0.09
Katin 1996		20	0.55	16	0.00	25	0.10	25	0.36	41	0.09	22	0.18
Kiepura 1999		17	0.55	21	0.00	15	0.13	15	0.53	36	0.13	9	0.26
Korecka 1992		12	0.58	30	0.00	9	0.20	11	0.59	8	0.65	2	0.62
Kushner 1990		28	0.52	37	0.00	37	0.08	40	0.08	49	0.06	42	0.07
Lilamand 2001		51	0.36	40	0.00	45	0.06	52	0.06	25	0.25	33	0.12
Luisada 1990		30	0.51	19	0.00	29	0.09	30	0.26	47	0.09	30	0.15
Luisada 2008		39	0.46	41	0.00	39	0.09	38	0.09	44	0.08	38	0.08
Lushtak 2004		42	0.44	64	0.00	43	0.10	36	0.10	54	0.05	43	0.07
Malcuzynski 1951		13	0.58	14	0.00	14	0.14	13	0.55	51	0.07	20	0.20
Malcuzynski 1961		11	0.59	11	0.01	13	0.12	12	0.58	41	0.08	13	0.22
Magaloff 1977		55	0.33	63	0.00	54	0.08	45	0.08	62	0.04	50	0.06
Magin 1975		1	0.67	1	0.50	1	0.49	3	0.69	6	0.62	1	0.65
Meguri 1997		58	0.32	58	0.00	57	0.06	58	0.06	62	0.04	58	0.05
Milkina 1970		29	0.51	10	0.01	23	0.11	21	0.43	46	0.09	19	0.20
Mohovich 1999		43	0.43	60	0.00	35	0.06	54	0.06	57	0.05	60	0.05
Nezu 2005		32	0.50	35	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.21	54	0.07	34	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.54	25	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.30	47	0.08	29	0.15
Olejniczak 1990		19	0.55	12	0.01	19	0.15	20	0.48	55	0.07	23	0.18
Osinska 1989		5	0.61	4	0.05	7	0.16	5	0.68	46	0.09	10	0.25
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.35	59	0.00	51	0.07	50	0.07	22	0.22	32	0.12
Poblocka 1999		7	0.61	29	0.00	8	0.14	6	0.66	28	0.39	3	0.51
Rangell 2001		56	0.33	39	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	58	0.04	66	0.04
Richter 1960		60	0.27	54	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	39	0.06	59	0.05
Richter 1961		64	0.15	51	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.05	63	0.04
Rosen 1989		31	0.51	8	0.01	26	0.10	26	0.36	53	0.06	31	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		15	0.56	36	0.00	16	0.13	17	0.53	50	0.07	21	0.19
Rubinstein 1952		10	0.59	6	0.04	5	0.24	10	0.61	49	0.07	18	0.21
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.60	27	0.00	10	0.24	8	0.62	32	0.15	7	0.30
Rudanovskaya 2007		62	0.24	66	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.05	65	0.04
Shebanova 2002		61	0.25	48	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	46	0.04	64	0.04
Smith 1975		24	0.53	9	0.01	18	0.16	14	0.54	41	0.09	12	0.22
Sztompka 1959		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tanyel 1992		33	0.50	32	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.18	58	0.05	36	0.09
Tsujii 2005		38	0.46	62	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.08	60	0.05	52	0.06
Uninsky 1959		21	0.54	7	0.02	27	0.11	24	0.38	54	0.06	28	0.15
Vardi 1988		35	0.49	28	0.00	36	0.07	49	0.07	49	0.06	47	0.06
Wasowski 1980		18	0.55	31	0.00	22	0.09	27	0.34	24	0.36	6	0.35
Zimerman 1975		4	0.62	15	0.00	6	0.18	4	0.68	43	0.09	11	0.25
Average		2	0.65	2	0.17	4	0.38	1	0.79	43	0.10	8	0.28
Random 1		65	0.01	67	0.00	66	0.02	65	0.02	14	0.32	39	0.08
Random 2		67	-0.02	65	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	50	0.04	67	0.02
Random 3		66	0.00	50	0.00	65	0.02	66	0.02	28	0.11	61	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).